Action Research Case Study Assignment In Week 3

The Action Research Case Study Assignment In Week 3 Had You Select A

The Action Research Case Study Assignment In Week 3 Had You Select A

The assignment requires a comprehensive final paper based on a previously selected case study from Week 3. The paper must incorporate feedback from prior assignments and address a change challenge within an organization. As a consultant, the goal is to outline an organizational development project to address this challenge effectively.

In the paper, introduce the purpose of the project, linking it to organizational development and change management issues. Use clear headers to organize content logically. The final paper should be approximately eight to ten pages, double-spaced, and integrate at least six scholarly or credible sources.

Section 1

Summarize the Week 3 Action Research Case Study, emphasizing the identified change challenge and its significance. Justify why this issue constitutes a problem, specifying its nature—such as turnover, diversity, ethics, job satisfaction, downsizing, restructuring, or a different type of organizational problem. Describe the action research process conceptualized from the Week 3 assignment, detailing the steps and rationale. Identify the intervention method selected in the Week 4 assignment and explain the intervention process, including how it aims to address the change challenge.

Section 2

Describe the role of the consultant during the intervention process, emphasizing leadership and facilitation skills. Categorize the necessary competencies—such as communication, conflict resolution, and cultural sensitivity—and ethical considerations like confidentiality and integrity. Define the research methods to be employed, such as surveys, interviews, or focus groups, and explain how data will be collected and analyzed throughout the intervention. Outline a timeline for implementing the intervention and evaluating its progress. Discuss potential resistance from stakeholders and outline strategies for managing and reconciling this resistance.

Section 3

Hypothesize the expected outcomes of the organization development (OD) intervention. Justify these projections with evidence and reasoning, considering organizational dynamics and the nature of the change. Discuss how success will be measured and outline criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of the intervention.

Conclusion

Conclude the paper with a comprehensive summary of the entire project—highlighting the purpose, process, anticipated outcomes, and lessons learned. Reaffirm the importance of structured OD strategies in resolving organizational challenges and fostering sustainable change.

References

  • Cummings, T. G., & Worley, C. G. (2014). Organizational Development and Change. Cengage Learning.
  • Kolb, D. A. (2015). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Pearson.
  • Cameron, E., & Green, M. (2015). Making Sense of Change Management. Kogan Page Publishers.
  • French, W. L., & Bell, C. H. (2016). Organization Development: Behavioral Science Interventions for Organization Improvement. Pearson.
  • Bulger, C. A. (2014). Strategically Managing Organizational Change. Springer.
  • Burnes, B. (2017). Managing Change. Pearson.
  • Burke, W. W. (2017). Organization Change: Theory and Practice. SAGE Publications.
  • Anderson, D. L. (2015). Beyond Change Management: How to achieve breakthrough results through conscious change. Pfeiffer.
  • French, W. L., & Bell, C. H. (2016). Organization Development: Behavioral Science Interventions for Organization Improvement. Pearson.
  • Whetten, D. A., & Cameron, K. S. (2016). Developing Management Skills. Pearson.