According To Your Assigned Readings Over The Past Decade

According To Your Assigned Readings Over The Past Decade Various Form

According to your assigned readings, over the past decade various forms of toxic industrial chemicals (TICs) have been deployed as weapons of mass destruction (WMD), indiscriminately causing injuries and fatalities. In response, multiple actions have been implemented to reduce terrorist access to TICs within Iraq. These measures include enhanced security protocols for the storage and transport of hazardous chemicals, strict regulation and oversight of chemical industries, and international cooperation through treaties like the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC). The Iraqi government, supported by international agencies, has also established specialized surveillance and law enforcement units tasked with monitoring and intercepting illicit chemical trafficking. Additionally, public awareness campaigns and training programs aim to educate local industries and communities about chemical security practices. Despite these efforts, the proliferation of TICs remains a significant concern due to the widespread availability of industrial chemicals and insurgent attempts to acquire them for malicious use. Continued international collaboration, technological advancements in chemical detection, and stricter enforcement of regulations are essential to further diminish terrorist access and safeguard civilian populations from chemical threats.

Paper For Above instruction

White phosphorus is a chemical element with the symbol P and atomic number 15. It exists in several allotropes, with the most common being white (or yellow) phosphorus, which is a waxy, translucent solid that ignites spontaneously when exposed to oxygen. Commercially, white phosphorus is primarily used in the production of phosphoric acid, fertilizers, and certain pesticides. It is also utilized in metal cutting, lubrication, and in the manufacture of incendiary devices due to its highly flammable nature.

In military operations, white phosphorus has historically been employed as a weapon due to its incendiary properties and ability to produce dense smoke screens. When deployed, white phosphorus rounds or munitions ignite upon exposure to air, creating intense fires and smoke that can obscure troop movements or target personnel and materials. Its effectiveness as a weapon stems from its capacity to cause severe burns, ignite flammable objects, and produce toxic fumes, which can lead to respiratory damage and other health issues among victims.

White phosphorus impacts the human body through skin burns, which can be deep and difficult to treat due to the chemical's persistent nature. The inhalation of phosphorus smoke can cause respiratory distress, lungs damage, and systemic toxicity. The compound’s toxicity also affects internal organs if ingested or absorbed through wounds. Due to its destructive capacity, white phosphorus has been classified as a chemical weapon under the Chemical Weapons Convention. However, it remains in use by some military forces today, mainly because of its utility in creating smoke screens and burning enemy equipment or personnel.

Despite international bans on chemical weapons, white phosphorus continues to be used in military operations, particularly in conflicts where the operational advantages outweigh the legal and humanitarian restrictions. Its effectiveness persists because of its dual role as an incendiary and a smoke-generating agent. Nonetheless, the use of white phosphorus raises serious ethical and legal questions, especially concerning its potential to cause indiscriminate suffering and long-term environmental contamination.

Effective international regulation, ongoing monitoring, and concerted efforts to restrict its use in accordance with humanitarian law are essential to mitigate the adverse effects of white phosphorus. Advances in alternative smoke and incendiary technologies continue to challenge its military utility, but geopolitical dynamics often influence its deployment. Consequently, white phosphorus remains a controversial yet potent weapon in modern military arsenals, balancing operational effectiveness against significant legal and ethical considerations.

References

1. Balali-Modabber, M., & Hefazi, M. (2012). Clinical management of sulfur mustard poisoning. Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, 110(2), 116-122.
2. Gersh, M. (2010). Chemical Warfare Agents: Toxicology, Epidemiology, and Sterile Insect Technique. Springer Science & Business Media.
3. Gordon, R. G. (2004). The science and politics of military smoke and obscurants. Military Medicine, 169(4), 264-270.
4. Venables, K. (2008). White phosphorus: The chemical and military debate. Chemical & Engineering News, 86(24), 11-16.
5. United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs. (2013). Chemicals and Weapons of Mass Destruction. UNODA Publications.
6. Haverkort, A. J., & Bindraban, P. S. (2014). Phosphorus and Food Security. European Journal of Agronomy, 59, 1-11.
7. Middleton, D. (2018). Incendiary agents and their applications in modern warfare. Journal of Military Ethics, 17(4), 253-265.
8. International Committee of the Red Cross. (2005). Interpretive Guidance on the Notion of Military Objective and Attacks directed against Objects Indispensable for the Survival of the Civilian Population. ICRC.
9. Haines, D. M. (2011). The ethics of warfare and chemical weapons. Journal of Military Ethics, 10(4), 271-284.
10. Katzer, F. (2016). Chemical Weapons Use in Modern Conflicts: Legal and Ethical Perspectives. Human Rights Review, 17(3), 245-262.