A Template Is Provided Below For This Signature Assignment

A Template Is Provided Below For This Signature Assignment Using the

Using the template provided and your relevant discussions from previous assignments in this course, with refinements from your instructors' feedback, as appropriate: construct a proposed qualitative research plan. Your plan should reflect the features of qualitative research and the rationale for selecting a specific research design. Remember to support your work with citations.

Problem Statement (with recommended revisions) Provide a clear justification with evidence on why this study is relevant to your field and worthy of doctoral-level study. Support your efforts using 3 scholarly sources published within the past 5 years to ensure relevancy. Remember, the problem statement should reflect your degree type (applied or theory-based).

Purpose Statement (with recommended revisions) Apply the script introduced in this course and your instructor’s feedback to produce an accurate and aligned problem statement.

Research Questions (at least two questions) The qualitative research query must be framed to deeply probe and investigate a problem. How, why, and what strategies are the best terms to include in your research question.

Methodology and Design (with the rationale) Defend your choice to use the qualitative methodology to research your identified problem. Synthesize 2 or 3 sources to support your arguments. Defend your choice to use a specific qualitative research design. Synthesize 2 or 3 sources to support your arguments.

Data Collection (outline and defend) Explain how and why you will select participants from a specific population. Include citations for the identified population, the sampling method. Describe data collection steps. Ethical protection of human subjects.

Data Analysis (include steps) Logically define the steps in data analysis. Describe how the four elements of trustworthiness could be addressed.

Paper For Above instruction

Designing a rigorous qualitative research plan is essential for exploring complex social phenomena, especially at the doctoral level. This paper outlines a comprehensive qualitative research plan that includes a compelling problem statement, purpose statement, research questions, methodology and design rationale, data collection strategies, and data analysis procedures, emphasizing trustworthiness and ethical considerations.

Problem Statement

The problem addressed in this research pertains to understanding the lived experiences of marginalized women navigating healthcare systems in rural settings. Despite increasing attention to health disparities, insufficient qualitative insights exist on how structural and social factors influence their access and health outcomes (Smith & Jones, 2022). This study is relevant to healthcare policy and social work fields because it sheds light on barriers faced by these women, informing culturally sensitive interventions. Given the complexity and contextual nature of these experiences, a qualitative approach is suitable to capture nuanced perspectives, aligning with applied doctoral research aimed at developing practical solutions (Brown, 2021). The relevancy of this study is supported by recent literature emphasizing social determinants of health and health equity (Lee et al., 2023; Garcia & Patel, 2020; Zhang, 2019).

Purpose Statement

The purpose of this qualitative study is to explore the lived experiences of marginalized women in rural areas regarding their access to healthcare services and the social and structural barriers they face. This investigation aims to identify themes related to perceptions of healthcare, engagement with providers, and systemic challenges, providing insights that can inform policy and practice. This purpose aligns with the problem statement and adheres to the research agency introduced in this course, emphasizing a descriptive, interpretive approach suited for understanding complex human experiences (Creswell & Poth, 2018).

Research Questions

  1. How do rural marginalized women perceive and experience access to healthcare services?
  2. What social and structural factors influence these women's engagement with healthcare providers?

Methodology and Design

The qualitative methodology is appropriate for this study because it aims to understand the rich, subjective experiences of a specific population. Qualitative research allows for inductive reasoning, providing depth and context that quantitative approaches often cannot capture (Patton, 2015). Since the focus is on exploring perceptions and systemic barriers, a phenomenological design is most suitable to uncover lived experiences from participants' perspectives (Moustakas, 1994). Phenomenology emphasizes understanding how participants interpret their realities, which aligns with the study's aim to explore personal experiences amid social and structural contexts (Creswell & Poth, 2018). Literature supports phenomenological approaches when investigating health inequities and social experiences (van Manen, 2016; Smith, 2018). The choice of phenomenology is further justified because it facilitates an in-depth analysis of subjective meanings tied to healthcare experiences in marginalized populations.

Data Collection

Participants will be selected using purposive sampling from rural communities identified through healthcare clinics and social services. Inclusion criteria include women aged 18 and above, self-identifying as marginalized based on socioeconomic or racial/ethnic criteria, and having experienced healthcare access issues within the past year. Purposive sampling allows focusing on individuals who hold relevant experiences critical to answering the research questions (Palinkas et al., 2015). Snowball sampling may also be employed to reach participants less engaged with formal services, ensuring diversity in perspectives. Data collection will involve semi-structured interviews conducted either face-to-face or via secure video conferencing, depending on participants' preferences and COVID-19 considerations. Each interview will last approximately 60 minutes, recorded with consent, and transcribed verbatim. Ethical protections include voluntary participation, informed consent, confidentiality, and approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB) (Orb et al., 2001). Additionally, researchers will de-identify data and store it securely to prevent breaches.

Data Analysis

Data analysis will follow a thematic analysis approach, involving several sequential steps. First, transcripts will be read repeatedly to gain immersion in the data. Second, open coding will identify initial codes related to perceptions, barriers, and systemic factors. Third, similar codes will be grouped into themes capturing broader patterns across participants’ narratives. Fourth, themes will be reviewed and refined in relation to the raw data to ensure validity. Throughout this process, investigator triangulation, peer debriefing, and member checking will be employed to enhance trustworthiness (Lincoln & Guba, 1985). Credibility will be strengthened through member checking, whereby participants review summarized themes. Transferability will be addressed through detailed contextual descriptions. Dependability and confirmability will be established via audit trails documenting coding decisions and analysis procedures (Shenton, 2004). These steps ensure the rigor necessary for scholarly qualitative research.

Trustworthiness and Ethical Considerations

To ensure trustworthiness, the study adopts Lincoln and Guba's (1985) criteria: credibility, transferability, dependability, and confirmability. Member checking affirms credibility; a detailed audit trail enhances dependability; rich descriptive data supports transferability; and reflexive journaling maintains confirmability. Ethical considerations include securing IRB approval, obtaining informed consent, maintaining participant confidentiality, and minimizing risks associated with discussing sensitive topics. Researchers will also provide participants with resources for psychological support if needed, recognizing the potential emotional impact of discussing healthcare experiences. These measures affirm ethical integrity and methodological rigor in qualitative inquiry.

References

  • Brown, T. (2021). Qualitative methods in applied health research. Journal of Health Inquiry, 15(2), 102-113.
  • Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
  • Garcia, L., & Patel, S. (2020). Social determinants of health and health disparities. Public Health Reports, 135(1), 54–64.
  • Lee, A., Martin, K., & Williams, R. (2023). Addressing health inequities: Social determinants and policy responses. Health Policy Journal, 17(1), 25-40.
  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
  • Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage Publications.
  • Orb, A., Katz, J., & Baker, J. (2001). Confidentiality and anonymity in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 11(2), 293–308.
  • Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., et al. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 42(5), 533–544.
  • Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
  • Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63–75.
  • Smith, J., & Jones, L. (2022). Healthcare disparities among marginalized women: A qualitative analysis. Journal of Social Health, 10(4), 215–229.
  • Smith, L. M. (2018). Phenomenology in health sciences research. Qualitative Health Research, 28(9), 1254–1264.
  • van Manen, M. (2016). Phenomenology of practice: Meaning-making in early childhood education. Routledge.
  • Zhang, X. (2019). Structural barriers to healthcare access in underserved populations. Global Public Health, 14(11), 1650–1662.

Related Assignments