Agency Problem And Control Of The Corporation

Agency Problem And Control Of The Corporationamerican Merchant Corpora

Agency problems and control issues are central concerns in corporate governance, particularly in companies like American Merchant Corporation (AMC), which face conflicts of interest between management and shareholders. These issues are rooted in the separation of ownership and control, where managers may prioritize personal gains over shareholder value, potentially leading to decisions that diminish the company's market value. This paper explores the nature of agency problems in AMC, the role of corporate governance mechanisms, and compares agency issues across different business structures.

Assignment Instructions

Answer the following concept questions: Who are the owners of corporations? Does the goal of maximizing the value of corporations differ for financial management in a foreign country? Why or why not? Explain agency theory and describe three agency problems in AMC. Do you think agency problems are likely to be more or less severe in partnerships and sole proprietorships than in corporations? Why or why not? The current stock price of AMC is $25 per share. Another company wants to buy AMC and will pay $35 per share to acquire all the outstanding stock. AMC management immediately begins to fight off this hostile bid. Is management acting in the best interest of shareholders? Why or why not? Identify four corporate governance mechanisms that can be used to reduce the agency problems in corporations.

Paper For Above instruction

Corporate ownership structures significantly influence how companies are governed and how they align management interests with those of shareholders. In a corporation like AMC, the primary owners are the shareholders. Shareholders are the residual owners of the firm, holding equity stakes that entitle them to a portion of the company’s profits and voting rights on key issues. Unlike management or the board of directors, shareholders generally have limited involvement in daily operations but possess the ultimate control through their voting power. This separation of ownership and control creates potential conflicts, known as agency problems, which are central to corporate governance theory.

Agency theory provides a framework to understand conflicts that arise due to divergent interests between principals (shareholders) and agents (managers). It suggests that managers, motivated by personal incentives such as salary, bonuses, or career advancement, may pursue actions that maximize their own benefits rather than enhancing shareholder wealth. In AMC’s case, these issues have manifested in misleading financial statements, unprofitable mergers, excessive executive perks, and manipulative tactics to boost managerial power at the expense of shareholders’ interests.

Three notable agency problems in AMC include: first, the misreporting of financial data to inflate profitability; second, the management’s acquisition of luxurious assets like corporate jets and substantial increases in executive compensation despite declining stock prices; and third, management’s resistance to an unsolicited bid of $35 per share, which is significantly higher than the current market price of $25. Their actions suggest efforts to entrench managerial control rather than maximize shareholder value. Such behaviors exemplify agency costs, which include monitoring expenses, bonding costs, and residual loss caused when managerial objectives diverge from those of shareholders.

Agency problems tend to be less severe in partnerships and sole proprietorships because the owner and manager are often the same individual or closely aligned, reducing the principal-agent dilemma. In corporations, the separation of ownership from management introduces agency costs and potential conflicts, which require mechanisms like monitoring, incentive alignment, and regulation to mitigate. Conversely, in sole proprietorships and partnerships, the owner’s direct involvement in decision-making naturally aligns interests, although these entities may face other challenges such as limited access to capital or succession issues.

The hostile takeover bid for AMC highlights the importance of corporate governance in protecting shareholder interests. When another company offers to buy AMC at $35 per share, management’s resistance could stem from self-interest—such as maintaining their control, or higher executive compensation, rather than acting in the best interest of shareholders. According to the principle of shareholder primacy, management should consider accepting such a lucrative offer if it maximizes shareholder wealth, especially since the bid exceeds the current stock price and reflects the company's intrinsic value more accurately.

To mitigate agency problems, corporations can employ several governance mechanisms. Four effective methods include:

• Implementing an effective board of directors with independent members to oversee management decisions.
• Aligning managerial incentives with shareholder interests via performance-based compensation plans.
• Enhancing transparency and disclosure requirements to reduce information asymmetry between management and shareholders.
• Establishing external audit procedures and regulatory oversight to ensure financial integrity and prevent misreporting.

In conclusion, agency problems pose significant risks to corporate efficiency and market confidence. The case of AMC underscores the need for robust governance mechanisms and vigilant oversight to align management actions with shareholder interests, thereby safeguarding shareholder value and promoting market stability. Addressing agency conflicts is essential not only within large corporations but across all business forms, with tailored mechanisms suitable for each type of ownership and control structure.

References

• Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
• Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301-325.
• Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737-783.
• American Economic Review, 76(2), 323-329."
• Journal of Finance, 55(2), 783-827."
• Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(12), 3206-3221."
• Corporate Governance: An International Review, 23(3), 182-187."