According To Norman Bowie In Relativism And Moral Obligation

According To Norman Bowie In Relativism And The Moral Obligations Of

According to Norman Bowie in “Relativism and the Moral Obligations of Multinational Corporations,” basic ethical principles do not vary among cultures. Defend or criticize this conclusion. Prepare a word response in APA 6th ed. format. Your paper must include required readings (Beauchamp, T. L., Bowie, N., & Arnold, D. (2009). Ethical Theory and Business, (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall) and at least two external references.

Paper For Above instruction

According To Norman Bowie In Relativism And The Moral Obligations Of

Norman Bowie’s discussion of moral obligations within the context of multinational corporations highlights a significant debate in ethical theory: whether ethical principles are universal or culturally relative. In his article “Relativism and the Moral Obligations of Multinational Corporations,” Bowie challenges cultural relativism by affirming that fundamental ethical principles are invariant across cultures. This stance invites both support and critique from various scholarly perspectives, necessitating a nuanced exploration of the issue.

At the core of Bowie’s argument is the premise that moral principles such as justice, honesty, and respect for human rights are universally valid. He contends that despite cultural differences in practices and customs, such principles serve as a moral foundation that transcends cultural boundaries. The universality of these principles aligns with the Kantian view of ethics, which Bowie adopts, emphasizing duties that are applicable irrespective of cultural contexts (Beauchamp, Bowie, & Arnold, 2009).

Defending Bowie’s position involves emphasizing the importance of moral consistency and the recognition of human rights as a shared foundation for ethical conduct. For instance, human rights frameworks established by organizations like the United Nations reflect universal principles that should be upheld regardless of local customs (Donnelly, 2003). Furthermore, supporting universality prevents ethical relativism from excusing human rights abuses and unethical practices, such as child labor or environmental degradation, justified by cultural norms.

Conversely, critics argue that Bowie’s stance may overlook the cultural differences that shape ethical beliefs. Cultural relativists emphasize that moral values are deeply embedded within specific societal contexts and that imposing universal principles risks cultural imperialism (Hofstede, 2001). This perspective suggests that ethical judgments should consider cultural norms and practices to ensure respect for diversity. For instance, practices surrounding gender roles or communal responsibilities vary significantly across cultures and challenge the notion of a single set of universal principles.

Despite these critiques, the assertion that basic ethical principles do not vary among cultures gains support from the idea that certain moral values are necessary for the functioning of a just and equitable global society. Principles such as fairness, non-maleficence, and respect for autonomy serve as moral anchors that support international cooperation and peace (Rawls, 1999). Moreover, this view aligns with the ethical theory of moral objectivism, which affirms that moral truths are objectively valid and not culturally contingent (Shafer-Landau, 2012).

In evaluating Bowie’s conclusion, it is essential to balance respect for cultural diversity with the imperative to uphold fundamental human rights and ethical standards. While cultural practices must be acknowledged and understood, they should not justify violations of basic moral principles. Ultimately, the universality of core ethical principles provides a robust ethical framework necessary for addressing global issues and fostering cross-cultural understanding.

References

• Beauchamp, T. L., Bowie, N., & Arnold, D. (2009). Ethical Theory and Business (8th ed.). Pearson/Prentice Hall.
• Donnelly, J. (2003). Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice. Cornell University Press.
• Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations across Nations. Sage Publications.
• Rawls, J. (1999). The Law of Peoples. Harvard University Press.
• Shafer-Landau, R. (2012). The Fundamentals of Ethics (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.