Ali 150c Stammler Exploring Definitions For Each Assignment

Ali 150c Stammlerexploring Definitionessaysforeachassigned Reading

Ali 150c Stammlerexploring Definition essays for each assigned reading do the following for your analytical response: Note: Your analysis must be TYPED and is Due the Date the reading is due. (no late work accepted) A. Read and Annotate the Text B. Analyze: In your response, include the following information for EACH TITLED TEXT: Title and Author 1. Thesis: What is the PRIMARY DEFINITION? A. If it is a Direct Thesis, copy it down. (include para) B. If you could not locate a “Direct Thesis” and thus it is an “Indirect” or implied Thesis; write down what you believe is the thesis of the paper. C. Answer: Do you agree or disagree with the author’s assertion or definition of the term? 2. Supporting Arguments: A. What are the main arguments or supporting “definitions”? (there may be several: provide minimum 4) B. Are these arguments or definitions persuasive? Why or why not? 3. Definition: How do you define the term (word or concept) of the essay in your own words? Write your own defining statement [example: To me, “word” means……] 4. Vocabulary: Choose 3 new words from the text to learn. Provide the following: A. Paragraph/line it is found in B. The definition/ synonym C. Word family (noun/ adj/ adverb/ verb)- as available D. An example: use the word in a QUALITY sentence that demonstrates the meaning and your understanding of the word. 5. Critical Thinking: Why is this term important? Consider all aspects: to the text, to you, to various audiences, culturally, socially, globally (write a complete paragraph) Scoring: 25 points each / Reading Schedule: See course outline Joe Smart 07OCT2015 Definition Writing – Final Draft Follow Me “Follow me” should be considered a catch phrase for a certain type of person. This type of person isn’t born, they’re forged from their experiences throughout life. They are the people that stand up when everyone else remains seated. They are a voice, not just for themselves, but for many others as well. This person is a leader. John Maxwell famously said, “Leaders become great not because of their power, but because of their ability to empower others”. There are many different types of leaders, but the best leaders have a few significant characteristics; a leader is someone that is charismatic, modest, and versatile. A leader is charismatic; they need to inspire and they need to be well-liked. There are many leaders throughout history that succeeded simply from their charismatic attitudes. Napoleon Bonaparte is a great example of this type of leader. Napoleon was never imposing physically or intellectually; instead, it was his mere presence that so many people found imposing. Arthur Wellesley, an enemy of Napoleon, is known for saying that, “his presence on the battlefield was worth 40,000 men”, due to the inspiration and confidence that his troops received when he was around. He was so well-liked by the people of France that when he escaped exile on Elba island, he marched to Paris and reclaimed his status of Emperor without using any force. Napoleon’s charismatic personality played a central role in his ability as a leader and is why he was such a predominant figure in Europe. Leaders are modest, both in their life and their work; they’re humble and respectful to everyone regardless of who they are. Pope Francis is a prime example of a modest leader who, “practices what he preaches”. As the leader of the Catholic religion, Pope Francis felt as though clergy was getting carried away with extensive luxuries, rather than living humbly and giving that extra money to the poor. To lead by example, he moved out of the lavish apartment that is set aside for the Pope and refuses to wear the expensive, flashy robes. He insisted that when priests and nuns need a car, they buy something used and modest. Pope Francis led by example by driving in old used Fiats and Fords, even though he could certainly drive around in the newest Mercedes if he wanted to. Pope Francis isn’t only humble; he has continuously shown that he respects everyone regardless of their religion, race or social status. In his recent trip to the United States, the Pope decided not to eat lunch with Congress. Instead, he ate lunch with the homeless because they don’t have a strong voice and are treated so poorly by society; he wanted to give them the respect they deserve as humans. Pope Francis has become an extremely popular Pope and is even called, “The People’s Pope”, because of his modesty and respect for all humans. Finally, a leader needs to be quick-witted and able to think past the immediate future. Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy (MCPON) Mike Stevens is a great example of this type of leader. When he took office, the Navy was going through social changes; deployments were being canceled at the last minute for some ships, and extended for others. It was a time of confusion and frustration for many Sailors, who felt disconnected from the leadership of the Navy. MCPON Stevens quickly took to social media to learn the problems that the fleet was facing from the Sailors themselves, as opposed to focusing on anonymous surveys and charts like his predecessors. This turned out to be a huge change; the average Sailor felt like they had a voice and they weren’t just a percentage or number anymore. During MCPON Stevens's first year in office, he realized that the Navy’s training and initiation processes went against policy on hazing. He quickly created and revealed a new training process that would be much more effective than the age-old initiations. His new process would actually train Sailors rather than just humiliate them. This immediately led to a much safer process that gave the Navy smarter, better-trained Sailors. MCPON Stevens made radical changes for the Navy; his versatile leadership style helped give everyone a voice and made the Navy much stronger. There are many good and bad leaders in the world. Every now and then, a different type of leader comes along; this leader may be changing the world, or may be changing the lives of just a few people around them. This type of leader has the significant qualities that set them apart from the rest and elevate them above everyone else; they are the charismatic, modest, and versatile leaders. They are the leaders that will have a profound impact on those around them, and they are the ones that are not forgotten.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

The concept of leadership has been a pivotal subject in social, political, and organizational contexts for centuries. Defining what makes a leader effective or admirable involves understanding various qualities and traits that individuals embody. The assignment at hand requires analyzing a provided text that explores the characteristics of charismatic, modest, and versatile leaders. The goal is to identify the primary definition of leadership according to the author, evaluate the supporting arguments, articulate one’s own definition, learn new vocabulary, and critically assess the importance of leadership in societal and personal contexts.

The analyzed text emphasizes that effective leaders are distinguished by their ability to inspire, humility, and quick-wittedness. Through historical and contemporary examples—such as Napoleon Bonaparte, Pope Francis, and MCPON Mike Stevens—the author illustrates how charisma, humility, and versatility facilitate impactful leadership. These qualities are presented not as innate traits but as qualities that forge individuals into extraordinary leaders capable of influencing their followers profoundly. This analysis will evaluate the author's primary definition of leadership, assess the supporting arguments, reflect upon my own understanding of leadership, expand my vocabulary with new words, and analyze why leadership remains a significant concept globally and personally.

Thesis and Definition

The primary definition of leadership in the provided text centers on the qualities of charisma, humility, and versatility—traits that together enable individuals to inspire, respect, and adapt in diverse situations. While the text describes leadership as a multifaceted phenomenon, the core assertion is that effective leaders possess a delicate balance of personal charm, modesty, and adaptability that allows them to influence others positively. These attributes make leaders memorable and impactful, whether they are historical figures or contemporary figures like Pope Francis and MCPON Mike Stevens.

I agree with the author’s emphasis on these traits. Charisma, humility, and versatility indeed play significant roles in leadership effectiveness. Charisma fosters inspiration and admiration, humility builds trust and respect, and versatility ensures adaptability to changing circumstances. These qualities, when combined, create leaders who are not only admired but also genuinely respected and capable of sustaining influence across various contexts.

Supporting Arguments

The author provides several supporting arguments to reinforce the primary definition of leadership. First, Napoleon Bonaparte exemplifies charisma—his commanding presence alone motivated his troops, illustrating how personal charm can uplift followers and generate loyalty. Second, Pope Francis exemplifies humility—living modestly and prioritizing service over personal luxury, which endears him to followers and demonstrates authentic leadership behavior. Third, MCPON Mike Stevens exemplifies versatility—adapting to social changes and addressing the needs of sailors through innovative communication and training programs. Fourth, the author underscores that charismatic, humble, and versatile leaders have a profound and lasting impact, surpassing those who rely solely on power or authority.

These arguments are persuasive because they are supported by concrete examples and historical context. The anecdotes about Napoleon and Pope Francis exemplify how these qualities translate into effective leadership. The mentioned events, such as Pope Francis dining with the homeless or MCPON Stevens utilizing social media, convincingly illustrate how the combination of traits fosters trust, inspires action, and facilitates positive change—qualities that are universally applicable in leadership contexts.

Personal Definition

To me, leadership means the ability to inspire and guide others by exemplifying qualities such as charisma, humility, and adaptability. A leader is someone who can motivate individuals to achieve common goals while maintaining respect and integrity. Leadership involves influencing others not through coercion but by earning trust and admiration through authentic actions and effective communication. It also requires flexibility to respond to new challenges and diverse perspectives, ensuring sustained impact in various environments.

Vocabulary

Below are three words I selected from the text, along with their definitions, family forms, and example sentences:

1. Charismatic

   Found in paragraph 1, line 7

   Definition: Charming, inspiring, and able to influence others through personal appeal.

   Word family: charisma (noun), charismatically (adverb)

   Example: The new leader’s charismatic personality swiftly gained the trust and admiration of her team.

2. Modest

   Found in paragraph 2, line 1

   Definition: Humble and unassuming; not proud or boastful.

   Word family: modesty (noun), modestly (adverb)

   Example: Despite his fame, he remained modest about his achievements, always giving credit to his team.

3. Versatile

   Found in paragraph 3, line 8

   Definition: Capable of adapting or being adapted to many different functions or activities.

   Word family: versatility (noun), versatile (adjective)

   Example: Her versatile skills allowed her to excel in multiple role areas within the organization.

Critical Thinking

The importance of leadership extends beyond individual influence; it shapes societal progress, fosters social cohesion, and drives organizational success. In a globalized world marked by diversity and rapid change, the qualities of charismatic, humble, and versatile leaders become crucial for addressing complex challenges such as social inequality, climate change, and political instability. Leaders who inspire trust and adapt to new circumstances can unite disparate groups, advocate for equitable solutions, and foster innovation. Personally, understanding these qualities enhances my capacity to develop as a leader by emphasizing authenticity, humility, and adaptability, ultimately enabling me to positively influence my community and beyond. Culturally and socially, effective leadership fosters respect, resilience, and progress, making it an essential element for societal well-being and global stability.

References

• Maxwell, J. C. (1998). The 21 Irrefutable Laws of Leadership: Follow Them and People Will Follow You. Thomas Nelson.
• Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. Harper & Row.
• Goleman, D. (2000). Leadership that Gets Results. Harvard Business Review, 78(2), 4-17.
• Greenleaf, R. K. (1977). Servant Leadership: A Journey into the Nature of Legitimate Power and Greatness. Paulist Press.
• Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and Practice. Sage Publications.
• Bass, B. M., & Bass, R. (2008). The Bass Handbook of Leadership: Theory, Research, and Managerial Applications. Free Press.
• Shamir, B., House, R. J., & Arthur, M. B. (1993). The Motivational Effects of Charismatic Leadership. Organizational Science, 4(4), 577-593.
• Liden, R. C., et al. (2008). Servant Leadership: Development of a Multidimensional Measure and Multi-Level Assessment. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(2), 161-177.
• Yukl, G. (2012). Leadership in Organizations. Pearson.
• Antonakis, J., & Day, D. V. (2017). The Nature of Leadership. Sage Publications.