A 5-Page Paper Double Spaced On Slavenka Drakulic Writes ✓ Solved

A 5-page paper double spaced on. Slavenka Drakulic writes, “More than

In her poignant reflection on the Balkan wars, Slavenka Drakulic discusses the culpability of ordinary people in the rise of nationalism and violence. As she states, it was the actions (or inactions) of everyday citizens that fostered an environment where atrocities could occur. This paper seeks to unpack Drakulic’s argument, exploring the notion of collective responsibility in times of conflict. It will analyze her claims regarding how societal indifference can lead to the normalization of violence and the subsequent historical consequences that arise from this indifference.

Understanding Drakulic’s Argument

Drakulic’s assertion underscores a crucial reality: wars are not solely the product of rogue leaders or extremists. Rather, they are often borne out of a societal atmosphere that allows such leadership to thrive. By stating that “we were the ones who one day stopped greeting our neighbors of a different nationality,” she highlights how small acts of division among individuals can lay the groundwork for larger, systemic forms of violence. This perspective invites readers to recognize the slippery slope of normalization concerning hatred and animosity. Her statement implicates the general populace, suggesting that the failure to maintain community ties can lead to catastrophic consequences, including genocide. This argument is particularly relevant today as it prompts inquiry into how societies can foster environments conducive to either peace or conflict.

The Role of Ordinary People

In her analysis, Drakulic references the opening of concentration camps, a grim reality that signifies the extreme outcomes of societal indifference. The normalization of violence against “the other” often starts with subtle acts of dehumanization, such as refusing to engage with neighbors based on their ethnicity or nationality. This behavior not only isolates individuals but also collectively builds a culture where prejudice and violence become socially acceptable. Drakulic’s claim challenges the common narrative that blames only politicians or military leaders for war and atrocities. It insists that all members of society share a responsibility to act against injustice and to uphold humanity in times of strife.

Support for Drakulic’s Claims

Support for Drakulic’s argument can be seen in various historical contexts, demonstrating that ordinary people play a significant role in the perpetuation of violence. For example, during the Holocaust, many individuals, including regular citizens, stood by and allowed systematic extermination to occur. This suggests that societal complicity often stems from fear, apathy, or self-preservation. Zygmunt Bauman, a sociologist, articulated this phenomenon in his work on the Holocaust, suggesting that modernity itself was complicit in the horrors enacted during that time, as ordinary people chose to ignore the unfolding tragedy (Bauman, 1989).

The Dangers of Apathy

Apathy is a powerful force that can inhibit action and contribute to the escalation of violence. When individuals cease to confront injustice or become desensitized to the suffering of others, they inadvertently provide permission for further harm. Drakulic’s argument suggests that greater awareness and vigilance are needed to combat the dangers of apathy. Communities must remain engaged and prioritize dialogue across cultural divides to foster mutual understanding and compassion. The act of greeting one’s neighbor, a simple yet profound gesture, symbolizes a commitment to coexistence and peace.

Counterarguments

While Drakulic’s perspective is compelling, some may argue that individual actions are limited by systemic structures. They may contend that, regardless of individual choice, larger political and economic forces play a decisive role in shaping societal dynamics leading to conflict. However, focusing solely on structural factors can serve as an excuse for inaction. It is essential to recognize that while systemic frameworks are influential, they do not negate individual responsibility. Collective inaction contributes to the perpetuation of harmful systems, making it imperative that individuals confront and resist injustice actively.

Modern Implications

Drakulic’s reflections resonate in contemporary society, as we witness various global conflicts fueled by nationalism and divisiveness. The rise of hate crimes, xenophobia, and intolerance across the world underscores the urgency of her message. Individuals and communities must remain vigilant and proactive in opposing hatred, with the understanding that silence can lead to dangerous consequences. By fostering inclusive behaviors and friendships across divides, ordinary people can counteract the forces that seek to inflame animosity.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Slavenka Drakulic’s assertion that ordinary people play a critical role in fostering an environment where atrocities can occur is powerful and relevant. It calls into question not only the systems of power but also the moral imperative of individuals to act against injustice. Understanding our shared humanity and maintaining connections across differences is essential for preventing the isolation that can lead to conflict. By embracing Drakulic’s insights, society can strive toward a future where compassion and coexistence prevail over hatred and division.

References

• Bauman, Z. (1989). Modernity and the Holocaust. Cornell University Press.
• Drakulic, S. (1993). They Would Never Hurt a Fly: War Criminals on Trial in The Hague. Penguin Books.
• Adorno, T. W. (1998). Minima Moralia: Reflections from Damaged Life. Verso.
• Foucault, M. (1986). The History of Sexuality, Volume 1: An Introduction. Vintage Books.
• Waller, J. (2002). Becoming Evil: How Ordinary People Commit Genocide and Mass Killing. Oxford University Press.
• Snyder, T. (2010). Bloodlands: Europe Between Hitler and Stalin. Basic Books.
• Browning, C. R. (1992). Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland. HarperCollins.
• Hoffman, B. (2006). Inside Terrorism. Columbia University Press.
• Goldhagen, D. J. (1996). Hitler's Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust. Knopf.
• Sontag, S. (2003). Regarding the Pain of Others. Picador.