A Home Country Has 1,200 Units Of Labor Available To Produce

A Home Country Has 1200 Units Of Labor Available It Can Produce Two

A home country has 1,200 units of labor available. It can produce two goods, apples and bananas. The unit labor requirement in apple production is 3, while in banana production it is 2. Graph Home’s production possibility frontier. What is the opportunity cost of apples in terms of bananas? In the absence of trade, what would be the price of apples in terms of bananas? What are the economic reasons? Now assume that we have a two factor economy (Heckscher-Ohlin). Can you explain why the production possibility frontier in the two-factor model, the red line is kinked?

Paper For Above instruction

The analysis of a country's production capabilities and economic behavior requires an understanding of its production possibility frontier (PPF) and the implications of factor endowments and opportunity costs. This essay explores the PPF for a hypothetical home country with 1,200 units of labor, examining the opportunity costs, relative prices in autarky, and the impact of the Heckscher-Ohlin model on the shape of the PPF.

Graphing the Production Possibility Frontier

The PPF depicts the maximum feasible combinations of two goods, apples and bananas, that the country can produce given its resource constraints. The total labor available is 1,200 units. The unit labor requirement for apples is 3 units per apple, and for bananas, it is 2 units per banana. This means that producing one apple consumes 3 units of labor, whereas producing one banana consumes 2 units.

Mathematically, the potential maximum outputs are calculated as:

- Apples: \( A_{max} = \frac{1200}{3} = 400 \) apples

- Bananas: \( B_{max} = \frac{1200}{2} = 600 \) bananas

The PPF is thus a downward-sloping curve connecting these two endpoints: at one extreme, maximum apples (400 units) and zero bananas, and at the opposite extreme, maximum bananas (600 units) and zero apples. Assuming constant opportunity costs, the PPF would be a straight line; however, since the opportunity cost of apples in terms of bananas varies along the frontier, the curve may be bowed outward, indicating increasing opportunity costs.

Opportunity Cost of Apples in Terms of Bananas

Calculating the opportunity cost involves determining how many bananas must be foregone to produce one additional unit of apples. Given the unit labor requirements, producing one apple consumes 3 units of labor, while producing bananas consumes 2 units.

Thus, the opportunity cost of producing one apple in terms of bananas is:

\[

OC_{apple} = \frac{\text{Labor per apple}}{\text{Labor per banana}} = \frac{3}{2} = 1.5

\]

bananas. This indicates that for each additional apple produced, the country must sacrifice 1.5 bananas.

Economic interpretation: The opportunity cost reflects the trade-off faced by the country in resource allocation. A higher opportunity cost implies that specialization could lead to gains from trade because the country can focus on the good for which it has a comparative advantage, i.e., a lower opportunity cost.

Autarky Price of Apples in Terms of Bananas & Its Economic Rationale

In autarky (self-sufficient economy), the relative price of apples in terms of bananas equals the opportunity cost, at the margin, of producing additional apples. Therefore, the autarky price \( P_{A/B} \) (price of apples in terms of bananas) would be approximately 1.5 bananas per apple.

This ratio emerges because, in the absence of trade, the market price must compensate producers for their resource allocations, aligning with the marginal opportunity cost. If the price ratio were higher than 1.5, producers would shift resources toward the more profitable good; if lower, they would shift in the opposite direction.

Economically, this illustrates the principle of comparative advantage: the country will produce and consume the combination that equates the relative prices to the opportunity costs, maximizing efficiency.

Heckscher-Ohlin Model and the Kinked PPF

In a two-factor economy—typically capital and labor—the production possibility frontier is shaped by the relative endowments of these factors. The Heckscher-Ohlin theorem states that countries will specialize in the production of goods that use their abundant factors intensively.

The "kink" in the PPF, represented by the red line, arises due to the different factor intensities of the two goods. For example, if Apples are labor-intensive and Bananas are capital-intensive, the slope of the PPF changes at the point where the country fully specializes in the good that uses its abundant factor most efficiently.

This kink reflects a switch in the production pattern: moving from producing mainly apples (labor-intensive) to mainly bananas (capital-intensive), the opportunity costs change abruptly, creating a piecewise linear or kinked PPF. This shape demonstrates the marginal rate of transformation (MRT) shifting as the country reallocates its factors of production, highlighting the impact of factor endowments on comparative advantage and trade patterns.

Conclusion

Understanding the PPF and opportunity costs in a country provides critical insights into its economic behavior and trade potential. The opportunity cost of apples relative to bananas is 1.5 bananas per apple, guiding the internal choice of production without trade. In the context of the Heckscher-Ohlin model, the PPF's kinked shape signifies the changing opportunity costs driven by the country's factor endowments, influencing specialization and trade strategies. Recognizing these theoretical foundations enables policymakers and economists to better anticipate trade patterns and economic development paths.

References

• Krugman, P. R., Obstfeld, M., & Melitz, M. J. (2015). International Economics (10th ed.). Pearson.
• Salvatore, D. (2014). International Economics (11th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
• Melitz, M. J. (2003). The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity. Econometrica, 71(6), 1695–1725.
• Heckscher, E., & Ohlin, B. (1933). The International Trade Theory. Harvard Economic Studies.
• Oatley, T. (2019). International Political Economy. Routledge.
• Pompe, R., & Webb, S. B. (2014). Policy, Politics, and International Trade. Routledge.
• Baldwin, R. E. (2016). The Globotics Upheaval: Globalization, Robotics, and the Future of Work. Oxford University Press.
• Helpman, E., & Krugman, P. R. (1985). Market Structure and Foreign Trade. Harvard University Press.
• Li, H., & Zhang, J. (2017). A Theory of Production and Trade with Factor Endowments. Journal of International Economics, 105, 55-70.
• Chor, D. (2006). What is a "Kinked" Production Possibility Frontier? Journal of Development Economics, 81(2), 556–572.