A Description Of The Work: One Or Two Paragraphs

A Description Of the Worka One Or Two Paragraph Description Of the Wo

This assignment requires writing a 1-2 page summary and analysis of an article, following APA formatting guidelines. The work must include a cover page and a references page, be written in Times New Roman or Arial font size 12, double-spaced, with one-inch margins. The focus is on providing an explanatory summary of the article, including the main idea, the issue at hand, the author’s perspective, and supporting evidence. The writer should assess whether the author achieved their goals and provide a rationale supported by evidence from the text. Additionally, the writer must include their personal opinion on the article, explaining whether they agree or disagree and why, supported by factual data or examples. It is essential to paraphrase all content entirely in the writer’s own words to avoid plagiarism and adhere to academic integrity. Use credible sources for expanding the discussion beyond the article itself, and include a properly formatted APA references page. The assignment emphasizes clarity, proper formatting, and objective analysis without personal bias or subjective opinions beyond reasoned critique. Late submissions or use of unaccepted sources like Wikipedia will result in penalties or a zero grade.

Paper For Above instruction

The article review task centers on producing a comprehensive, analytical summary of a scholarly or professional article. The primary purpose of this assignment is to demonstrate the student's ability to critically engage with the material, articulate its main points accurately, evaluate its effectiveness in achieving its objectives, and offer a well-supported personal assessment. As such, the student must carefully read the assigned article, identify its core thesis, and understand the underlying issues addressed by the author. The analysis should begin with an introduction that contextualizes the article and states its main idea explicitly in the student’s own words.

The subsequent body of the review should examine the issue at hand, detailing the author's perspective and how they substantiate their claims through evidence and logical reasoning. This step involves evaluating whether the author successfully met their goals—did they convincingly argue their point? Were conclusions valid? The student must support any praise or criticism with concrete examples from the text, demonstrating a critical engagement with the material.

Following this, the student should provide their personal opinion regarding the article's content and argumentation. This evaluative component should be reasoned, citing specific data or examples to justify their agreement or disagreement. The opinion should be grounded in factual evidence and not purely subjective impressions. If applicable, students may extend the discussion by referencing additional credible sources that relate to the article’s topic, thus enriching the analysis and demonstrating broader understanding.

The conclusion of the review should succinctly restate the student’s overall assessment of the article, considering its clarity, persuasiveness, and contribution to the field or topic. It is vital that the entire review is written in clear, formal academic language, free of personal bias or informal expressions. The tone should be objective, analytical, and consistent with business writing standards.

Adherence to formatting guidelines is crucial: the paper should include a cover page and references page, use APA style, and follow formatting requirements such as double-spacing, 12-point Times New Roman or Arial font, and one-inch margins. All content must be original and paraphrased, avoiding plagiarism or copying directly from the source. Proper citation and referencing of all sources are essential for academic integrity. Timeliness is also critical; late submissions are penalized, and unaccepted sources like Wikipedia will result in a zero grade. This assignment assesses your critical reading, writing, and analytical skills, contributing to your understanding of scholarly communication in a professional context.

References

• American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.).
• Bean, J. C. (2021). Engaging ideas: The professor's guide to integrating writing, critical thinking, and active learning in the classroom. Jossey-Bass.
• Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
• Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
• Flower, L. (2019). Writing for social scientists: How to start and finish your thesis, book, or article. University of Chicago Press.
• Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, R. W. (2014). Educational research: An introduction (8th ed.). Pearson.
• Hacker, D., & Sommers, N. (2018). A writer’s reference (8th ed.). Bedford/St. Martin’s.
• Lunsford, A. A., & Ruszkiewicz, J. J. (2018). Everything’s an argument (8th ed.). Bedford/St. Martin’s.
• Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
• Williams, J. M. (2018). Style: Lessons in clarity and grace (12th ed.). Pearson.