According To Paul Krugman: The Complex Multiplier For The Un

According To Paul Krugman The Complex Multiplier For The United State

According to Paul Krugman, the complex multiplier for the United States is about equal to 2. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 earmarked $787 billion in deficit spending, of which $330.4 billion was spent in 2009. Total government deficits for 2009 were $1,251.7 billion. The increase in nominal GDP from 2009 to 2010 was $541.2 billion (3.8%). If we assume that this growth resulted from the ARRA stimulus package, what was the implied multiplier associated with the stimulus package?

Paper For Above instruction

The concept of the fiscal multiplier is central to understanding how government spending, particularly fiscal stimulus, influences economic activity. The multiplier effect measures the change in real GDP resulting from a change in autonomous spending, such as government expenditure. In this analysis, we examine the implied multiplier associated with the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009 using available data provided by Paul Krugman and relevant economic measures.

The ARRA, enacted in response to the 2008 financial crisis, aimed to stimulate economic growth by increasing government spending amid a recessionary environment. According to the provided data, the government allocated a total of $787 billion for stimulus purposes, with significant portions spent in 2009 ($330.4 billion). Total government deficits for that year reached $1,251.7 billion. Despite these large fiscal deficits, the observed increase in nominal GDP from 2009 to 2010 was $541.2 billion, representing a 3.8% growth rate.

To estimate the implied fiscal multiplier, the standard approach involves dividing the change in GDP attributable to the stimulus by the amount of the stimulus spent. Assuming, for simplicity of analysis, that the entire GDP growth of $541.2 billion stemmed from the ARRA stimulus, the calculation proceeds as follows:

\[

\text{Implied Multiplier} = \frac{\text{Change in GDP}}{\text{Stimulus Spending}}

\]

Substituting the known values:

\[

\text{Implied Multiplier} = \frac{\$541.2\ \text{billion}}{\$330.4\ \text{billion}} \approx 1.636

\]

This calculation suggests an implied multiplier of approximately 1.64, indicating that for every dollar spent under the ARRA, about $1.64 of economic output was generated. It is essential to recognize that this simplified estimate assumes a direct causal relationship between the stimulus and GDP growth, not accounting for other factors such as private sector activity, monetary policy, or external economic influences.

Paul Krugman, in his analyses, posits that the multiplier for such fiscal interventions in the U.S. context could be around 2, reflecting a relatively significant impact of government spending on economic activity during downturns. Our calculated multiplier of approximately 1.64 aligns reasonably well with this figure, considering the complexities and multiple influences on GDP.

Furthermore, various empirical studies have found multipliers in the range of 1.5 to 2 during recession periods, which supports Krugman's optimistic view regarding the effectiveness of fiscal stimulus (Auerbach & Gorodnichenko, 2012; Blanchard & Leigh, 2013). The relatively high multiplier underscores the importance of strategic fiscal policy during economic downturns to promote recovery and mitigate unemployment.

In conclusion, based on the provided data, the implied fiscal multiplier associated with the ARRA stimulus package is approximately 1.64. This suggests that government spending in this context was quite effective in stimulating economic growth, consistent with Krugman’s perspective on the potency of fiscal policy during recessions. Policymakers can leverage such insights to optimize future fiscal interventions, especially during periods of economic slack to maximize the positive impact on output and employment.

References

  • Auerbach, A. J., & Gorodnichenko, Y. (2012). Output spillovers from fiscal policy. NBER Working Paper No. 18578.
  • Blanchard, O., & Leigh, D. (2013). Growth forecast errors and fiscal multipliers. IMF Working Paper WP/13/1.
  • Krugman, P. (2009). The Return of Depression Economics and the Crisis of 2008. W. W. Norton & Company.
  • Ramey, V. A. (2011). Can government purchases stimulate the economy? Journal of Economic Literature, 49(3), 673-685.
  • Barro, R. J., & Redlick, C. J. (2011). Macroeconomic effects from government purchases and taxes. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(1), 51-102.
  • Leith, C., et al. (2014). The fiscal multiplier: Evidence from the 2008-09 financial crisis. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, 44, 33-46.
  • Romer, C. D., & Romer, D. H. (2010). The macroeconomic effects of fiscal policy: Estimates based on credible identification strategies. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(4), 83-102.
  • Taylor, J. B. (2013). Assessing Fiscal Policy in the Aftermath of the Great Recession. Presidential Address to the Society of Economic Dynamics.
  • Friedman, M. (1956). The Role of Monetary Policy. American Economic Review, 46(3), 117-124.
  • Gali, J. (2015). Monetary Policy, Inflation, and the Business Cycle: An Introduction to the New Keynesian Framework. Princeton University Press.

Related Assignments