After Reviewing The Invisible Patients Documentary Described
After Reviewingthe Invisible Patientsdocumentarydefinedescribe In De
After reviewing The Invisible Patients documentary, define and describe in detail an ethical dilemma experienced by the nurse practitioner (NP). There are multiple ethical issues presented in the documentary, so responses should reflect diverse perspectives. Explain how you would have handled the situation. Additionally, discuss how the NP in the documentary functions as a Disruptive Innovator. Consider whether there is a relationship between your personal beliefs and values and this ethical dilemma or barrier. Finally, describe at least one mechanism to overcome the discussed barrier, examining both potential costs and benefits. The question emphasizes that there is no single correct answer for this ethical issue.
Paper For Above instruction
The documentary The Invisible Patients sheds light on several complex ethical issues encountered by healthcare practitioners, specifically nurse practitioners (NPs), in their daily practice. Among these, a prominent ethical dilemma concerns balancing patient autonomy with the need for medical intervention, especially in situations involving vulnerable populations. In one illustrative case from the film, an NP faces a dilemma when managing a patient with a chronic condition who refuses treatment due to personal beliefs rooted in cultural or religious values. This scenario encapsulates a broader ethical challenge: respecting the patient's right to refuse care versus the healthcare provider's obligation to do no harm and ensure optimal health outcomes.
In this particular situation, the NP is confronted with an ethical tension between respecting the patient's autonomy and ensuring beneficent care. The patient, heavily influenced by cultural beliefs, refuses recommended medications and lifestyle modifications. The NP must decide whether to honor the patient's wishes or to persuade or even pressure the patient toward accepting treatment to prevent deterioration of health. Ethically, the principle of autonomy supports honoring the patient's choices, even if they conflict with medical advice. However, the principle of beneficence urges the clinician to act in the patient's best interest, which might involve persuading the patient or pursuing alternative solutions that align with their values.
If I were in this situation, I would prioritize shared decision-making, aiming to build trust and understanding with the patient. I would ensure that the patient is fully informed about the risks and benefits of accepting or refusing treatment, respecting their cultural context while emphasizing the importance of health. I would explore culturally sensitive alternatives that align with the patient's values, seeking compromise where possible. If the patient still refuses treatment after thorough counseling, I would respect their autonomy while documenting the process meticulously, continuously offering support. My approach embodies respect for the patient's dignity and self-determination while striving to promote health within their cultural framework.
The NP depicted as a Disruptive Innovator in the documentary demonstrates how challenging traditional workflows and advocating for underserved populations can lead to transformational change in healthcare delivery. This NP disrupts conventional practices by advocating for policy reforms, embracing telemedicine, and providing care to marginalized communities previously overlooked or neglected by mainstream healthcare systems. Such disruptive actions challenge established norms, encouraging systemic improvements and highlighting gaps in care. The practitioner's innovative approach exemplifies disrupting status quos to increase access, improve outcomes, and foster equity, which aligns with disruptive innovation principles described by Christensen (1997).
My personal beliefs and values significantly influence how I perceive this ethical dilemma. I value cultural competence, autonomy, and equity in healthcare. These principles guide me to respect diverse beliefs and advocate for patient-centered care that honors individual values. Recognizing the importance of cultural sensitivity, I believe that ethical practice involves listening carefully, engaging in open dialogue, and finding common ground with patients. My commitment to equity would motivate me to explore options that respect cultural differences while ensuring health and safety. Conversely, potential conflicts may arise if cultural beliefs severely compromise health, challenging my dedication to beneficence.
One mechanism to overcome such barriers is increasing cultural competence training among healthcare providers. Enhancing understanding of diverse cultural backgrounds fosters trust and communication, reducing conflicts related to treatment refusal. Incorporating community health workers and interpreters can bridge cultural gaps, ensuring patients feel respected and understood. The costs of implementing cultural competence initiatives include financial investments in training programs and potential time constraints. However, the benefits—improved patient satisfaction, better adherence to treatment, reduced disparities, and enhanced health outcomes—outweigh these costs. Ultimately, fostering cultural competence empowers clinicians to navigate ethical dilemmas more effectively, promoting equitable and respectful care.
In conclusion, the ethical dilemmas faced by NPs in The Invisible Patients highlight the importance of balancing respect for patient autonomy with clinical beneficence. Disruptive innovators in healthcare challenge traditional paradigms to address unmet needs and improve access. Personal values influence how ethical issues are perceived and managed; thus, strategies like cultural competence are essential to overcoming barriers. These approaches not only enhance individual patient outcomes but also contribute to a more just and effective healthcare system.
References
Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator's dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Harvard Business Review Press.
US Department of Health & Human Services. (2005). The Nuremberg Code. Retrieved from https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/index.html
Washington, H. A. (2012). Medical Apartheid: The dark history of medical experimentation on Black Americans from colonial times to the present. JHU Press.
Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2013). Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford University Press.
Sandel, M. J. (2009). Justice: What's the right thing to do? Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Mitchell, G., & Short, W. (2018). Health disparities and social determinants of health. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 74(3), 435-446.
Gwartney, S. D., & Strickland, S. (2007). Ethical dilemmas in nursing. Journal of Nursing Education, 46(5), 229-235.
Moreno, B., & Frick, T. (2015). Cultural competence in healthcare: A review and practical guide. Journal of Healthcare Management, 60(6), 392-398.
Harper, D. C., & Armitage, J. (2014). Disruptive innovation in healthcare: Opportunities and challenges. Healthcare Innovation, 21(6), 167-175.
Walker, R., & Rogers, M. (2019). Ethical principles in nursing practice. American Journal of Nursing, 119(4), 42-49.