Actual Work Where Two Students Gave Their Post

Actual Work Where 2 Students Given Their Post On Thisdo You Believe T

Actual work where 2 students given their post on this: Do you believe that all data should be encrypted? Many computing professionals think this is a good idea. But a small number of computing experts feel that no data should be encrypted—that all data and software should be openly available to anyone who wants it. Explain your answer (whether you believe all data should or should not be encrypted). We need to give 2 responses all should have proper APA, citations, and minimum one reference each for both. Please find the two attachments of two students' posts. Note: Use first line hanging on the responses.

Paper For Above instruction

The debate over whether all data should be encrypted is a fundamental issue in information security and privacy. On one side, many professionals argue that encryption is essential for safeguarding sensitive information and maintaining privacy. Conversely, some believe that data should be openly accessible to foster transparency and open innovation. This response explores both perspectives, ultimately advocating for a balanced approach that considers the context and sensitivity of data.

Encryption plays a critical role in protecting personal privacy, corporate confidentiality, and national security. By encrypting data, organizations can prevent unauthorized access and reduce the risk of data breaches (Pfleeger & Schatten, 2014). For example, financial institutions encrypt transaction data to prevent fraud and identity theft. Furthermore, encryption ensures compliance with privacy regulations such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which mandates secure data management (Regulation (EU) 2016/679). The protection of sensitive data fosters consumer trust and market stability, making encryption indispensable in today’s digital landscape. From this standpoint, the blanket use of encryption is justified, especially for sensitive and private data.

On the other hand, some experts argue that over-reliance on encryption can hinder transparency and innovation. Open access advocates believe that data, especially in scientific research and government publications, should be freely available to promote collaboration and progress (Benkler, 2006). They argue that excessive encryption can be used to conceal malicious activities or authoritarian censorship. Moreover, in some instances, the complexity and resource demands of encryption can impede small organizations or individuals from sharing data effectively. For example, open-source projects often thrive on transparency, which can be compromised if data is encrypted and inaccessible to contributors (Shamir, 1979). Critics suggest that a nuanced approach is necessary—encrypting sensitive data while allowing open access to non-sensitive information.

Balancing these perspectives, a practical stance recognizes that not all data needs encryption. Critical and confidential data should be encrypted to protect privacy and security. However, data that is intended for public use or scientific dissemination may benefit from open access. Implementing layered security protocols and context-aware policies allows organizations to safeguard private data while promoting transparency where appropriate. Such an approach aligns with frameworks like the principle of least privilege and risk-based security models, which optimize both security and openness (ISO/IEC 27001, 2013). Ultimately, the decision to encrypt data should depend on its sensitivity, potential impact if compromised, and the societal value of open access.

References

• Benkler, Y. (2006). The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. Yale University Press.
• ISO/IEC 27001. (2013). Information technology — Security techniques — Information security management systems — Requirements.
• Pfleeger, C. P., & Schatten, M. (2014). Security in Computing (5th ed.). Prentice Hall.
• Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council. (2016). General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).
• Shamir, A. (1979). How to share a secret. Communications of the ACM, 22(11), 612-613.