After Discussion With Your Preceptor Name: Financial Aspects ✓ Solved

After Discussion With Your Preceptor Name One Financial Aspect One Q

After discussion with your preceptor, name one financial aspect, one quality aspect, and one clinical aspect that need to be taken into account for developing the evidence-based change proposal. Explain how your proposal will directly and indirectly impact each of the aspects. Now that you have completed a series of assignments that have led you into the active project planning and development stage for your project, briefly describe your proposed solution to address the problem, issue, suggestion, initiative, or educational need and how it has changed since you first envisioned it. What led to your current perspective and direction?

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Developing an evidence-based change proposal in healthcare requires careful consideration of multiple aspects that influence the success and sustainability of the intervention. These include financial, quality, and clinical considerations. Engaging with preceptors and reflecting on the progression of the project offers valuable insights into these dimensions and how ideas evolve over time. This paper discusses one financial aspect, one quality aspect, and one clinical aspect pertinent to the proposed change, along with an overview of the evolution of the proposed solution from inception to current perspective.

Financial Aspect

One significant financial aspect to consider in the development of the change proposal is the cost-effectiveness of the intervention. Implementing new practices often involves initial investments in training, equipment, or resources, which can be substantial. For example, introducing a new electronic health record (EHR) system incurs costs related to purchasing hardware, software, and staff training. While these costs are substantial upfront, the long-term financial benefits, such as improved billing accuracy and reduced administrative burdens, can offset initial expenses (Hrisos et al., 2016). The proposal aims to demonstrate that the intervention will ultimately save costs by reducing redundant tests and enhancing patient throughput. Directly, this aspect affects budgeting and resource allocation, while indirectly, it influences organizational financial stability and sustainability.

Quality Aspect

The quality aspect that warrants attention is patient safety and satisfaction. An evidence-based change, such as implementing standardized nursing protocols, might reduce adverse events and improve overall patient experiences. For instance, adherence to strict hand hygiene protocols reduces infection rates, directly impacting patient safety (Pittet et al., 2000). Indirectly, increased patient satisfaction can enhance hospital reputation and compliance with accreditation standards. Ensuring high quality outcomes aligns with healthcare organizations’ mission to provide safe, effective, and patient-centered care. Therefore, integrating quality measures into the change proposal is crucial for its acceptance and success.

Clinical Aspect

The clinical aspect involves the evidence supporting the intervention's efficacy. For example, if the proposed change is introducing a new protocol for managing diabetic foot ulcers, the clinical evidence should encompass current research indicating improved healing rates with specific dressings or treatments. This clinical evidence provides the foundation for practice change based on scientific studies (Nau et al., 2018). Indirectly, such clinical improvements can lead to reduced hospital stays and complications, which benefit patient outcomes broadly. Recognizing and integrating robust clinical evidence is essential for facilitating clinician buy-in and ensuring the intervention's validity.

Evolution of the Proposed Solution

Initially, the proposed solution centered around increasing staff training on infection control measures to reduce healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). However, through literature review and preceptor input, the focus shifted towards implementing a comprehensive protocol that combines staff education, environmental modifications, and regular compliance monitoring. This shift was driven by data indicating that multifaceted approaches are more effective than isolated interventions (Facchin et al., 2017). Additionally, feedback from frontline staff highlighted operational challenges that needed addressing, leading to a more integrated and practical solution. My perspective evolved from viewing training as sufficient to understanding the importance of systemic changes and ongoing evaluation to sustain improvements.

Conclusion

In conclusion, effective development of an evidence-based change proposal requires careful consideration of financial, quality, and clinical aspects. Addressing these areas comprehensively ensures a well-rounded approach that considers short-term costs, long-term benefits, patient safety, and scientific validity. The evolution of the proposed solution reflects an adaptive process based on evidence, stakeholder input, and practical challenges encountered during project planning. This iterative process enhances the likelihood of successful implementation and positive impact on patient care outcomes.

References

• Facchin, R., et al. (2017). The multifaceted approach to infection prevention: A review. International Journal of Infection Control, 13(3), 1-8.
• Hrisos, S., et al. (2016). Cost-effectiveness of health care interventions: Lessons learned. Health Economics Review, 6, 10.
• Nau, D. P., et al. (2018). Evidence-based management of diabetic foot ulcers. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 12(4), 755-764.
• Pittet, D., et al. (2000). Effectiveness of hand hygiene reduction of nosocomial infection. The Lancet, 356(9238), 1307-1312.