A Project Plan Cannot Be Considered Complete Until The Resou
A Project Plan Cannot Be Considered Complete Until The Resources Have
A project plan cannot be considered complete until the resources have been assigned (including budget and cost estimate). This week, you will assign the resources required to work on your project to your scheduled tasks. In addition, you will add the cost of the resources per hour and any direct or indirect cost required for project contracts, materials, or supplies. You will submit a two-part summary report (business professional format) of your project budget and resources, which includes the following: Part 1: Project Budget (Cost Management) Explain your approach to estimating the project cost (e.g., top down, bottom up, etc.) and why that method was chosen. Create a table that shows the original budgeted cost (from the charter) and the actual budgeted cost (side by side). Include line items for labor, materials, contract, equipment, travel cost, and so on. Compare the budget from the charter to the final budget and explain any variances that occurred from your original budgeted cost in the project charter and the current project cost (include your original estimated cost for the project). Explain your budget contingency plan and how much is budgeted for contingency. Part 2: Resource Management Explain the results of your resource assignments. Did you assign enough people to the project? Were there any resources over-allocated? What approach will you take to fix any allocation problems? Develop a plan to manage your project team and define how you will motivate your team and how you will handle team conflicts. What structure would you select for your project: functional, weak matrix, balanced matrix, strong matrix, or pure project? Why? Deliverables for Week 6: MS project file (.mpp) updated with resource assignments and cost MS Word file with report of project budget and resource management
Paper For Above instruction
The successful management of a project hinges significantly on comprehensive planning, particularly in resource allocation and cost estimation. This paper explores the process of assigning resources and formulating a robust project budget, emphasizing effective cost management strategies and resource management approaches. It offers insights into methodologies for estimating project costs, comparing original budgets to actual expenditures, addressing variances, and managing project teams efficiently to achieve desired outcomes.
Part 1: Project Budget (Cost Management)
Effective cost estimation forms the backbone of sound project management. Among the various methods, the bottom-up estimating approach is particularly advantageous when detailed information about individual components is available, enabling a detailed and accurate projection of costs. This method involves aggregating costs from individual tasks or components upwards to compile an overall project budget. The primary reasons for selecting this approach include its precision and alignment with the project's detailed planning phase, which facilitates identifying potential cost overruns early and provides a foundation for contingencies.
In constructing the project budget, the original estimates from the project charter serve as a baseline. The actual budgeted costs are updated progressively to reflect current estimates incorporating revised scope, resource pricing, and unforeseen expenses. Table 1 illustrates a comparison between initial and actual project budgets across key categories such as labor, materials, contracts, equipment, and travel costs.
| Budget Category | Original Budget (Charter) | Final Budget |
|---|---|---|
| Labor | $50,000 | $55,000 |
| Materials | $10,000 | $12,000 |
| Contracts | $8,000 | $8,500 |
| Equipment | $5,000 | $4,800 |
| Travel | $2,000 | $2,200 |
Analysis indicates that labor and materials costs exceeded initial estimates due to unforeseen scope extensions and market price fluctuations. Contract costs remained relatively stable, while equipment costs slightly decreased owing to negotiated discounts. Travel costs increased marginally owing to additional site visits.
To address these variances, a contingency budget amounting to 10% of total costs was incorporated, capable of covering unexpected expenses. This contingency fund provides a financial buffer, ensuring that the project can accommodate minor variations without jeopardizing overall scope or deadlines. The contingency plan involves regular financial reviews to monitor expenditure and adjust allocations proactively.
Part 2: Resource Management
Resource assignment analysis revealed that sufficient personnel were allocated to key project tasks; however, in some instances, resources were over-allocated, leading to potential burnout and inefficient use of staff. Specifically, certain team members were scheduled for multiple tasks simultaneously, exceeding their capacity.
To resolve over-allocation, resource leveling techniques were employed, prioritizing tasks based on criticality and adjusting schedules to optimize resource utilization. This included extending task durations where feasible and reallocating personnel to balance workloads. These adjustments ensure that resources are used efficiently without overburdening staff.
Effective team management is vital for project success. Strategies include regular communication, recognition of individual contributions, and setting clear performance expectations to motivate team members. Addressing conflicts promptly through mediation and fostering a collaborative environment helps maintain team cohesion.
The structural choice for the project influences resource management and authority distribution. A balanced matrix structure was selected because it offers flexibility in sharing resources across multiple projects, facilitates effective communication, and allows for clear authority lines without the rigidity of a pure project organization. This structure promotes collaborative decision-making and resource sharing, which aligns with the project’s dynamic needs.
Implementing a comprehensive resource management plan involves ongoing monitoring, adjusting allocations based on project progress, and ensuring team motivation through recognition and professional development opportunities. Conflict resolution mechanisms include open forums and predefined protocols to address disagreements constructively.
Conclusion
Efficient resource and cost management are critical to project success. Employing accurate estimation methods, continuously monitoring expenditures, and addressing resource over-allocations ensure projects stay within scope and budget. Adopting an appropriate organizational structure, such as a balanced matrix, enhances flexibility and resource sharing. Ultimately, proactive team management fosters motivation, collaboration, and conflict resolution, leading to successful project completion.
References
- Kerzner, H. (2017). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. John Wiley & Sons.
- Aguide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide). (2021). Project Management Institute.
- PMI. (2019). Talent Triangle and Resource Management Strategies. Project Management Institute.
- Meredith, J. R., & Mantel, S. J. (2014). Project Management: A Managerial Approach. Wiley.
- Lock, D. (2013).Project Management. Gower Publishing, Ltd.
- Russell, R. S., & Taylor, B. W. (2014). Operations Management. Wiley.
- Chapman, C., & Ward, S. (2011). Project Risk Management: Practical Approaches. Wiley.
- Heldman, K. (2018). PMP Project Management Professional Exam Study Guide. Sybex.
- Boehm, B. W. (1981). Software Engineering Economics. IEEE.
- Schwalbe, K. (2018). Information Technology Project Management. Cengage Learning.