ABC Co. And Its Financial Performance, Inventory Analysis

ABC Co. and its financial performance, inventory analysis, outsourcing decisions, and economic forecasts

Based on the provided data, this report analyzes ABC Company's financial performance, inventory management, outsourcing considerations, and economic indicators impacting retail sales. The analysis includes calculations of asset commitment to inventory, inventory turnover, weeks of inventory, and a comparison of performance over two years. Additionally, it evaluates the criteria for outsourcing to foreign locations, assesses whether manufacturing in-house or outsourcing is more cost-effective based on demand, and forecasts unemployment rates to predict retail sales trends.

Paper For Above instruction

ABC Company, a prominent player in its industry, faces multiple strategic decisions influenced by internal financial metrics and external economic trends. This report thoroughly examines its recent financial performance, inventory management metrics, potential outsourcing locations, and macroeconomic forecasts impacting retail sales. By analyzing these aspects, ABC Company can better strategize for sustainable growth and competitive advantage.

Financial Performance Analysis

In the current fiscal year, ABC Co. generated a net revenue of $75,000, with a cost of sales amounting to $60,000. The inventory investment stood at $12,000, and the total assets on the company's balance sheet were valued at $150,000. To evaluate how efficiently assets are utilized in inventory management, the percentage of assets committed to inventory was calculated. This metric indicates the proportion of total assets tied up in inventory, which impacts liquidity and operational flexibility.

Percentage of assets committed to inventory is calculated as:

Percentage = (Inventory Investment / Total Assets) × 100

Substituting the known values:

Percentage = ($12,000 / $150,000) × 100 = 8%

This indicates that 8% of ABC Company's assets are currently invested in inventory.

Next, inventory turnover provides insight into how many times inventory is sold and replaced over a period. It is calculated as:

Inventory Turnover = Cost of Goods Sold / Average Inventory

Assuming that inventory remains relatively stable, average inventory is approximated as the ending inventory of $12,000. Therefore, inventory turnover is:

Inventory Turnover = $60,000 / $12,000 = 5

Thus, ABC Company turns over its inventory five times annually, reflecting efficiency in managing inventory levels.

Weeks of inventory indicates how long the current inventory will last with sales at the current rate, calculated as:

Weeks of Inventory = (Average Inventory / Cost of Goods Sold) × 52

Using the inventory investment of $12,000:

Weeks of Inventory = ($12,000 / $60,000) × 52 ≈ 10.4 weeks

This suggests that ABC maintains enough inventory for approximately ten weeks of sales, balancing stock availability with minimal holding costs.

These metrics enable ABC to monitor its inventory efficiency, liquidity, and operational agility, critical for maintaining competitiveness in a fluctuating market.

Performance Comparison Over Two Years

Reviewing ABC's past performance, the company reported a cost of goods sold (COGS) of $750,000 last year, with an inventory investment of $78,000. This year's COGS increased to $800,000, and inventory investment rose slightly to $80,000. The weeks of supply for each year are calculated as:

• Current Year: (Inventory / COGS) × 52 = ($80,000 / $800,000) × 52 ≈ 5.2 weeks
• Last Year: (Inventory / COGS) × 52 = ($78,000 / $750,000) × 52 ≈ 5.4 weeks

Inventory turnover for each year is:

• Current Year: $800,000 / $80,000 = 10
• Last Year: $750,000 / $78,000 ≈ 9.62

This indicates an improvement in inventory efficiency, with higher turnover and slightly reduced weeks of inventory, suggesting better inventory management in the current year. However, sustained increases in COGS and inventory should be monitored to prevent overstocking or obsolescence.

Performance-wise, ABC Company has demonstrated improved inventory turnover, which is favorable for cash flow and profitability. Nonetheless, they must balance this with maintaining sufficient stock levels to meet customer demand, particularly in a competitive retail environment.

Criteria-Based Outsourcing Location Selection

ABC Company is evaluating three foreign locations for outsourcing its call center: Country X, Y, and Z. The approach involves assigning weights to various criteria such as flexibility, trustworthiness, price, and delivery. Scores for each criterion range from 0 (poor) to 10 (excellent). The weights assigned are:

• Flexibility: 0.30
• Trustworthy: 0.25
• Price: 0.20
• Delivery: 0.15

The scores for each country are as follows:

• Country X: Flexibility (8), Trustworthy (7), Price (6), Delivery (7)
• Country Y: Flexibility (7), Trustworthy (8), Price (5), Delivery (6)
• Country Z: Flexibility (6), Trustworthy (6), Price (8), Delivery (7)

Calculating the weighted scores involves multiplying each score by its corresponding weight and summing these for each country:

For Country X:

(8×0.30) + (7×0.25) + (6×0.20) + (7×0.15) = 2.4 + 1.75 + 1.2 + 1.05 = 6.4

For Country Y:

(7×0.30) + (8×0.25) + (5×0.20) + (6×0.15) = 2.1 + 2.0 + 1.0 + 0.9 = 6.0

For Country Z:

(6×0.30) + (6×0.25) + (8×0.20) + (7×0.15) = 1.8 + 1.5 + 1.6 + 1.05 = 6.95

Based on the total weighted scores, Country Z emerges as the most suitable outsourcing location due to the highest score of 6.95, indicating it offers the best combination of criteria aligned with the company's priorities. Therefore, ABC should consider selecting Country Z, as it balances cost, reliability, and flexibility effectively.

Make or Buy Decision Analysis

Determining whether to manufacture a component in-house or outsource hinges upon evaluating fixed and variable costs against expected demand. The details are:

• In-house: Fixed Cost = $80,000; Variable Cost per unit = $10
• Outsource: Fixed Cost = $120,000; Variable Cost per unit = $5

To find the break-even demand, set total costs equal:

In-house: 80,000 + 10×D = Outsource: 120,000 + 5×D

Simplifying:

80,000 - 120,000 = 5D - 10D

-40,000 = -5D

Demand (D) = 40,000 / 5 = 8,000 units

This means that at an annual demand of 8,000 units, both options cost the same. For demands higher than 8,000 units, outsourcing becomes more economical, whereas for lower demand, manufacturing in-house is preferable.

At a demand of 10,000 units, total costs are:

In-house: 80,000 + (10×10,000) = 80,000 + 100,000 = $180,000

Outsource: 120,000 + (5×10,000) = 120,000 + 50,000 = $170,000

Therefore, outsourcing is the recommended strategy at this demand level, as it reduces total costs. Additionally, the analysis confirms that if forecasted demand exceeds 8,000 units, outsourcing provides significant savings, aligning with the conclusion that for demands greater than 5,000 units (as assessed), outsourcing is the more cost-effective choice.

Economic Outlook and Retail Industry Forecast

The predictive analysis of unemployment rates indicates a decrease in unemployment from recent years, with forecasts suggesting a rate of approximately 6.7% in 2016. Since unemployment is inversely related to consumer spending, a reduction in unemployment levels typically results in increased consumer expenditure, which benefits retail stores.

Over the last 55 years, unemployment rates in the US have fluctuated, influenced by macroeconomic policies, technological changes, and global economic conditions. The linear regression model used in the analysis shows a positive correlation between the year and unemployment; however, the significance level suggests cautious interpretation of this trend.

Considering the projection for 2016, the decreasing trend implies that more individuals will be employed, thereby increasing disposable income and boosting retail sales. Retailers should capitalize on this optimistic outlook by expanding product lines, improving customer experience, and investing in online sales channels to leverage the rising trend of digital shopping.

Furthermore, other factors such as technological advancements, preferences shifting towards online shopping, and increased competition within the retail sector are expected to impact future sales. Online purchases have augmented significantly, driven by internet accessibility and the presence of e-commerce giants like Amazon, which necessitates brick-and-mortar retailers to adopt online strategies to remain competitive.

In conclusion, the economic forecasts suggest a favorable environment for retail growth, contingent upon strategic adaptation to technological trends and competitive pressures. Retailers that innovate, diversify sales channels, and focus on customer loyalty are better positioned to benefit from decreasing unemployment rates and an improving economic climate.

References

• Abel, A. B., & Bernanke, B. (2006). Macroeconomics. Boston: Pearson.
• Arnold, R. A. (2010). Macroeconomics. Mason, OH: Cengage Learning, South Western.
• Gupta, I. C., Jaroliya, D., & Prestige Institute of Management and Research. (2008). IT enabled practices and emerging management paradigms. Indore: Prestige Institute of Management and Research.
• Krafft, M., & Mantrala, M. K. (2010). Retailing in the 21st century: Current and future trends. Heidelberg: Springer.
• Gordon, R. J. (2012). The Rise and Fall of American Growth: The U.S. Standard of Living since the Civil War. Princeton University Press.
• Fisher, I. (1933). The Debt-Deflation Theory of Great Depressions. Econometrica, 1(4), 337-357.
• Stock, J. H., & Watson, M. W. (2015). Introduction to Econometrics. Pearson.
• Romer, D. (2012). Advanced Macroeconomics. McGraw-Hill Education.
• International Monetary Fund. (2020). World Economic Outlook – April 2020. IMF Publications.
• U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2023). Unemployment Rate - Monthly Review. BLS.