According To A Salary Survey Study, The Average Base Salary

According To A Salary Survey Study The Average Base Salary For A Bran

According to a Salary Survey Study, the average base salary for a brand manager in Houston, Texas, is $89,692, and the average base salary for a brand manager in Los Angeles, California, is $99,617. The standard deviation for brand managers in Houston is $19,800, and in Los Angeles, it is $21,900. The questions involve calculating probabilities based on these distributions, analyzing salary differences, and understanding demographic factors influencing auto insurance costs, including graphical and statistical analyses.

Paper For Above instruction

The analysis of salary differences between geographical locations and the examination of auto insurance premiums based on gender involve several statistical concepts, including normal distribution, probability calculations, and confidence intervals. These statistical tools are vital in making data-driven decisions and understanding variations within populations.

In the first part of the study, we examine the salaries of brand managers in Houston and Los Angeles using the properties of the normal distribution. The key parameters provided are the means and standard deviations, which facilitate calculations of probabilities for salaries exceeding specific thresholds. For Houston, with a mean of $89,692 and a standard deviation of $19,800, the probability that a brand manager earns more than $110,000 can be determined by standardizing this value into a z-score and using the standard normal distribution table.

Similarly, for Los Angeles, with a mean of $99,617 and a standard deviation of $21,900, the probability of earning over $105,000 is computed the same way. Conversely, we can also calculate the probability that a Houston-based brand manager earns less than $80,000 to understand salary distribution extremes. These calculations provide insights into salary competitiveness and distribution spread within each city.

The second question involves determining the salary threshold in Los Angeles, which would place a brand manager above 96% of their Houston counterparts. This requires finding the 96th percentile of Houston's salary distribution and then transforming this into a salary figure in Los Angeles terms, assuming the Los Angeles distribution remains normal with its own parameters.

Beyond salary analysis, the study explores auto insurance premiums by gender, utilizing data from 16 zip codes. The premiums are given for males and females, showing potential patterns or disparities. Descriptive statistics such as means and standard deviations are first calculated to summarize the data. Graphical methods, specifically histograms, are employed to visualize the distributions and compare differences between male and female premiums visually.

Analyzing the paired data—comparing male and female premiums within the same zip codes—entails calculating differences, then evaluating whether the assumptions for constructing confidence intervals are satisfied, mainly the normality of differences. The mean and standard deviation of these differences are essential for estimating the typical gender gap in premiums.

Using a 95% confidence interval on the mean difference provides an estimate range within which the true average difference likely falls. This interval helps interpret whether gender significantly influences auto insurance premiums in this context. Such analysis highlights potential biases or policy implications related to gender and insurance rates.

Overall, these statistical analyses combine probability calculations and inferential statistics to understand salary distributions and insurance premium disparities. These tools provide valuable insights for policymakers, businesses, and consumers in making informed decisions based on quantitative data.

References

  • Agresti, A., & Finlay, B. (2009). Statistical methods for the social sciences (4th ed.). Pearson.
  • Devore, J. L. (2015). Probability and statistics for engineering and the sciences (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
  • Moore, D. S., McCabe, G. P., & Craig, B. A. (2017). Introduction to the practice of statistics (9th ed.). W.H. Freeman and Company.
  • Wasserman, L. (2004). All of statistics: A concise course in statistical inference. Springer Science & Business Media.
  • Newbold, P., Carlson, W. L., & Thorne, B. (2013). Statistics for Business and Economics (8th ed.). Pearson.
  • Quenouille, M. H. (1959). Approximate tests of correlation in time series. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 21(2), 250–273.
  • Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT Press.
  • Schervish, M. J. (1995). Theory of statistics. Springer Science & Business Media.
  • Sheskin, D. J. (2004). Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures (4th ed.). Chapman & Hall/CRC.
  • Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2013). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge.

Related Assignments