All The Readings For Each Week Of The Syllabus Should Be Cov
Allthe Readings For Each Week Of The Syllabus Should Be Covered In The
All the readings for each week of the syllabus should be covered in the corresponding Review. The degree of attention and space you devote to each reading in your review, however, is up to you. The point is not to write a detailed summary of the readings but to identify the key and salient points of each author’s findings and assertions. You can, but you do not need to, write these reviews in essay format; you can simply name the author and identify key arguments/points that you think are most important in that particular reading.
Your grade for each review will depend on: A. The comprehensiveness of your coverage, i.e., inclusion of the assigned readings and materials; B. Meeting the minimum of required pages; C. Following the format provided here; D. Timely submission. A minimum of a 5-page review on the required readings/materials for every two weeks is mandatory.
The review must be typed double-spaced, with one-inch margins and font 12 format. Must bold the names of authors. Try to identify key points/main ideas of each reading. Contrast and compare relevant and related reading materials when a comparison is appropriate. For the video/audio lectures (or conversations) that are required for a review, you need to focus, as is the case with the readings, on identifying a few main ideas and key points. Avoid long quotations.
Recommended readings and videos are NOT required on the reviews and will not be on the exam. Readings that are marked as ‘not necessary for reviews’ are not needed for the reviews but may be on the exam.
Paper For Above instruction
The assignment requires a comprehensive yet concise weekly review of all assigned readings and materials from the syllabus, focusing on succinctly capturing the key points, arguments, and findings of each author. Unlike detailed summaries, these reviews should highlight the salient ideas, comparisons, and contrasts among readings where appropriate, demonstrating a clear understanding of the core concepts without excessive quotation or paraphrasing. The reviews must adhere to specific formatting guidelines: a minimum of five pages, double-spaced, 12-point font, with one-inch margins, and with author names boldly presented. The emphasis should be on critical identification of main ideas, ensuring coverage of all assigned materials and aligning with the provided structural format. Timeliness in submission and thoroughness of content are essential for achieving a favorable grade. It is important to recognize that while supplementary media such as videos and audios are part of the course materials, they are not mandatory in reviews, though they should be approached with the same focus on main ideas and key points. The primary goal is to develop comprehensive, cohesive, and well-structured reviews that reflect analytical engagement with the coursework, facilitating both learning and assessment.
Throughout the course, students are expected to craft biweekly reflective reviews that synthesize the readings and discussions, emphasizing the salient findings of each author while comparing and contrasting related materials. Such engagement encourages critical thinking, comprehension, and the ability to distill complex information into clear, manageable insights. Achieving this balance requires a disciplined approach to reading, note-taking, and writing, ensuring that all key points are captured meaningfully within the specified length and formatting requirements. This structured review process ultimately aims to deepen students’ understanding of the course content and prepare them for examinations or assessments based on the material covered.
References
- APA Citation of relevant course materials or texts used for the review.
- Author, A. (Year). Title of the work. Journal/Publisher.
- Another, B. (Year). Title of the related article. Journal or source.
- Additional credible sources supporting the key points discussed.
- Further scholarly references that align with the course readings.