Abstracted Outline: Begin Your Review Of The Theoretical And
Abstracted Outlinebegin Your Review Of The Theoretical And Research Li
Abstracted Outline begin your review of the theoretical and research literature to support for your Integrative Project: Chapters 1–5. Keep in mind that you will demonstrate, via a thorough review of the literature, what represents best practices in a practice or specialization in psychology. At this point in the development of your literature review, you should be able to identify 16 to 25 sources that support the development of the abstracted outline. Create and post an abstracted outline of your literature review for your Integrative Project: Chapters 1 to 5. You should present two to three sentences for each subheading, explaining the key points to be covered under that subheading.
This material should be cited in APA style and the outline should conclude with an APA-formatted reference list. Attach your discussion as a Word document set in Times New Roman, 12-point, double-spaced type. In addition, please copy and paste the content into the message box for your post.
Paper For Above instruction
The task involves constructing an abstracted outline for a literature review that supports an Integrative Project in psychology, specifically covering Chapters 1 through 5. This outline should synthesize the existing theoretical and research literature pertinent to the chosen practice or specialization within psychology. The goal is to demonstrate an understanding of best practices supported by scholarly sources.
The outline must include 16 to 25 credible sources, which will underpin the development of the review. Each subheading within the outline should be accompanied by two to three sentences that succinctly summarize the key points to be discussed under that section. This approach ensures a comprehensive yet concise overview of the literature, guiding the development of the full review.
Important to the assignment is adherence to APA citation style throughout the outline, reflecting accurate referencing of all sources. The final submission should be formatted as a Word document, using Times New Roman font, size 12, and double-spacing to facilitate readability and academic standards. The document must be copied and pasted into the post message box for review.
In the broader context, this literature review aims to encapsulate current best practices by critically analyzing relevant research and theoretical frameworks. Such an analysis will delineate effective interventions, conceptual models, and empirical findings that shape the area of psychology in question. This process not only supports academic rigor but also aligns with professional standards for evidence-based practice, thereby establishing a solid foundation for subsequent chapters of the project.
The selection of sources should encompass peer-reviewed journal articles, authoritative books, and reputable online resources. These works should collectively provide a robust foundation from which to draw conclusions about effective approaches and identify gaps or emerging trends in the field. The synthesis of this literature will guide future research directions and practical applications, ultimately contributing to the advancement of psychological practice.
In summary, the outlined task involves creating a detailed, APA-formatted abstracted outline that demonstrates critical engagement with scholarly literature relevant to the chosen area in psychology. This outline will serve as a blueprint for the subsequent comprehensive review, supporting the development of a well-founded and academically rigorous Integrative Project. Through careful synthesis and accurate referencing, this work will exemplify the integration of theory and research necessary for advancing professional standards within the discipline.
References
American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). APA.
Beitz, J. M. (2012). The essential role of evidence-based practice in nursing. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 17(2), Manuscript 1. https://doi.org/10.3912/OJIN.Vol17No02Man01
Brewer, J., & Hunter, A. (2019). Multimethod research: A synthesis of styles. Routledge.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2014). Practical research: Planning and design (10th ed.). Pearson.
Merriam, S. B. (2018). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Salkind, N. J. (2017). Statistics for people who (think they) hate statistics (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Smith, J. A., & Osborn, M. (2015). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (2nd ed., pp. 53–80). SAGE.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. SAGE Publications.