Accounting Stellar Packaging Products Decision

Accountingstellar Packaging Products Decided To Use A Predetermined Ov

Accounting Stellar Packaging Products decided to use a predetermined overhead rate to apply manufacturing overhead to jobs. The company’s controller, Robin Simmons, is contemplating which denominator-level driver would be more appropriate: printing press machine hours or direct labor hours. Employees work in crews of four to six employees, and there are more direct labor hours than printing press machine hours. The decision influences how overhead costs are allocated and impacts the accuracy of cost reporting. It also has implications for under- or over-applied overhead, affecting profit margins and pricing strategies.

Paper For Above instruction

The selection of an appropriate overhead application base is crucial for maintaining accurate product costing and ensuring the effectiveness of managerial decisions. When a manufacturing company like Stellar Packaging Products evaluates whether to base overhead on printing press machine hours or direct labor hours, it must consider the nature of the production process, the traits of the cost drivers, and the strategic direction of the firm.

Choosing the right denominator-level driver is instrumental in accurately reflecting the consumption of overhead resources. In Stellar’s case, the company’s controller, Robin Simmons, notes a higher total of direct labor hours compared to printing press machine hours. This observation suggests that labor hours are more prevalent and perhaps more representative of overall activity levels associated with manufacturing costs.

Analysis of Suitable Cost Driver

The predominant use of direct labor hours as a basis for overhead application is rooted in traditional costing practices. Historically, direct labor was considered the primary cost driver, especially in industries where manufacturing processes are labor-intensive. When labor hours are more numerous and closely correlated to overhead consumption, using them as the denominator provides a more accurate cost allocation. It simplifies the estimation process and aligns with the historical precedence of labor-based costing methods.

On the other hand, employing machine hours as the allocation base might be advantageous in highly automated, capital-intensive environments. Advances in technology have shifted some manufacturing overhead costs from direct labor to machinery and automation, making machine hours a potentially more precise driver in such contexts. However, in Stellar’s production environment, where crews are relatively small and work in fluctuating teams, and where there are more labor hours than machine hours, this shift may not be justified.

Implications of Driver Choice on Under- or Over-applied Overhead

The choice between using printing press machine hours or direct labor hours directly influences the likelihood of under- or over-applied overhead. If the selected driver does not accurately reflect the actual consumption of overhead resources, the company might experience significant discrepancies at period end.

For example, if machine hours are chosen in a situation where overhead costs are primarily driven by labor activities, this could lead to under-applied overhead because machine hours would underestimate the actual overhead incurred during production. Conversely, using labor hours in a highly automated environment where machinery consumes most overhead could lead to over-applied overhead because the burden is allocated more heavily to labor than justified.

In Stellar’s scenario, since there are more labor hours, using direct labor hours would likely result in a more balanced and accurate allocation. This can help prevent issues such as inflated job costs or understated margins, which occur when overhead is misapplied.

Strategic Considerations for Future Cost Behavior

Furthermore, the decision must consider the company's strategic trajectory. If Stellar plans to automate further and reduce manual labor, shifting toward machine hours might be appropriate in the future. For instance, if the company invests in advanced printing presses and automation, machine hours may better reflect actual resource usage. This aligns with the modern trend of activity-based costing, which seeks to assign overhead more precisely based on actual activities.

Conversely, if the company's strategic focus remains on labor-intensive manufacturing, continuing to base overhead on labor hours may be preferable. It ensures consistent costing and pricing strategies aligned with current operational practices.

Conclusion

Given Stellar’s current operational environment, where employees work in crews of four to six and the number of labor hours exceeds machine hours, direct labor hours are a more appropriate basis for overhead application. This approach aligns with traditional costing methodologies, provides greater accuracy under current conditions, and minimizes the risk of significant misallocations that could distort product costs and margins.

However, management should continually reassess the cost drivers as the company evolves. If automation increases and labor becomes less significant relative to machinery, shifting toward machine hours may improve cost accuracy over time. This flexibility ensures that overhead allocation remains congruent with actual resource consumption and supports sound managerial decision-making.

In summary, the optimal choice for Stellar Packaging Products, based on current operational data, is to allocate overhead using direct labor hours, considering the implications for cost accuracy and overhead application variances.

References

• Garrison, R. H., Noreen, E. W., & Brewer, P. C. (2015). Managerial Accounting (15th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Horngren, C. T., Datar, S. M., & Rajan, M. (2012). Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis (14th ed.). Pearson.
• Drury, C. (2013). Management and Cost Accounting (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Kaplan, R. S., & Anderson, S. R. (2004). Time-driven activity-based costing. Harvard Business Review, 82(11), 131–138.
• Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality. (2015). Healthcare cost and utilization project (HCUP). AHRQ Publications.
• Walston, S. L. (2012). Strategic Cost Management. Business Expert Press.
• Bearder, C., Carter, J., & Harve, J. (2013). Transforming healthcare: Reimagining health services for an interconnected world. Journal of Healthcare Management, 58(1), 8–15.
• Turney, J. M. (2014). Activity-Based Costing in Manufacturing Environments. Journal of Cost Management, 28(3), 24–30.
• Innes, J., & Mitchell, F. (1995). Activity-Based Costing in the UK’s Largest Companies. Management Accounting Research, 6(2), 137–153.
• Stahl, R. R., & McClain, M. (2017). Cost Allocation Methodologies. Journal of Applied Management Accounting Research, 15(2), 45–59.