ABC/123 Version X 1 DRO Contingency Worksheet PSY/420 Versio

ABC/123 Version X 1 DRO Contingency Worksheet PSY/420 Version University of Phoenix Material DRO Contingency Worksheet

Decide which of the following concepts are most applicable to each scenario: differential reinforcement of other behavior, avoidance contingency, punishment by prevention of reinforcer, punishment by loss of reinforcer, or avoidance of loss. Defend your answer 175 words each, using citations as needed.

Paper For Above instruction

Scenario 1: Sally, a 13-year-old, cleans her room proactively to avoid her mother’s nagging. This behavior exemplifies an avoidance contingency, where Sally performs the behavior to prevent the aversive stimulus—her mother’s nagging—from occurring. According to Milby et al. (1968), avoidance involves engaging in a behavior to prevent an anticipated negative event, which is consistent here. Sally’s cleaning reduces the likelihood of her mother nagging, acting as a proactive measure to avoid an unpleasant stimulus. The reinforcement for her cleaning behavior is the absence of nagging, reinforcing her response. This also aligns with the concept of avoidance of loss, where Sally strives to prevent her mother from expressing disapproval, which could be perceived as a loss of social reinforcement. Therefore, the behavior is best classified as an avoidance contingency, as Sally attempts to prevent a negative outcome through her actions, effectively shaping her behavior to evade punishment or negative stimuli in her environment.

Scenario 2: Sally's removal from the relay team after performing poorly can be viewed through the lens of punishment by loss of reinforcer. Her ability to participate in future meets and the social recognition of being part of the team serve as reinforcers. When Sally performs poorly, she faces the loss of these reinforcers—namely, her spot on the team and associated social status—aligning with the concept where behavior decreases due to the loss of valued rewards. This removal acts as a punishment that decreases the likelihood of her repeating the performance that led to her removal. As stated by Kazdin (2017), loss of reinforcement after a behavior results in extinction or suppression of that behavior. Sally's decreased motivation to improve after removal further exemplifies punishment by loss of reinforcer, emphasizing the connection between performance, reinforcement, and subsequent behavioral adjustments.

Scenario 3: After qualifying for the relay again, Sally works consistently to maintain her position, which demonstrates differential reinforcement of other behavior. Her improvements are supported by reinforcing her efforts and perseverance, leading to sustained effort rather than just performance outcome. Davis (2011) notes that differential reinforcement involves reinforcing a behavior to encourage its occurrence while withholding reinforcement for alternative behaviors. In Sally’s case, her coach’s reinforcement of her hard work and progress fosters continued effort, exemplifying how differential reinforcement promotes desirable behaviors. Her ongoing motivation reflects the reinforcement of her perseverance and improvement, distinct from just the outcome of her performance. This pattern shows how differential reinforcement can shape and maintain behaviors aligned with personal goals, such as maintaining her position on the team through effort and persistence.

Scenario 4: Chad fails to submit homework on time despite knowing it’s essential, displaying a pattern of procrastination. This situation can be characterized as an avoidance contingency, where Chad delays or avoids the task to escape the discomfort or difficulty associated with completing it. According to Skinner (1953), avoidance involves behavior that prevents an unpleasant stimulus—in this case, the potential negative consequences or feelings associated with late assignments and failure. Chad’s procrastination temporarily relieves him from addressing the task but results in ongoing academic issues. His failure to complete assignments aligns with avoidance of loss, as Chad seeks to prevent the loss of grades, privileges, or self-esteem associated with poor performance. Reinforcing this behavior inadvertently maintains his procrastination and impedes academic success, illustrating the critical importance of intervention to modify avoidance behaviors for improved learning outcomes.

Scenario 5: Chad’s mother reinforces his talking about school every five minutes without negative comments, which is an example of reinforcement by prevention of loss. Here, her positive response maintains Chad’s verbal behavior, acting as a reinforcer that prevents the negative consequence—his annoyed or critical responses about school. Rehkugler et al. (2015) describe reinforcement by prevention of loss as reinforcing a behavior by preventing or delaying a negative outcome. In this case, her uncritical reinforcement encourages Chad to continue talking about school, which might reduce his feelings of frustration or boredom. This behavior management strategy shifts potential punishment—being ignored or criticized—into a reinforcement by preventing loss of social reinforcement. It demonstrates how reinforcement by prevention of loss can maintain certain behaviors and highlights the importance of consistent, positive reinforcement to shape desirable behaviors effectively.

References

  • Milby, J. B., et al. (1968). The avoidance response. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75(1), 137–142.
  • Kazdin, A. E. (2017). Behavior modification in applied settings. Cengage Learning.
  • Davis, K. (2011). Principles of reinforcement in behavioral psychology. Journal of Behavioral Analysis, 24(3), 45–59.
  • Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and Human Behavior. New York: Macmillan.
  • Rehkugler, S., et al. (2015). Reinforcement by prevention of loss: A review. Behavior Analysis Today, 16(2), 216–225.
  • Milby, J. B., et al. (1968). The avoidance response. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75(1), 137–142.
  • Kazdin, A. E. (2017). Behavior modification in applied settings. Cengage Learning.
  • Davis, K. (2011). Principles of reinforcement in behavioral psychology. Journal of Behavioral Analysis, 24(3), 45–59.
  • Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and Human Behavior. New York: Macmillan.
  • Rehkugler, S., et al. (2015). Reinforcement by prevention of loss: A review. Behavior Analysis Today, 16(2), 216–225.

Related Assignments