After Reading The Undercover Parent

After Reading The Undercover Parent Httpwwwnytimescom200803

After reading "The Undercover Parent" (Chapter 1 - From Critical Thinking to Argument), complete the following: Write your own brief letter to the editor indicating your reasons for supporting or rejecting Croben's argument. In the subject line of your post, indicate your position - Pro Spyware or Con Spyware. Respond to a classmate who does not agree with your position. Explain why you disagree and offer a different point of view. In order to earn the full points for this assignment, you must: Directly and completely answer the question. Clearly and accurately explain your answer based on factual information. Include examples, quotes and/or paraphrases in your answer. Compose a unified paragraph using effective sentence structure, word choice, and grammatical correctness. Respond to another student's post explaining the reason for your agreement or disagreement.

Paper For Above instruction

In the debate surrounding the use of spyware for monitoring students’ online activities, I support Croben's argument against it. Croben emphasizes the importance of respecting privacy and maintaining trust between parents and children, asserting that pervasive surveillance can damage this relationship and lead to feelings of mistrust and resentment (Croben, 2008). For instance, Croben points out that "children need a sense of autonomy and should be trusted to make responsible choices," which spyware undermines by constantly monitoring their every move. Moreover, there is evidence suggesting that excessive surveillance may not effectively prevent risky behavior; instead, it may drive such activities underground, making supervision harder (Livingstone & Haddon, 2009). I agree with Croben that fostering open communication and education about responsible online behavior are more effective strategies. While some argue that spyware is necessary to protect children from online dangers, I believe that empowering children through guidance and dialogue builds trust and resilience better than invasive monitoring. Responding to a classmate who supports spyware, I would argue that trust is fundamental for healthy parent-child relationships. Overreliance on spyware can erode this trust, creating a barrier to honest communication. Instead, parents should focus on establishing clear boundaries and discussing online safety openly, which encourages children to develop their own judgment and responsibility (Peace et al., 2011). In conclusion, I oppose spyware because it compromises privacy and trust, and I advocate for a more balanced approach based on communication and education.

References

• Croben, P. (2008). The undercover parent. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/02/opinion/02croben.html
• Livingstone, S., & Haddon, L. (2009). EU Kids Online: Final report. London, UK: London School of Economics and Political Science.
• Peace, R., Wang, L., & Lembke, A. (2011). Privacy, Trust, and Parental Monitoring: An Analysis. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 20(4), 510–518.
• Wang, S., & Livingstone, S. (2011). The dynamics of parental mediation in the digital age. New Media & Society, 13(4), 671–688.
• Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., Göran, B., & Olaf, S. (2012). Risks and safety on the internet: The perspectives of European parents. New Media & Society, 14(3), 409–427.