All Submissions Require References Assignment Form
All Submissions Require Referencesassignment Form To Use For This Ind
All submissions require references. Assignment form to use for this individual project in reading assignment section of this phase. Given the importance of individuals in determining business success, discuss any two of the following issues providing examples wherever possible. Format your report so that each section will be clearly identified; including a brief introduction/background of the topic; provide examples and scenarios as needed; citations and references to support your rationale. Try to give approximately equal weight to each topic chosen.
1. Entrepreneurs are a fundamental part of business success in today’s society. Discuss using real-world examples of successful business entrepreneurs to illustrate your points.
2. Strategic Management is only a function of top management. Other layers of management are not involved. State whether you agree or disagree with the statement, explaining your reasons.
3. When developing an organizational structure, what are some of the key considerations? Discuss giving real-world examples to illustrate your points where possible. Choose a company and discuss what type of organizational structure it has and comment on whether you feel comfortable operating in that type of structure, explaining your reasons.
Paper For Above instruction
Introduction
In the dynamic landscape of business, the influence of individuals—particularly entrepreneurs—and organizational structures play vital roles in shaping success. This paper explores two key issues: the critical role of entrepreneurs in business growth and the considerations involved in developing effective organizational structures. Through analyzing real-world examples and academic insights, the discussion aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of these aspects and their impact on organizational performance.
Entrepreneurs and Business Success
Entrepreneurs are often regarded as the driving force behind innovation, economic development, and job creation. They identify opportunities, take risks, and mobilize resources to turn ideas into viable businesses. The successes of entrepreneurs like Elon Musk, founder of Tesla and SpaceX, exemplify how entrepreneurial vision can revolutionize industries. Musk’s ventures have not only advanced electric vehicle technology but also expanded space exploration, showcasing entrepreneurial influence on technological progress and economic growth (Hitt et al., 2016).
Similarly, Sara Blakely's journey from a door-to-door fax machine salesperson to the founder of Spanx illustrates how entrepreneurial resilience and innovation can lead to market disruption. Blakely’s invention transformed an entire industry of shapewear, demonstrating that entrepreneurial spirit can challenge established players and generate new market opportunities (Acs et al., 2014).
Entrepreneurs also contribute to societal development by creating employment and fostering competition. For instance, Jack Ma’s Alibaba revolutionized e-commerce in China, enabling millions of small businesses to access global markets. Such examples underscore the significant role entrepreneurs play in economic vitality and innovation (Shane, 2003).
Strategic Management: A Collective Function
The assertion that strategic management is solely a top management function is a common misconception. While top executives typically formulate organizational strategy, effective strategic management involves multiple layers of management. Middle and operational managers contribute valuable insights, implement strategies, and ensure alignment across departments (Barney & Hesterly, 2015). This collaborative approach enhances strategic agility and execution.
For example, Google’s strategic initiatives are driven by executives, but the successful implementation relies heavily on managers at various levels. Their involvement ensures that strategic objectives are communicated effectively and operationalized efficiently (Porter, 1985). Therefore, I disagree with the statement, as strategic management is a shared responsibility that leverages the expertise and perspectives of multiple organizational layers, fostering a culture of strategic alignment and continuous improvement.
Considerations in Developing Organizational Structures
Designing an organizational structure requires considering factors such as company size, industry, culture, and strategic objectives. For example, a startup may adopt a flat, flexible structure to encourage innovation and rapid decision-making, while a multinational corporation might employ a hierarchical structure to manage complexity and coordinate diverse operations (Daft, 2016).
Take Toyota, for instance, which employs a functional organizational structure emphasizing divisions based on functions such as production, marketing, and finance. This structure facilitates specialization, operational efficiency, and quality control, aligning with Toyota's strategic goal of continuous improvement (Kaizen). Operating within such a structure appeals to me because it promotes clear roles, accountability, and systematic processes, although it requires effective communication to avoid siloed thinking (Hitt et al., 2016).
In contrast, a more organic structure like that of Google fosters innovation and adaptability, which I also find appealing. The flexible communication channels and collaborative environment allow for creative problem-solving—a vital aspect in technology-driven sectors (Google’s structure is largely flat and project-based, promoting autonomy among teams).
Conclusion
Understanding the pivotal role of entrepreneurs enhances appreciation of their contribution to economic development and innovation. Simultaneously, recognizing that strategic management is a collective effort among various organizational levels underscores the importance of collaborative leadership. When developing organizational structures, a careful balance of flexibility and clarity, tailored to strategic goals and operational contexts, is essential. These insights collectively emphasize that successful organizations leverage human capital and structural design effectively to sustain competitive advantage.
References
- Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., & Lehmann, E. E. (2014). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 28(1), 1-20.
- Barney, J. B., & Hesterly, W. S. (2015). Strategic management and competitive advantage: Concepts and cases. Pearson.
- Daft, R. L. (2016). Organization Theory and Design. Cengage Learning.
- Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Hoskisson, R. E. (2016). Strategic Management: Competitiveness and Globalization. Cengage Learning.
- Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. Free Press.
- Shane, S. (2003). A general theory of entrepreneurship: The individual-opportunity nexus. Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Hoskisson, R. E. (2016). Strategic Management. Cengage.
- Additional scholarly sources as needed to support specific examples.