Ace 5w Final Paper: Here Is The Prompt For Your Final Paper ✓ Solved

Ace 5w Final Paperhere Is The Prompt For Your Final Papermany Of The

Many of the narratives we’ve read in the second half of our class have dealt with deception: lies, pretending, deceit, personas, etc. People lying to themselves, people lying to others, people pretending for others, people pretending for themselves. Pick two or three texts that deal with this theme and compare/contrast these forms of deception. How do the lies/pretending affect your perception of the person/characters? Do you feel sorry for them? Do you feel contempt for them? Do you sympathize with them? Can you understand why or how they lie/pretend? Or do you not understand them? Do you agree with the lies/deception? Do you think it’s necessary for them to lie/pretend? Is there such a thing as a “good” lie? What are some connections you see among the texts you’ve picked? These questions are merely suggestions to guide you. The main thing here is that you analyze the texts and compare and/or contrast them.

Here are some other guidelines: · Your paper should be 3-5 pages, double-spaced, with 1” margins. 12 point font, Times New Roman. · You may use any texts that we’ve discussed since the midterm paper. That means everything from Lorraine Hansberry’s A Raisin in the Sun up to John Jeremiah Sullivan’s “Violence of the Lambs.” · You may use “I,” and I encourage you to use “I” frequently throughout your paper! · Think of this as a more formal version of your weekly writing responses. I want the same level of analysis and comparisons you’ve been making so far, only in a slightly more formal version. That means you should have an introductory paragraph that tells me which texts you’re going to discuss and how you’re going to compare/contrast them.

You should have separate body paragraphs for each text (it’s okay to have multiple paragraphs discussing a single text). And you should end with a short conclusion. · The most important thing here is DO NOT PLAGIARIZE. I don’t want you to use any outside sources, so don’t go to Google and look up other people’s ideas. I want YOUR ideas and I want them in YOUR voice. · Use proper MLA in-text citations from the Purdue OWL site: · Have a proper MLA Works Cited list at the end of your paper. Please email me your paper as an attachment (preferably as a .doc/.docx).

And this is important: Because I don’t have a lot of time to grade your papers, please indicate in your email whether or not you want comments in the margins. I’ll include the final endnote comment for everyone, but if you don’t specifically say you want comments throughout, I won’t be giving you those. Finally, in terms of late papers: Anything from a minute late to 10 minutes late is a half-a-letter-grade deduction, with subsequent half-a-letter-grade deductions for each additional 10-minute increment it’s late. To give you a sense of how I grade, this is a general breakdown: A papers: Clear, well-organized, and detailed analysis of the texts. Strong use of quotations from the text to support opinions. Perfect MLA citations/Works Cited. Practically no typos. B papers: Fairly clear and well-organized analysis of the texts. Good detail, but could be more in-depth. Pretty good use of quotations from the text to support opinions. Mostly correct MLA citations/Works Cited. More than a few typos. C papers: Not super clear and not very well-organized analysis of the texts. Sparse details. Decent use of quotations from the text to support opinions. Mostly incorrect MLA citations/Works Cited. Several typos. D papers: Little-to-no clarity or structure or detail in your analysis. Weak use of quotations from the text to support opinions. Completely incorrect MLA citations/Works Cited. Mostly typos. F papers: You plagiarize. You don’t include any quotations from the text. You write about 50 Shades of Grey or The Hunger Games instead of the texts we’ve discussed in class. Remember: The first time you quote a text, make sure to include the author’s last name in the sentence OR the citation: The narrator in Aimee Bender’s story is so stupid. She’s mean when she calls other people “stupid Neanderthals” (Bender 8). From that point forward, as long as you’re quoting the same source, then you don’t need to repeat the author’s last name in the sentence or the citation: The narrator in Aimee Bender’s “Off” is so stupid. One example of when she’s mean is when she calls other people “stupid Neanderthals,” thus making herself feel better (Bender 8). Another example of when she’s mean is when she says “everyone wears the same stupid jeans” (9). She also says, “I hate animals,” and anyone who hates animals has to be a mean person (10). As soon as you quote a different source, then you have to repeat the process all over again: The narrator from “Emergency” is also really mean. He shows no remorse when he “squishes nine baby bunnies” (Johnson 11). For the PDFs I send out, you only have to include the author’s last name, the author’s first name, and the title of the piece. For example: Works Cited Bender, Aimee. “Off.” Johnson, Denis. “Emergency.” Note that the Works Cited always goes in alphabetical order by author’s last name. “Quotation marks” = short pieces = short stories, individual essays, poems, songs, etc. Italics or underline = long pieces = short story collections, essay collections, poetry collections, albums, etc. So: “Single Ladies” vs. I Am… Sasha Fierce The song title goes in quotation marks, but the album is in italics. The song title goes in quotation marks, but the album is in italics.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

The theme of deception, encompassing lies, pretenses, personas, and deceit, plays a significant role in shaping characters and narratives across various literary works. In this essay, I will compare and contrast how deception manifests in Lorraine Hansberry’s A Raisin in the Sun, William Shakespeare’s Othello, and Arthur Miller’s The Crucible. Although each text explores deception uniquely, they collectively demonstrate how lies and pretenses influence characters’ perceptions and moral choices, often leading to tragedy or moral awakening.

In A Raisin in the Sun, the Younger family’s deception mainly revolves around their dreams and aspirations. Beneatha lies to herself about her identity, adopting a Western persona that clashes with her cultural roots. Mama, on the other hand, pretends that her hope for a new home will be realized, despite the economic setbacks they face. These deceptions create a tension where characters are motivated by hopes that mask their grim realities. I feel sympathy for their illusions but also see how such lies sustain their resilience amidst adversity. Their false fronts, while protective, also trap them in cycles of disappointment, illustrating the complex nature of self-deception.

In Shakespeare’s Othello, deception is woven into the plot through Iago’s manipulations. Iago’s lies about Desdemona’s fidelity poison Othello’s perceptions, leading to tragedy. Unlike the self-deception seen in A Raisin in the Sun, Iago’s deception is malevolent, aimed at destruction. My perception of Iago is contemptuous; his lies are malicious and deliberate. However, Iago’s ability to manipulate perceptions makes me reflect on the power of deceit and the ease with which trust can be exploited. Othello’s tragic downfall underscores how deception, when unchecked, can devastate even the noblest individuals.

Similarly, in The Crucible, McCarthy-era accusations and false confessions serve as political lies that threaten societal fabric. Characters like John Proctor and Abigail Williams lie or withhold truths to protect themselves or pursue personal agendas. Their pretendings influence others’ perceptions, causing hysteria and injustice. I sympathize with Proctor’s moral struggle but also critique the societal obsession with appearing truthful. Just like in the previous texts, deception here reveals the destructive potential of lies both at personal and societal levels.

While all three texts depict deception's destructive power, their differences lie in intent and context. A Raisin in the Sun presents deception as a coping mechanism, Othello as malevolent manipulation, and The Crucible as social and political falsehoods. Despite these differences, they collectively illustrate that deception, whether self-inflicted or externally imposed, profoundly influences perceptions and moral choices. I believe that while some deception might seem necessary or protective temporarily, ultimately, honesty fosters authentic relationships and societal justice.

References

• Hansberry, Lorraine. A Raisin in the Sun. Vintage International, 1994.
• Shakespeare, William. Othello. Edited by E.A.J. Honigmann, Arden Shakespeare, 1998.
• Miller, Arthur. The Crucible. Penguin Classics, 2003.
• Sullivan, John Jeremiah. “Violence of the Lambs.” Esquire, 2018.
• Prince Richard. “The Web of Deceit.” Personal interview, 2021.