Acting On Your Recommendation That The Retiring Purchasing M
Acting On Your Recommendation That The Retiring Purchasing Manager Be
Because of the different packaging available in the two countries, and the different skill levels in packaging, the parts per container are different between the two countries. From Country A, any of the 5 parts will fit 1,000 per container; from Country B, any of the 5 parts will fit 800 per container. The ocean freight costs for a 40' container are estimated to be similar to ocean freight from Brisbane, Australia, to New York City for Country A, and from Tokyo, Japan, to New York City for Country B. Specific cost estimates for ocean freight are $5,000 for Brisbane and $4,400 for Tokyo. The products and costs are as follows:
- Product 1: 10 Reds (Country A), 9 Greens (Country B)
- Product 2: 2 Reds, 2.2 Greens
- Product 3: 7 Reds, 4 Greens
- Product 4: 5 Reds, 5 Greens
- Product 5: 4 Reds, 4.5 Greens
The currencies are converted as follows: $1 = 2 Reds, $1 = 2.2 Greens. The goal is to determine the most cost-effective source for each product based solely on total landed cost, including product cost, exchange rates, ocean freight, and packaging efficiencies, to recommend the best sourcing country for each product.
Paper For Above instruction
The decision process for sourcing individual components from different countries involves a thorough analysis of cost factors, currency exchange impacts, packaging efficiencies, and logistics costs. Based on the given data, this paper examines the total landed cost for each of the five products sourced from Country A (Red-based costs) and Country B (Green-based costs). The goal is to ascertain the most economical source for each product, facilitating an optimal procurement strategy that minimizes total expenses and enhances supply chain efficiency.
Introduction
Global sourcing has become a vital component of supply chain management, particularly in an era marked by fluctuating currency exchange rates and volatile transportation costs. In this context, companies need to adopt a systematic approach that considers all facets of landed costs, including product prices, currency conversion impacts, logistics expenses, packaging efficiencies, and potential risks. The scenario presented involves two countries, A and B, each with distinct currencies, product costs, packaging efficiencies, and shipping costs, emphasizing the importance of comprehensive cost analysis in sourcing decisions.
Cost Analysis Methodology
The analysis begins by adjusting product costs for currency exchange rates to express them uniformly in U.S. dollars. For Country A (Red-based), the conversion rate is $1 = 2 Reds, and for Country B (Green-based), it is $1 = 2.2 Greens. Subsequently, the per-unit cost is calculated, then scaled to reflect total costs per container based on packaging efficiency. This includes considering the number of units per container—1,000 for Country A and 800 for Country B—and the ocean freight costs. The calculation also incorporates the per-piece ocean freight cost, derived from the total container cost divided by the number of units per container.
Calculations for Each Product
For each product, the total landed cost includes the product price in local currency, converted to USD, plus ocean freight per piece, accounting for packaging efficiency. This comprehensive evaluation allows for direct comparison, leading to data-driven sourcing decisions.
Product 1 Analysis and Recommendation
Product 1 costs are 10 Reds and 9 Greens. Converting to USD:
- Country A: 10 Reds / 2 Reds per USD = $5.00
- Country B: 9 Greens / 2.2 Greens per USD ≈ $4.09
Per-piece ocean freight costs:
- Country A: $5,000 / 1,000 units = $5.00 per piece
- Country B: $4,400 / 800 units = $5.50 per piece
Total landed costs:
- Country A: $5.00 + $5.00 = $10.00
- Country B: $4.09 + $5.50 ≈ $9.59
Since Country B’s total cost per unit is lower, sourcing Product 1 from Country B is more economical.
Product 2 Analysis and Recommendation
Product 2 costs: 2 Reds and 2.2 Greens.
- Country A: 2 Reds / 2 Reds per USD = $1.00
- Country B: 2.2 Greens / 2.2 Greens per USD = $1.00
Ocean freight:
- Country A: $5,000 / 1,000 units = $5.00 per piece
- Country B: $4,400 / 800 units = $5.50 per piece
Total costs:
- Country A: $1.00 + $5.00 = $6.00
- Country B: $1.00 + $5.50 = $6.50
Hence, sourcing Product 2 from Country A results in a lower total landed cost.
Product 3 Analysis and Recommendation
Costs: 7 Reds and 4 Greens.
- Country A: 7 Reds / 2 Reds per USD = $3.50
- Country B: 4 Greens / 2.2 Greens per USD ≈ $1.82
Ocean freight:
- Country A: $5,000 / 1,000 units = $5.00 per piece
- Country B: $4,400 / 800 units ≈ $5.50 per piece
Total:
- Country A: $3.50 + $5.00 = $8.50
- Country B: $1.82 + $5.50 ≈ $7.32
Therefore, Product 3 should be sourced from Country B to minimize costs.
Product 4 Analysis and Recommendation
Product 4 costs: 5 Reds and 5 Greens.
- Country A: 5 Reds / 2 Reds per USD = $2.50
- Country B: 5 Greens / 2.2 Greens per USD ≈ $2.27
Ocean freight:
- Country A: $5,000 / 1,000 units = $5.00 per piece
- Country B: $4,400 / 800 units = $5.50 per piece
Total:
- Country A: $2.50 + $5.00 = $7.50
- Country B: $2.27 + $5.50 ≈ $7.77
In this case, sourcing Product 4 from Country A is slightly more economical.
Product 5 Analysis and Recommendation
Costs: 4 Reds and 4.5 Greens.
- Country A: 4 Reds / 2 Reds per USD = $2.00
- Country B: 4.5 Greens / 2.2 Greens per USD ≈ $2.05
Ocean freight:
- Country A: $5,000 / 1,000 units = $5.00 per piece
- Country B: $4,400 / 800 units = $5.50 per piece
Total:
- Country A: $2.00 + $5.00 = $7.00
- Country B: $2.05 + $5.50 ≈ $7.55
Thus, Product 5’s total cost favors sourcing from Country A.
Overall Sourcing Recommendations
Based on comprehensive cost analyses, the most economical sources for each product are:
- Product 1: Country B
- Product 2: Country A
- Product 3: Country B
- Product 4: Country A
- Product 5: Country A
These decisions are driven primarily by product cost, currency conversion rates, and ocean freight considerations. Sourcing choices should also consider factors beyond costs, such as supplier reliability, quality standards, and political risks, but the cost analysis provides a solid foundation for decision-making.
Considerations for Assembly Location
Beyond sourcing individual components, determining the optimal location to assemble Products 1–5 involves evaluating multiple logistical, operational, and strategic factors. The possible assembly locations—Mexico, Canada, or the United States—each present unique considerations:
- Proximity to Markets: Assemblies closer to major markets reduce shipping times and costs, enhancing responsiveness to customer demand.
- Trade Agreements and Tariffs: Favorable trade agreements like NAFTA/USMCA can significantly lower tariffs and simplify customs procedures.
- Labor Costs and Skilled Workforce: Labor expenses and the availability of skilled labor influence overall assembly costs and product quality.
- Supply Chain Reliability and Risk: Disruptions, political stability, and infrastructure quality impact the consistency of supply.
- Regulatory and Environmental Standards: Compliance with local laws affects operational costs and sustainability commitments.
Given these considerations, the recommendation would likely favor assembly in Mexico due to its strategic location, trade agreements, and cost advantages, balancing proximity to the U.S. market with reasonable labor costs. However, specific manufacturing requirements, quality standards, and risk assessments must be weighed in final decision-making.
Conclusion
The comprehensive analysis of landed costs indicates tailored sourcing strategies for each product, emphasizing cost minimization while considering packaging efficiencies and logistics. Combining these insights with strategic considerations for assembly location ensures an optimized global supply chain that enhances competitiveness and operational resilience. The decision to source from Country B for Products 1 and 3, and from Country A for Products 2, 4, and 5, aligns with economic efficiency, which is crucial for maintaining profitability in a highly competitive global market.
References
- Christopher, M. (2016). Logistics & Supply Chain Management (5th ed.). Pearson.
- Coyle, J. J., Langley, C. J., Novack, R. A., & Gibson, B. (2017). Supply Chain Management: A Logistics Perspective (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.
- Frazelle, E. (2017). Supply Chain Strategy: The Logistics of Supply Chain Management. McGraw-Hill Education.
- Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2005). Managing to Collaborate: The Theory and Practice of Inter-Organizational Working. Routledge.
- Manuj, I., & Mentzer, J. T. (2008). Global supply chain risk management. Journal of Business Logistics, 29(1), 133-155.
- Monczka, R. M., Handfield, R. B., Giunipero, L. C., & Patterson, J. L. (2015). Purchasing and Supply Chain Management (6th ed.). Cengage Learning.
- Ruiz, S., & Bowen, F. (2017). Supply Chain Management: An Introduction to Logistics (2nd ed.). Wiley.
- Saxena, S., & Bhadauria, V. (2016). Strategic sourcing and procurement. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 5(4), 45-52.
- Singh, M., & Katiyar, R. (2018). Impact of currency fluctuation on supply chain cost management. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 21(3), 213–229.
- World Bank. (2021). Logistics Performance Index. Retrieved from https://lpi.worldbank.org/