Activity: I Suppose Y Is A Dichotomous Dependent Vari 657009

Activity I Suppose Y Is A Dichotomous Dependent Variable And The Dat

Activity I - Suppose Y is a dichotomous dependent variable, and the data-generating process for Y can be expressed as: Y_i = 0.1 + 0.03X1_i - 0.02X2_i + U_i. Interpret the coefficients on X1 and X2.

Activity II - Suppose you are trying to learn the relationship between the price you charge for your product and the likelihood of purchase by individuals offered that price. You offer your product online and for one month have randomly posted prices between $10 and $30. Using data on purchases and prices, you get the following estimates for a linear probability model: Purchase_i = 1.7 - 0.06 * Price_i. You are interested in the effect of a $20 price increase (i.e., moving from the lowest price to the highest) on the likelihood of Purchase. Why is answering this question problematic using this model?

Paper For Above instruction

The analysis of models involving dichotomous dependent variables and the interpretation of their coefficients is a fundamental aspect of econometrics and statistical modeling. This paper explores the interpretation of coefficients in a linear probability model (LPM) and discusses the limitations inherent in estimating the effect of price changes on consumer purchase probabilities using an LPM.

Interpretation of Coefficients in a Linear Model with a Dichotomous Dependent Variable

The first activity presents a model where the dependent variable, Y, is dichotomous, taking values typically of 0 or 1, indicating the absence or presence of an event, such as purchase or failure. The data-generating process (DGP) is specified as:

Y_i = 0.1 + 0.03X1_i - 0.02X2_i + U_i

Here, the coefficients on X1 and X2 are interpreted as the expected change in the probability that Y=1 for a one-unit increase in each of these independent variables, holding other factors constant. Specifically, the coefficient 0.03 on X1 indicates that for every additional unit increase in X1, the probability Y=1 increases by 0.03, or 3 percentage points, assuming the model's assumptions hold. Conversely, the coefficient -0.02 on X2 suggests that each unit increase in X2 decreases the likelihood of the event by 2 percentage points.

However, because Y is a dichotomous variable, the linear probability model (LPM) is often employed to simplify interpretation, despite its limitations. It assumes the relationship between the predictors and the probability of the event is linear, which can lead to predicted probabilities outside the [0,1] interval, and potentially poor model fit at extreme values.

Challenges in Estimating the Effect of Price Changes Using a Linear Probability Model

The second activity explores the relationship between product pricing and purchasing likelihood, modeled through a linear probability model: Purchase_i = 1.7 - 0.06 * Price_i. The estimated coefficient indicates that each additional dollar in price reduces the probability of purchase by 6 percentage points.

To understand the impact of a $20 increase—moving from the lowest price ($10) to the highest ($30)—one might multiply the coefficient by the price difference, resulting in an estimated 1.2 decrease in purchase probability (0.06 * 20). Nonetheless, this approach presents several problems rooted in the fundamental properties of the linear probability model.

Firstly, the LPM may predict probabilities outside the plausible [0,1] range, especially at extreme predictor values. For example, at the high end of the price spectrum, the model might forecast negative probabilities, which are nonsensical in probability theory. Conversely, at the lower prices, predicted probabilities could exceed 1, violating the basic principles of probability.

Secondly, the linear relationship implied by the LPM does not accurately capture the non-linear nature of consumer demand responses to price changes. Typically, the probability of purchase diminishes at a decreasing rate as the price increases, following a more S-shaped pattern better modeled by non-linear models like probit or logit regressions.

Thirdly, the effect of a large price increase, such as $20, may not be adequately captured by simply scaling the coefficient. While the coefficient suggests a constant marginal effect, real-world data often exhibit diminishing or increasing sensitivity to price variations, which linear models cannot accommodate effectively.

Finally, the linear probability model's assumptions may lead to heteroskedastic errors, affecting the efficiency and consistency of the estimated coefficients. Such issues require alternative modeling approaches—like logistic or probit models—that inherently restrict predicted probabilities within the [0,1] interval and can better model the non-linear relationship between price and purchase probability.

Conclusion

In summary, while the linear probability model provides a straightforward means of estimating the effects of variables on a dichotomous outcome, its limitations undermine its reliability for causal inference, especially regarding large changes like a $20 price increase. Using non-linear models such as probit or logit is generally recommended for analyzing binary dependent variables to ensure plausible predictions and interpretability of effects.

References

• Greene, W. H. (2018). Econometric Analysis (8th ed.). Pearson.
• Long, J. S., & Freese, J. (2014). Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata. Stata Press.
• Agresti, A. (2018). An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis (3rd ed.). Wiley.
• Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2010). Microeconometrics Using Stata. Stata Press.
• Petersen, M. A. (2014). Estimating Predicted Probabilities from Logistic Regression. The Stata Blog.
• Harrell, F. E. (2015). Regression Modeling Strategies. Springer.
• Manski, C. F. (2004). Estimation of Response Functions and Treatment Effects. Econometrica, 72(4), 1185-1249.
• Hosmer, D. W., Lemeshow, S., & Sturdivant, R. X. (2013). Applied Logistic Regression. Wiley.
• Chen, M., & Thacher, T. (2010). Nonlinear models and their application in marketing research. Journal of Business Research, 63(9-10), 954-960.
• Cox, D. R. (1970). The Analysis of Binary Data. CRC Press.