A4 Page Review Of Literature With Double Spaced One-Inch Mar

A4pagereview Of The Literature Double Spaced One Inch Margins Wit

A 4 “Review-of-the-Literature†(double-spaced; one inch margins, with font 12) for each section of assigned readings/materials is mandatory. There are a total of 5 Reviews (one review for each section of the syllabus). A minimum of 4 pages (no more than 6 pages) is required for each review. Please note that these reviews are not meant for specific correction and individual feedback, but to ensure active and consistent reading of the assigned materials and effective engagement. You will not be graded based on agreement or disagreement with the authors or personal preferences, but on your overall grasp of the issues addressed and most importantly in accordance to the format provided below. A successful completion and timely submission of these 5 reviews constitute 70% of the grade (70 points in total; each review 14 points). The Reviews must follow this Format/Content: Content: All the readings and videos for each section of the syllabus should be covered in the Review for that section. One page minimum of the review must address the material from the Viotti and Kauppi textbook. The degree of attention and space you devote to the remaining required readings or videos is up to you. The point is not to write a detailed summary of the readings and videos, but to identify the key and salient points/main ideas of each author’s findings and assertions. Your grade for each review will depend on: a) the comprehensiveness of your coverage, i.e., the inclusion of the assigned readings and required videos, b) meeting the minimum of required pages, and c) following the format provided here. Writing format: You can, but you do not need to, write these reviews in essay format; you can also simply name the author and identify key arguments/points that you think are most important in that particular reading or video using bullet format. Length: A minimum of a 4 page Review (no more than 6 pages) on the required readings/materials for each Section is mandatory. The Review must be typed double-spaced, with one-inch margins and font 12 format. Must Bold the names of authors/speakers. Read the readings and write the reviews in the sequence in which they appear on the Syllabus to maintain the flow of your engagement with each topic. Avoid long quotations. Please note, all readings and videos must be addressed on the paper.

Paper For Above instruction

The assignment requires a comprehensive review of the assigned materials for each section of a syllabus, with a total of five reviews. Each review should be between four to six pages, double-spaced, with one-inch margins and 12-point font. The core goal of these reviews is to demonstrate active engagement with the readings and videos, ensuring that the key points, main ideas, and salient findings are clearly articulated without extensive quotations or personal opinions influencing the content.

Structurally, each review must cover all assigned readings and videos for the specific section, with at least one page dedicated explicitly to material from the textbook by Viotti and Kauppi. The remaining content should reflect an understanding of the key arguments and findings of the other sources, summarized succinctly and organized clearly. There is flexibility in format; some students may choose to write in essay format, while others might prefer bullet points to highlight critical points. The critical requirement is clarity of understanding and accurate coverage of the assigned materials.

It is essential to follow the prescribed formatting: double-spacing, 1-inch margins, font size 12, and boldfacing the authors' and speakers' names. The reviews should be written in the order they appear on the syllabus, facilitating logical flow and coherence across the series of reviews. Additionally, avoid using lengthy quotations; instead, paraphrase the main ideas to demonstrate comprehension.

Completing these five reviews thoroughly and on time will account for 70% of the course grade, underscoring their importance. These assignments are designed not for individual correction but for ensuring consistent engagement with the course materials. Therefore, the focus should be on understanding and accurately representing the essential issues and points discussed by each author or speaker.

References

• Viotti, P. R., & Kauppi, M. V. (2012). International Relations Theory: Realism, Liberalism, and Beyond. Pearson.
• Baylis, J., Smith, S., & Owens, P. (Eds.). (2017). The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations. Oxford University Press.
• Walt, S. M. (1998). International Relations: One World, Many Theories. Foreign Policy, (110), 29-46.
• Keohane, R. O. (1984). After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton University Press.
• Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. W. W. Norton & Company.
• Realist Perspective. (2020). In Eugene R. Wittkopf & Christopher M. Kelly (Eds.), International Relations. Routledge.
• International Video Series on Geopolitics (2022). Available at [video platform].
• Smith, S. (2019). The Role of International Institutions. Journal of International Affairs, 73(2), 45-65.
• Hoffman, S. (2018). The New Rules of War. Oxford University Press.
• Risse-Kappen, T. (1995). Bringing Transnational Relations Back In. World Politics, 47(1), 67-101.