A Married Couple Plans To Have 4 Children And Wondering

A Married Couple Plans To Have 4 Children And Are Wondering How Many W

A married couple plans to have 4 children and are wondering how many would be boys. Assume there are no twins or multiple births and that the probability for having a boy would be 0.50. Is this a binomial experiment? Explain why this is a binomial experiment and check all four required conditions. In the problem above, you were told to assume none would be twins. Why? Which conditions for binomial experiment would be violated if they were twins?

Paper For Above instruction

The scenario of a married couple planning to have four children, with interest in determining the number of boys among them, can be analyzed through the framework of a binomial experiment. A binomial experiment is a statistical experiment that satisfies four specific conditions: fixed number of trials, two possible outcomes per trial, independent trials, and a constant probability of success. Evaluating whether this situation qualifies as a binomial experiment requires examining each of these conditions in detail.

First, the fixed number of trials is present because the couple intends to have exactly four children. This is a predetermined number, which aligns with the binomial model requirement that the number of trials, n, be fixed in advance. Second, each trial (i.e., each child's birth) has only two possible outcomes concerning the binary classification of gender: boy or girl. Here, "success" can be defined as having a boy, and "failure" as having a girl. Since these are the only two outcomes, this condition is satisfied.

Third, the assumption of independence between trials is crucial. The births of each child are presumed to be independent events, meaning that the gender of one child does not influence the gender of another. This independence holds under the assumption that there are no twins or multiple births, as these would create a single trial encompassing multiple children, thereby violating the independence assumption. Fourth, the probability of success, p, remains constant at 0.50 for each child, since the likelihood of having a boy or girl is generally considered equal and independent of previous births.

In the given problem, the explicit assumption that there are no twins or multiple births is critical to maintaining these conditions, especially the independence of trials. If the couple were to have twins, the trial structure would change because a new "single" trial would then involve two children born simultaneously. This would violate the independence condition because the gender outcomes of twins are not independent; for example, if one twin is a boy, it slightly affects the probability distribution for the other twin, especially in terms of shared genetic and environmental factors.

Furthermore, having twins would alter the fixed number of trials. Instead of four separate trials, the couple’s four children could then be born in fewer than four events, such as two sets of twins. This would complicate the analysis and invalidate the assumption of a fixed number of independent trials with identical probabilities, thus violating the binomial conditions.

In conclusion, this situation is a binomial experiment because it involves a fixed number of independent trials, each with two possible outcomes and a constant probability of success, provided twins are excluded. The assumption of no twins ensures that each child's gender is independent of the others, maintaining the integrity of the binomial conditions. If twins were involved, the independence of trials would be compromised, and the experiment would no longer fit the binomial model, requiring a different statistical approach to account for correlated outcomes.

References

• Looney, C. (2018). Introduction to Probability and Statistics. Pearson.
• McClave, J., Benson, P., & Sincich, T. (2018). Statistics for Business and Economics. Pearson.
• Blitzstein, J., & Hwang, J. (2014). Introduction to Probability. CRC Press.
• Devore, J. L. (2015). Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences. Cengage Learning.
• Walpole, R. E., Myers, R. H., Myers, S. L., & Ye, K. (2012). Probability & Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences. Pearson.
• Ross, S. M. (2014). Introduction to Probability Models. Academic Press.
• Moore, D. S., McCabe, G. P., & Craig, B. A. (2017). Introduction to the Practice of Statistics. W. H. Freeman.
• Hogg, R. V., & Tanis, E. A. (2015). Probability and Statistical Inference. Pearson.
• Agresti, A. (2018). Statistical Thinking: Improving Business Performance. CRC Press.
• Scholkopf, B., & Smola, A. J. (2002). Learning with Kernels: Support Vector Machines, Regularization, Optimization, and Beyond. MIT Press.