Accessing Early Literacy Skills: Read Chapter 3 Assessing Wo

Accessing Early Literacy Skillsread Chapter 3 Assessing Word Recognit

Accessing Early Literacy Skills Read Chapter 3: Assessing Word Recognition and Reading Fluency (pp. 20-40). This chapter describes several early reading assessments such as Yopp-Singer Test of Phonemic Awareness, Basic Print Concepts, Three Minute Reading Assessments, Common Phonogram Assessment, etc. These tests measure various early literacy skills such as word recognition or sight words, concepts of print, fluency, etc. The following are other sources which describe various early literacy assessments: Concepts about print test . Letter/sound identification. Hearing and recording sounds assessment. Basic phonics skills test. The names test: A quick assessment of decoding ability. Writing vocabulary . Words their way spelling inventory . San diego quick assessment of reading eligibility . Taking running records . An example of an informal reading inventory. Pick any one of these assessments and conduct further research on it. You can do a Google search, interview an early reading teacher, etc. In your posting: Describe the purpose of the assessment. What is it supposed to measure? The procedures of the assessment. How would you administer it? The rationale. Why is it important to measure this early reading skill? The implications for your classroom . How would you use the assessment to inform your classroom practice?

Paper For Above instruction

The assessment selected for detailed analysis is the "Running Records," an essential tool for evaluating early reading progress. Developed by Marie M. Clay, this assessment provides teachers with a nuanced understanding of a child's reading behaviors, strengths, and areas needing support. The primary purpose of running records is to observe and document a child's reading fluency, accuracy, and comprehension during oral reading encounters. It gauges various sub-skills such as decoding strategies, sight word recognition, and comprehension levels, offering invaluable insights into a child's reading development journey.

The procedures for administering a running record involve selecting an appropriate text that matches the child's reading level. The teacher observes and records the child's reading behaviors verbatim, noting errors, self-corrections, pauses, and responses to comprehension questions. Typically, the student reads aloud from a grade-appropriate passage for one minute while the teacher records each word read, errors, and self-corrections using standardized symbols. This process allows the teacher to calculate reading accuracy, fluency rate, and comprehension performance. The test is usually administered one-on-one in a quiet setting to ensure accurate observation without distractions. Following the reading, the teacher analyzes the recorded data to determine the child's instructional reading level and inform instruction.

The rationale for employing running records as an early literacy assessment is rooted in the need to individuate instruction and monitor growth. Early reading success is crucial for overall academic achievement, and running records enable educators to identify specific instructional needs, such as decoding strategies or sight word recognition. They are also instrumental in differentiating instruction within diverse classrooms, ensuring that interventions are targeted and effective. Regular use of running records fosters ongoing assessment and reflection, allowing teachers to adapt instruction swiftly and attend to each child's unique reading development trajectory.

In the classroom, running records serve as an essential formative assessment tool. I would use the data to inform my instructional practices by grouping students according to their reading levels, tailoring reading activities, and selecting appropriate texts for guided reading sessions. For children struggling with decoding, targeted phonics instruction could be implemented, while fluent readers might be challenged with higher-level texts to promote comprehension skills. Additionally, tracking progress over time through repeated running record assessments helps to evaluate the effectiveness of instructional strategies and demonstrates growth. Overall, integrating running records into daily routines promotes a data-driven approach to literacy instruction, ensuring that each student receives the support they need to become confident, proficient readers.

References

• Clay, M. M. (1995). What classrooms reveal about reading, writing, and early literacy: The children's version of the running records. Heinemann.
• Leslie, L. (2014). Running Records: Observation and Data Collection for Early Literacy. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 14(2), 195-210.
• Heineke, A. J., & Carpenter, B. (2020). Using Running Records to Differentiate Instruction. Reading Teacher, 73(4), 435-439.
• Fountas, I. C., & Pinnell, G. S. (2017). Matching books to readers: Using units of text complexity and student interest. Heinemann.
• Hoffman, J. (2011). The importance of formative assessment in early reading instruction. Educational Researcher, 40(2), 79-90.
• Sands, T. (2016). Conducting Effective Running Records: A Practical Guide. Early Childhood Education Journal, 44(3), 297-305.
• Silver, S., & Smith, R. (2018). Differentiating Reading Instruction with Running Records. Exceptional Children, 84(2), 178-193.
• Marshall, S. (2019). Monitoring Progress in Early Literacy: Strategies and Tools. Journal of Literacy Research, 51(1), 55-70.
• National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching Children to Read: An Evidence-Based Assessment of the Scientific Research Literature on Reading and Its Implications for Reading Instruction. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
• Tompkins, G. E. (2015). Literacy for the 21st Century: A Balanced Approach. Pearson.