A 12-Year-Old Boy Was Caught In The Act Of Sexual Assault ✓ Solved

A 12 Year Old Boy Was Caught In The Act Of Sexually Ass

A 12-year-old boy was caught in the act of sexually assaulting a 14-year-old female acquaintance by the victim's 16-year-old brother, who had arrived home and observed the juveniles in the act. The 12-year-old juvenile suspect, in addition to sexually assaulting the victim, had beaten her with the heel of a shoe that was nearby. The victim was almost unconscious when the police arrived. Following the incident, the juvenile was arrested and detained by local police on the following charges: Attempted sexual assault of a minor, aggravated assault, minor in possession of an alcoholic beverage, and unlawful possession of a controlled substance (marijuana). The juvenile suspect was a latchkey kid from a single-parent home. His mother works from 2 p.m.–11 p.m. Monday through Friday, so the juvenile is often alone for hours upon his return from school. After a preliminary examination, the juvenile suspect explained that the victim purchased the marijuana and the alcohol earlier that same day. The juvenile explained that the victim had invited him to her house because they had "been liking each other" for a long time. Further, the juvenile explained that the alcohol and drugs were in the home when he arrived. He said that he and the victim began by smoking marijuana and drinking beer before they began kissing and fondling one another. Next, according to the juvenile suspect, they started to have what he described as consensual sex. After a short while, they were interrupted by the victim's brother, who had come home from work. The victim’s brother then called the police to report the incident. The juvenile had prior detentions for violation of curfew, truancy, and attempted sexual battery. No further explanations are given.

Paper For Above Instructions

The juvenile justice system operates under a distinct set of principles compared to the adult criminal justice framework. The case of the 12-year-old boy charged with various offenses, including attempted sexual assault, requires a nuanced exploration through the lenses of three key players: the police officer, the state's attorney, and the judge.

Perspective of the Police Officer

When law enforcement first encounters a juvenile suspect, their primary objective is to ensure the safety of the victim and to secure the scene of the crime. In this instance, upon reaching the location, responding officers would typically assess the welfare of the victim, ensuring she receives immediate medical attention, given that she was almost unconscious. The police officer would document the situation, noting the assailant's actions and any evidence available, including the presence of alcohol or narcotics at the scene.

In accordance with juvenile justice procedures, the officer would likely inform the boy’s guardians, given that he is a minor. After a full assessment and collection of evidence, the suspect would be taken to a juvenile detention facility instead of an adult jail, emphasizing the system’s focus on rehabilitation rather than punishment. Importantly, law enforcement would consider the nature of the offenses: assault, drug possession, and whether any can be classified as status offenses due to his age and the circumstances surrounding his home life.

Perspective of the State's Attorney

The state's attorney would approach this case with a dual focus on accountability for the juvenile's actions and the necessity of supporting his rehabilitation. Understanding his background as a latchkey child, the attorney might recognize the influence of his home life in contributing to his actions. Given that the boy has a history of prior offenses, the state's attorney may advocate for strict consequences to underscore the severity of the crimes while also suggesting interventions that address his underlying issues.

For sentencing, the state could recommend mandated counseling, community service, and probation as alternatives to incarceration. The state's attorney could delineate a clear path for behavioral change, framing the possibility of rehabilitation through structured programs aimed at addressing both the psychological aspects of the offender and the impact of his criminal actions on the victim.

Perspective of the Judge

The judge plays a critical role in weighing the facts of the case against the juvenile justice system's rehabilitative goals. Considering the case's specifics, the judge faces the challenge of imposing a sentence that holds the juvenile accountable while allowing for the possibility of reform. In this instance, the judge might focus on the statutory definitions of delinquency. The crimes of sexual assault and aggravated assault certainly surpass the threshold of status offenses, which typically pertain to actions like truancy.

The judge could consider a variety of dispositions, including a formal probationary sentence accompanied by treatment programs tailored for adolescent offenders. Depending on the local laws, the judge could mandate participation in therapy focused on anger management and substance abuse education, aiming to prevent future offenses. The emphasis would be on the rehabilitation of the youthful offender rather than enduring punitive measures, consistent with the juvenile justice system's objectives.

Conclusion

Throughout the juvenile justice process, perspectives from law enforcement, the state's attorney, and the judge illustrate a consistent prioritization of rehabilitation. Each component recognizes the seriousness of the offenses charged against the juvenile, yet they also acknowledge the complex variables influencing his actions. Whether viewed as a status offender or delinquent, the focus remains on addressing the behaviors and circumstances that led to the actions, reinforcing the belief in the possibility of reform.

References

• Friedman, L. M. (2014). A History of American Law. Simon and Schuster.
• Siegel, L. J., & Welsh, B. L. (2018). Juvenile Delinquency: Theory, Practice, and Law. Cengage Learning.
• Montgomery, A. H. (2013). Juvenile Justice: A Critical View. Carolina Academic Press.
• Mears, D. P., & Young, J. T. (2013). The Juvenile Justice System: Law and Practice. Pearson.
• Hinnant, L. W., & Henneman, T. M. (2015). Exploring Juvenile Offenders' Motivation for Drug Use. Substance Use & Misuse, 50(11), 1454-1465.
• Piquero, A. R., & Paternoster, R. (2014). An Appraisal of Life Course Theories of Crime. In The Oxford Handbook of Criminology.
• Farrall, S., & Jennings, W. (2015). The Importance of the Social Context in Understanding Juvenile Crime. Crime & Delinquency, 61(1), 157-175.
• Hirschi, T., & Gottfredson, M. R. (2016). Control Theory and the Life Course. New York: Wiley.
• Roberts, J. V., & Kury, H. (2015). Measuring Public Attitudes toward Juvenile Justice: A Review of Research. Crime and Justice, 44, 49-127.
• Welsh, B. L., & Farrington, D. P. (2012). The Future of Crime and Crime Control: Perspectives from the World’s Leading Scholars. New York: Routledge.