A Portfolio Is Built Using A Set Of Subsidiary Portfolios

A Portfolio Is Built Using A Set Of Subsidiary Portfolios Programs P

A portfolio is built using a set of subsidiary portfolios, programs, projects, and operational activities. The selection of key components is crucial in portfolio success. What role do portfolio funding and portfolio resources play in structuring the portfolio? How is this connected to the selection and continuing evaluation of portfolio key components? Connect your post to the assigned reading from Week 5.

Paper For Above instruction

Effective management of organizational portfolios requires a strategic alignment of resources and funding to ensure that the most valuable initiatives are prioritized and sustained. Portfolio funding and resources are fundamental in shaping the structure of a portfolio, influencing both the selection of components and their ongoing evaluation. Drawing upon the standard practices delineated in PMI’s "The Standard for Portfolio Management" (PMI, 2017) and insights from Killen and Hunt (2010), this paper explores the integral role of funding and resources in portfolio management and their connection to the dynamic evaluation of portfolio components.

Portfolio funding refers to the allocation of financial resources to various programs, projects, and operational activities within the portfolio. It establishes the financial boundaries within which managers operate and directly impacts the feasibility and prioritization of selected components. Proper allocation ensures that high-value initiatives receive adequate funding, aligning with organizational strategies and strategic goals. This allocation process involves continuous assessment to adapt to changing organizational priorities and external environmental factors. PMI (2017) emphasizes that effective portfolio funding mechanisms are vital for balancing risk and return, enabling organizations to invest in initiatives that provide the highest strategic value.

Resources, encompassing human capital, infrastructure, technology, and information, are equally vital in shaping portfolio structure. The strategic deployment of resources ensures that selected components are capable of achieving their objectives. Proper resource management facilitates synergy among components, minimizes redundancies, and maximizes value realization. Effective resource allocation depends on a clear understanding of the capacity and capability of the organization, aligning these with the strategic intent of the portfolio (PMI, 2017). The synchronization of funding and resources ensures that selected initiatives have the means to deliver outcomes consistent with organizational goals.

The connection between portfolio funding/resources and the selection of key components lies in the capability to dynamically adapt to organizational needs. Killen and Hunt (2010) highlight that organizations with strong portfolio management capabilities can effectively leverage their resources to gain competitive advantage. Such organizations utilize continuous evaluation processes to reallocate funding and resources based on ongoing performance and changing priorities. This approach supports the identification of high-potential initiatives and the deprioritization or termination of less promising ones, fostering agility and strategic alignment.

The continuous evaluation process is central to maintaining a healthy portfolio. It involves regular reviews of the performance and strategic relevance of portfolio components, facilitated by the availability and allocation of resources and funding. Adequate funding allows for proactive risk management and responsiveness to market or environmental shifts. Conversely, insufficient or misaligned resources can lead to project delays, scope reductions, or failures, undermining the portfolio’s overall success. PMI (2017) underscores that effective portfolio governance ensures that funding and resources are adjusted in response to performance metrics, maintaining strategic alignment and optimizing value delivery.

Furthermore, the feedback loop created by ongoing evaluation ensures that portfolio components remain aligned with organizational strategy. An optimal balance of funding and resources enables portfolio managers to make informed decisions about continuing, expanding, or terminating initiatives. This dynamic process supports organizational agility and provides a mechanism for adjusting to internal and external changes, ultimately contributing to sustained competitive advantage (Killen & Hunt, 2010).

In conclusion, portfolio funding and resources are vital structural elements that directly influence the selection and ongoing evaluation of portfolio components. Their strategic allocation ensures that initiatives are adequately supported, aligned with organizational objectives, and adaptable to change. By integrating continuous evaluation processes with effective resource and funding management, organizations can foster agility, maximize value, and achieve sustained competitive advantage, as emphasized in both PMI’s standards and academic research.

References

  • Project Management Institute. (2017). The standard for portfolio management (4th ed.). Newtown Square, PA: Author.
  • Killen, C. P., & Hunt, R. (2010). Dynamic capability: understanding the relationship between project portfolio management capability and competitive advantage. In PMI® Research Conference: Defining the Future of Project Management, Washington, DC.
  • Archer, N. P., & Ghasemzadeh, F. (1999). An integrated framework for project portfolio selection. International Journal of Project Management, 17(4), 207-216.
  • Cabral, S., & Kumar, V. (2015). Portfolio management: A strategic view of project selection. International Journal of Project Management, 33(4), 824-835.
  • Gareis, R., & Huemann, M. (2010). Connecting project portfolio management and project management: Insights and suggestions. International Journal of Project Management, 28(2), 119-130.
  • Kwak, Y. H., & Anbari, F. T. (2009). Analyzing project management’s challenges in executing project portfolios. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, 1(4), 370-374.
  • Müller, R., & Turner, R. (2007). The impact of stakeholder and communication management on project success. Project Management Journal, 38(3), 6-17.
  • PMI. (2017). The standard for portfolio management. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
  • Tezel, A., & Rieskamp, J. (2018). Portfolio allocation and dynamic resource management in project-based organizations. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 11(1), 198-219.
  • Zhang, L., & Ng, S. (2020). Strategic resource allocation in project portfolios: Theory and practice. Operations Research Perspectives, 7, 100153.

Related Assignments