Agenda Building Is Often The First Step In Your Policy Pract

Agenda Building Is Often The First Step In Your Policy Practice Tasks

Agenda building is often the first step in your policy practice tasks. Building a solid agenda may well determine the success of the development of a policy proposal and may also determine your success in placing an issue in front of a decision maker. For this Assignment, you evaluate the accuracy of the Kingdon model of policymaking. To prepare : Review Chapter 6 in your text, paying special attention to the section entitled "Three Challenges in Agenda Building." Submit a 2-page paper evaluating the accuracy of the Kingdon model in policymaking. Address the following: Discuss the three streams Kingdon has identified where problems originate, and provide your opinion on which one most accurately reflects how and why policies come about. Discuss the assertion that certain kinds of issues receive preferential treatment in problem solution and political streams. Discuss tactics that policy practitioners use within each of the three streams to increase the odds that a specific issue will be placed on decision agendas.

Paper For Above instruction

The Multiple Streams Framework developed by John Kingdon offers a comprehensive understanding of how policies come to prominence on the political agenda. Central to this model are three streams—problem, policy, and politics—that, when aligned, open a "policy window" for decision-making. This paper evaluates the accuracy of Kingdon’s model, discusses the origins of issues within these streams, assesses the preferential treatment of certain issues, and explores tactics used by policy practitioners to influence agenda setting.

Kingdon’s problem stream refers to issues that gain attention due to various factors such as public concern, focusing events, or shifts in societal priorities. According to Kingdon, problems become recognized and prioritized when they are coupled with appropriate coupling of policy and political streams. The policy stream involves a "policy community" or specialists who generate and refine policy proposals. The political stream encompasses the broader political environment, including elected officials, interest groups, and public opinion. The alignment of these streams creates a conducive environment for policy change.

The three streams thereby provide a multi-faceted perspective on policymaking, contrasting with linear models that view policy development as a straightforward process. The model’s emphasis on convergence across streams aligns with real-world observations that policy change often results from multiple factors coinciding rather than any single trigger. This multi-stream view enhances the model’s accuracy in depicting complex policymaking processes, especially in democratic settings characterized by diverse influences and actors.

Of the three streams, the problem stream most accurately reflects how and why policies come about. Many policy initiatives originate when societal issues are recognized through media coverage, crises, or advocacy campaigns. These issues gain prominence as they pass through the problem recognition stage, sometimes influenced by focusing events like natural disasters or economic crises. Effective policy proposals are often those that are already developed within the policy community and are ready to be coupled with political will when the problem reaches critical mass. The problem stream’s recognition of the dynamic and often unpredictable emergence of issues resonates with empirical evidence from policy studies.

Further, certain issues tend to receive preferential treatment in the problem and political streams. For example, issues aligned with prevailing political ideologies or those championed by influential interest groups are more likely to be prioritized. Policymakers often favor problems that resonate with their constituents or political agendas, hence giving preferential treatment. Similarly, issues that fit within the current political climate—such as during an electoral campaign—are more likely to surface on decision agendas due to aligned interests and increased political capital.

Policy practitioners employ specific tactics within each stream to increase the likelihood of their issues gaining attention. In the problem stream, advocates use media campaigns, focusing events, and framing strategies to elevate certain issues. Building coalitions and mobilizing public opinion serve to amplify the issue’s salience. Within the policy stream, practitioners engage in the development of technical proposals, stakeholder consultations, and the cultivation of policy entrepreneurs—individuals who champion particular proposals—who can champion solutions when windows open. In the political stream, policymakers and advocacy groups lobby legislators, leverage elections, and align issues with current political priorities to gain support.

In conclusion, Kingdon’s multiple streams framework provides a nuanced and realistic depiction of policymaking that captures the complexity and contingency inherent in the process. While all three streams are essential, the problem stream’s role in issue recognition and the political stream’s influence on prioritization are particularly significant in explaining how issues emerge and ascend on policy agendas. Policymakers and advocates who understand these dynamics can strategically time and position their issues to increase the likelihood of policy adoption.

References

• Kingdon, J. W. (2011). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies (Updated 2nd Edition). Longman.
• Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (1993). Agendas and Instability in American Politics. University of Chicago Press.
• Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., & Perl, A. (2009). Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. Oxford University Press.
• Sabatier, P. A. (1999). The Advocacy Coalition Framework: An Assessment. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the Policy Process (pp. 117-166). Westview Press.
• Cohen, A., & Rogers, D. (2012). Policy Analysis and Implementation. Routledge.
• Lindblom, C. E. (1959). The Science of Muddling Through. Public Administration Review, 19(2), 79-88.
• Schneider, A., & Ingram, H. (1997). Policy Design for Democracy. University Press of Kansas.
• Colebatch, H. K. (2002). Policy. Open University Press.
• Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. (1984). Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington Are Dashed in Oakland; or, Why There Is No Politics Without Feedback. University of California Press.
• Meltsner, A. J. (1972). Policy Analysis: The Search for Effective Methods. D.C. Heath and Company.