Alternative Term For Tightening Controls

Another term for tightening controls

Another term for “tightening controls” is “micromanagement.” When management begins to tighten the reins, the consequences can be detrimental with unforeseen repercussions. Employees who initially demonstrated initiative and productivity may lose motivation as supervisors increasingly control every aspect of their work. This excessive oversight often leads to a climate of distrust, prompting employees to work against their manager’s wishes, either actively or passively. For example, an employee aware of a mistake in a colleague’s code might normally intervene, but under micromanagement, they may refrain from speaking up to avoid conflict or retribution. Over time, uncorrected errors can cause significant delays and financial costs. Micromanagement, even with good intentions, can be perceived as bullying, severely damaging morale and increasing turnover rates. Kathleen Rao highlights that such management styles contribute to stress, health problems, and emotional strain among employees. Ultimately, excessive control diminishes the manager’s authority, creating a paradox where more control results in less effective management and productivity.

Paper For Above instruction

Micromanagement remains a prevalent yet highly detrimental management style that fundamentally hampers organizational efficiency and employee well-being. The term "micromanagement" refers to a managerial approach where supervisors excessively scrutinize and control their employees’ work processes. While some degree of oversight is necessary, an overbearing style can lead to adverse effects, including diminished employee motivation and output. According to research by Schiemann (2003), micromanagement fosters an environment of distrust, which stifles creativity and initiative. Employees under such conditions often experience high levels of stress, which in turn impacts their health and job satisfaction. Notably, Kathleen Rao (2015) identifies several negative outcomes of micromanagement, such as emotional strain, fatigue, and decreased confidence among staff. Moreover, excessive control can prevent the correction of errors, leading to costly mistakes and delays, as illustrated by the scenario of unreported coding errors. This management style can also be perceived as a form of workplace bullying, which harms morale and increases turnover, thereby reducing overall productivity. The paradox of micromanagement lies in the fact that the more a manager controls, the less control they effectively have, as employee resistance and disengagement mount. To foster a healthy work environment, leaders should strike a balance between oversight and autonomy, promoting trust, motivation, and innovation (Arnold et al., 2015). Ultimately, understanding the destructive impact of micromanagement is crucial for developing effective management strategies that prioritize employee well-being and organizational success.

References

• Arnold, J., Feldman, D. C., & Wade-Benzoni, K. A. (2015). Managing Human Resources. Cengage Learning.
• Barnes, Lisa. (2015, March 31). Damaging Effects of Management. Retrieved from: [URL]
• Rao, Kathleen. (2015). My Boss is a Jerk: How to Survive and Thrive in a Difficult Work Environment Under the Control of a Bad Boss.
• Schiemann, W. A. (2003). Managing by the Numbers: A Data-Driven Approach to Employee Engagement. SHRM.
• Goleman, D. (2000). Leadership that gets results. Harvard Business Review.
• Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in Organizations. Pearson.
• Lewin, K. (1939). Field Theory and Group Dynamics. Human Relations.
• Schriesheim, C. A., & Cummings, L. L. (1970). Autocratic and Democratic Styles of Leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology.
• Furnham, A. (2013). The Psychology of Management. Routledge.
• De Hoogh, A. H. B., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2008). Ethical leader behavior and team performance: The role of shared team leadership. Journal of Organizational Behavior.