Activity Objective: The Objective Of This Discussion 355820

Activity Objectivethe Objective Of This Discussion Is To Aid You In Ma

The objective of this discussion is to aid you in mastering the following course competencies: develop innovative and sustainable solutions to strategic and global operations management challenges; apply theories, models, and practices of global operations management to address business problems; develop approaches to operations management to respond appropriately to strategic business needs; formulate solutions to inventory management problems.

For this discussion, refer to Chapter 13 of your «Operations Management: Creating Value Along the Supply Chain» textbook, and review the case study «Scientific Glass, Inc.: Inventory Management (2011)» by Wheelwright and Schmidt.

Respond to the following questions: Identify the two basic decisions addressed by inventory management and discuss why the responses to these decisions differ for continuous and periodic inventory systems. What were the problems facing Scientific Glass, Inc. in January 2010? How much external funding would have to been raised in 2010 in order to finance operations? How do Scientific Glass, Inc.'s problems illustrate the relationship between the number of warehouses and inventory levels? What alternatives are available for dealing with the inventory problems? How would you evaluate the alternatives? What actions should Eva Beane have proposed to Eric Gregory and Melissa Hayes?

Paper For Above instruction

Inventory management is a vital component in operations management, focusing primarily on two fundamental decisions: determining the optimal order quantity and establishing the timing of inventory replenishments. These decisions are essential because they directly impact operational efficiency, costs, and service levels. The nature of these decisions varies significantly between continuous (or perpetual) inventory systems and periodic systems, mainly owing to their differing approaches to monitoring inventory levels and managing reordering processes.

In continuous inventory systems, inventory levels are constantly tracked in real-time, allowing businesses to make immediate decisions regarding order quantities and reorder points. This approach is suitable for firms requiring high service levels and where inventory costs justify technological investments. Conversely, periodic systems involve assessments of inventory levels at regular intervals, which means decisions about order quantities and timing are based on inventory counts during these intervals. These systems typically operate with less technological complexity but may be less responsive to sudden changes in demand or supply disruptions.

Applying these concepts to Scientific Glass, Inc., the company faced significant operational challenges in January 2010, primarily driven by inventory deficiencies, unpredictable demand patterns, and inadequate inventory control practices. One key problem was the inability to accurately forecast demand, leading to stockouts or excess inventory, which blemished customer satisfaction and increased costs. Additionally, limited warehouse capacity and inefficient ordering processes compounded these issues, indicating a misalignment between inventory policies and operational realities.

To evaluate the financial implications, the amount of external funding required in 2010 was substantial, as the company needed capital to cover operational costs, replenish inventories, and manage fluctuations in supply and demand. Precise calculation depended on detailed financial data; however, estimates suggest that significant external funding was necessary to bridge the cash flow gaps caused by poor inventory management, especially given the need to finance inventory buildup or safety stock improvements.

The problems faced by Scientific Glass exemplify the intrinsic relationship between the number of warehouses and inventory levels. An increase in the number of warehouses generally raises overall inventory levels due to safety stock requirements and duplicated inventories across locations. Conversely, consolidating warehouses can reduce total inventory but may increase lead times and transportation costs, affecting responsiveness. Balancing these factors requires careful analysis of supply chain design and inventory policies.

Several alternatives exist for addressing these inventory problems. These include adopting just-in-time (JIT) inventory practices to reduce excess stock, implementing advanced forecasting techniques to improve demand predictions, restructuring the supply chain to streamline distribution, and centralizing inventory storage to optimize inventory levels across locations. Inventory segmentation and safety stock optimization are also viable strategies to minimize both stockouts and excess inventory.

When evaluating these alternatives, criteria such as cost, lead time impact, service level improvement, complexity, and flexibility should be considered. For example, JIT reduces inventory holdings but demands reliable suppliers and responsive logistics systems. Centralized inventory management can achieve economies of scale but might compromise service levels if not carefully managed. The optimal solution often involves a hybrid approach tailored to the company's specific operational context.

In terms of actions, Eva Beane should have proposed to Eric Gregory and Melissa Hayes concrete strategies such as enhancing demand forecasting accuracy, investing in supply chain visibility tools, and reevaluating inventory policies to align with actual consumption patterns. Additionally, advocating for organizational changes to support real-time data collection and analysis would facilitate more informed decision-making. Ultimately, these actions aim to improve inventory turnover, reduce costs, and enhance customer satisfaction, thereby contributing to the company's strategic objectives.

References

• Heizer, J., Render, B., & Munson, C. (2017). Operations Management (12th ed.). Pearson.
• Chopra, S., & Meindl, P. (2019). Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planning, and Operation (7th ed.). Pearson.
• Wheelwright, S. C., & Schmidt, J. B. (2011). Scientific Glass, Inc.: Inventory Management. In Operations Management: Creating Value Along the Supply Chain.
• Krajewski, L. J., Malhotra, M. K., & Ritzman, L. P. (2018). Operations Management: Processes and Supply Chains (12th ed.). Pearson.
• Chung, W. (2014). Inventory management strategies in supply chains. International Journal of Production Economics, 147(1), 137-147.
• Simchi-Levi, D., Kaminsky, P., & Simchi-Levi, E. (2008). Designing and Managing the Supply Chain: Concepts, Strategies and Case Studies. McGraw-Hill.
• Gunasekaran, A., & Ngai, E. W. T. (2004). The successful implementation of ERP systems in manufacturing. International Journal of Production Research, 42(2), 365-385.
• Waters, D. (2003). Supply Chain Risk Management: Vulnerability and Resilience in Logistics. Kogan Page.
• Christopher, M. (2016). Logistics & Supply Chain Management (5th ed.). Pearson.
• Snyder, L. V., & Shen, Z.-J. (2019). Fundamentals of Supply Chain Theory. Wiley.