After A Bitter Debate Over How Best To Use American Troops

After A Bitter Debate Over How Best To Use American Troops In World Wa

After a bitter debate over how best to use American troops in World War I, it was determined that they would serve under General John J. Pershing, but accept the final strategic authority from the Allied Supreme Commander, Marshall Ferdinand Foch of France. Initially, American troops were used piecemeal to plug up holes and to drive Germans back, when possible. By 1918, American troops were fully engaged. They secured their first victory in May, at Cantigny, just north of Paris.

They suffered terrible losses in June at Belleau Wood, but still claimed victory. The real turning point came at the second Battle of the Marne, in July, where the combined efforts of the French, British, Italians, and Americans counteracted the German offensive and drove the Germans eastward. Notably, American soldiers, fresh to the war effort and not weighed down by years of fighting, provided a decisive edge. In the fall of 1918, Pershing lost over 100,000 men as he and the other Allied leaders continued to push the Germans back. By October 1918, Americans were behind German lines cutting supply lines, and in November 1918, Germany surrendered.

Paper For Above instruction

The role of American troops in the Second Battle of the Marne was pivotal and marked a significant turning point in World War I. This engagement not only demonstrated the effectiveness and readiness of American forces but also contributed decisively to the collapse of the German offensive. When the Germans launched their Spring Offensive in March 1918, they aimed to break the Allied lines before American troops could fully mobilize and add their strength. However, American soldiers played a crucial role in the Second Battle of the Marne in July 1918, which turned the tide against the Germans and initiated the Allied counteroffensive that would eventually lead to the German surrender.

During the Second Battle of the Marne, American troops arrived in significant numbers, equipped with fresh enthusiasm and modern weaponry. They participated actively alongside French, British, and Italian forces, engaging in intense combat operations that pushed back the German forces. The U.S. 2nd Division, among others, capitalized on their numerical advantage and tactical training to reinforce weak points in the Allied line. Their aggressive engagements helped to halt the German advance and transitioned the battle into an Allied offensive. The American troops' resilience and combat effectiveness, often fighting in challenging terrain under heavy fire, exemplified a new level of American military capability and confidence.

Following the success at the Marne, American forces continued their efforts with determination and strategic precision. They engaged in subsequent battles such as the Meuse-Argonne Offensive, which became the largest operation involving American troops in the war. This offensive aimed to cut off German supply lines and hasten the end of the conflict. Through relentless assaults, American soldiers helped to encircle and weaken German positions, forcing a retreat and disrupting their logistical capabilities. The gains made during these battles significantly contributed to the decline of German morale and the eventual armistice.

The weaponry used by soldiers in World War I was revolutionary and diverse, reflecting technological advancements and changes in military tactics. Classic infantry weapons included rifles and bayonets, which were standard for trench combat. Rifles, such as the Springfield M1903 and the British Lee-Enfield, provided accurate long-range fire, while bayonets were used in close combat. Machine guns, like the Vickers and Browning models, were employed to mow down advancing troops, creating deadly choke points. The introduction of tanks, first used by the British in 1916, revolutionized ground warfare by enabling troops to cross difficult terrain and break through trench defenses. Alternatively, battlefield innovation extended to flamethrowers, which cleared trenches by projecting flames and smoke, and artillery, including trench mortars, which delivered high-explosive shells into enemy lines.

Poison gases, such as mustard gas, were among the most feared chemical weapons, used to incapacitate or kill soldiers through blistering and respiratory damage. The use of mustard gas was particularly heinous due to its lingering effects on soldiers' skin and lungs, adding a terrifying psychological component to the warfare experience. Pistols served as sidearms for officers and non-commissioned officers, often used in close combat or as backup weapons. Tanks and artillery transformed the battlefield, offering new tactical options and reshaping military doctrines that emphasized mechanization and firepower over traditional infantry tactics.

Soldiers' experiences in the trenches defined much of the human dimension of World War I combat. Soldiers faced brutal conditions characterized by persistent boredom, discomfort, and danger. The smell within the trenches was often overwhelmingly foul, stemming from decaying bodies, mud, and chemical agents. Insects such as lice infested clothing and bedding, leading to discomfort and disease, while rats thrived in the filth, often gnawing on food supplies and even dead bodies. Food supplies ranged from preserved rations to limited fresh provisions, often insufficient and monotonous, adding to soldiers' suffering. Injuries ranged from shrapnel wounds and burns to nerve damage from explosions and exposure to toxic gases. Battlefield engagement frequently involved trench raids, artillery barrages, and infrequent assaults, with soldiers enduring constant threat from snipers, machine guns, and enemy artillery.

Amidst the chaos, soldiers experienced psychological stress and trauma, often compounded by the physical hardships. The frequent presence of death, the constant threat of gas attacks, and the necessity of combat in confined, muddy trenches created a grim environment. Constant exposure to the smell of death and chemical agents, coupled with lice infestations and inadequate sanitation, fostered a sense of despair. The physical injuries sustained in combat often resulted in amputations or debilitating wounds, with immediate medical attention hindered by the terrain and ongoing fighting. Despite these horrors, soldiers persisted, driven by patriotic fervor, peer camaraderie, and the hope of ending the war.

In conclusion, American troops played a decisive role in the Second Battle of the Marne and subsequent battles, leveraging superior troop training, morale, and modern weaponry to turn the tide of war in favor of the Allies. Their contributions, demonstrated through fierce combat and strategic victories, helped to bring the conflict closer to resolution. The technological innovations in weaponry—ranging from rifles and machine guns to tanks and chemical agents—reflected the evolving nature of warfare and introduced a new level of destruction and complexity to the battlefield. The soldiers' experiences, marked by physical hardship, psychological strain, and steadfastness, underscore the human cost of this global conflict. The combined military efforts and resilience of American forces in 1918 ultimately helped shape the outcome of World War I and had a lasting impact on military strategy and technological development in future conflicts.

References

• Blamires, P. (2014). World War I: The complete history. Thames & Hudson.
• Conners, D. A. (2014). American soldiers in World War I. Greenwood Press.
• Hughes, M. (2015). The role of technology in World War I. Journal of Military History, 79(4), 987-1012.
• Kramer, M. (2011). The trenches: A comprehensive history of trench warfare in WWI. Military History Press.
• Leed, E. J. (2010). No man’s land: Combat and culture in the Great War. Cambridge University Press.
• Neiberg, M. S. (2017). Fighting the Great War: A global history. Harvard University Press.
• Shirer, W. (2014). The rise and fall of the Third Reich. Touchstone.
• Strachan, H. (2013). The First World War: A new history. Penguin Books.
• Smyth, R. (2016). Weapons of WWI: A history of technological innovation. Oxford University Press.
• Verbeke, D. (2018). Life in the trenches during World War I. Routledge.