After Reading The Minicase Entitled Integrating Teams At Her

After Reading The Minicase Entitled Integrating Teams At Hernandez

After reading the minicase titled “Integrating Teams at Hernandez & Associates,” the focus is on understanding the challenges faced by the firm and applying the Team Leadership Model (TLM) to diagnose issues and identify leverage points for change. Marco, as a leader, inherits an existing team but must adapt it to the rapidly changing business environment, emphasizing the importance of diagnosing the current team dynamics and organizational processes (Hughes, Ginnett, & Curphy, 2015).

Using the TLM, which comprises input, process, and output, most of the challenges at Hernandez & Associates appear in the process phase. Specifically, the team struggles with communication, coordination, and evolving goals, which impairs their effectiveness. The firm’s outputs, such as client satisfaction, project completion, and innovation, are likely compromised due to ineffective team processes. Inputs like team composition, individual competencies, and organizational culture also influence these challenges, but the primary difficulty lies in how the team works together—indicating a need to focus on improving team processes (Hughes et al., 2015).

The team’s goals for outputs should include enhanced client service, greater efficiency in project delivery, and increased innovation, aligning with strategic organizational objectives. To achieve this, Marco can leverage resources such as external consulting for team development, training programs focused on collaboration and communication skills, and leadership coaching to guide team integration efforts.

Internally, existing organizational support structures such as HR and senior management can be pivotal resources in facilitating change. Moreover, embracing technology to improve communication, employing team-building initiatives, and fostering a culture of openness and adaptability are essential strategies to transform team functioning (Hughes et al., 2015). By recognizing the critical leverage points within the TLM—particularly in refining team processes—and utilizing these resources, Marco can steer Hernandez & Associates toward a more cohesive and effective team capable of meeting the evolving business demands.

Paper For Above instruction

The minicase “Integrating Teams at Hernandez & Associates” presents a scenario where Marco, a leader within the firm, must confront entrenched team dynamics and organizational challenges without the luxury of forming a new team from scratch. This situation necessitates a thorough diagnostic approach grounded in the Team Leadership Model (TLM) to understand the complexities and identify effective leverage points for change. The TLM dissects team dynamics into three core components—input, process, and output—each offering insight into where issues might stem from and where intervention might be most effective (Hughes, Ginnett, & Curphy, 2015).

In this context, most of Hernandez & Associates’ challenges are rooted in the process component of the TLM. Processes refer to how team members interact, communicate, resolve conflicts, and coordinate their activities. Ineffective or dysfunctional processes, such as poor communication, misaligned goals, and unresolved conflicts, tend to hinder the team’s overall performance. For example, if team members are not collaboratively sharing information or are resistant to change, these issues impede the team’s ability to deliver high-quality client solutions efficiently. Consequently, outputs such as client satisfaction, project delivery times, and innovation suffer. While input factors like team composition, individual skills, and organizational culture are fundamental, they are often less malleable in the short term than process improvements, making process-focused interventions vital.

The team’s primary goals for outputs should focus on improving client satisfaction, ensuring timely project completion, fostering innovation, and enhancing overall organizational effectiveness. These objectives align with strategic priorities such as competitiveness, growth, and adaptability. To achieve these, Marco must leverage various internal and external resources. External resources may include professional development programs, team-building workshops, or consulting services specializing in organizational change and team efficacy. Internally, the firm’s existing HR department, senior leadership, and available technological infrastructure can support efforts to enhance communication, establish clearer roles, and promote a culture of continuous improvement (Hughes et al., 2015).

Furthermore, leveraging leadership coaching and fostering an environment that encourages open dialogue and shared goals are critical strategies. These initiatives can promote greater trust and cohesion within the team, directly influencing process improvements. Technology tools such as project management and communication platforms can facilitate better coordination and information sharing. Overall, by diagnosing where the core issues lie—primarily within team processes—and mobilizing resources accordingly, Marco can lead Hernandez & Associates through a transformative change that aligns team functionality with the evolving demands of their business environment.

References

• Hughes, R. L., Ginnett, R. C., & Curphy, G. J. (2015). Leadership: Enhancing the lessons of experience (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Wheelan, S. A. (2014). Creating effective teams: A guide for members and leaders. SAGE Publications.
• Burke, W. W. (2017). Organization change: Theory and practice. SAGE Publications.
• Hackman, J. R. (2002). Leading teams: Setting the stage for great performances. Harvard Business Review Press.
• Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63(6), 384–399.
• Reeves, M., & Deimler, M. (2011). Adaptability: The new competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review, 89(7/8), 134-141.
• Salas, E., Cooke, N. J., & Rosen, M. A. (2008). Toward a science of team performance: Building causal and explanatory models. Human Factors, 50(3), 540-547.
• Gersick, C. J. (1988). Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31(1), 9–41.
• Edmondson, A. C. (2012). Teaming: How organizations learn, innovate, and compete in the knowledge economy. Jossey-Bass.
• Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and practice (8th ed.). SAGE Publications.