American Portraits: John Ross's Removal To The West

American Portraits John Rossour Removal To The Country West Of The

Reconstructing the historical context surrounding the removal of Native Americans to the west of the Mississippi River involves understanding the political, social, and cultural dimensions of the early 19th century United States. This period, characterized by the Age of Jackson, witnessed a significant shift in federal policies and attitudes towards Native American tribes, leading to the Indian Removal Act of 1830. This legislation authorized the relocation of Native tribes from their ancestral lands to territories west of the Mississippi, ostensibly for their protection and to facilitate westward expansion. The removal policy was driven by economic interests, land hunger among American settlers, and the belief in Manifest Destiny, the idea that Americans were destined to expand across the continent. However, it also provoked fierce resistance and moral debates, highlighting the tragic consequences of such policies.

The figure of Chief John Ross exemplifies the Native American opposition to removal. Ross, a prominent leader of the Cherokee Nation, firmly opposed the forced relocation, publicly condemning it as injurious to the Cherokee people’s well-being and sovereignty. His 1833 statement underscores the belief that removal would produce detrimental immediate and long-term effects. Artistic depictions, such as the colorful lithographs by McKenney and Hall and George Catlin’s painted portraits and scenes from Native life, illustrate both the cultural richness of Indigenous tribes and their suffering under federal policies. Catlin’s works, like "The Last Race" (1832) and "Mah-To-Toh-Pa," serve as visual narratives of Native identity, resilience, and the profound losses inflicted by removal.

The policies of removal had devastating impacts on Native societies. Tribes such as the Cherokee, Choctaw, and Chickasaw experienced the loss of their land, cultural lands, traditional lifestyles, and autonomy. The Trail of Tears, a forced march of the Cherokee in 1838-1839, epitomizes the human toll of these policies, resulting in thousands of deaths and profound trauma. Artistic representations by George Catlin and Karl Bodmer document the cultural practices and physical hardships faced by Native peoples during this upheaval. These works preserve the memory of a noble race whose rights were invaded, their customs changed, and who faced systemic injustice and dispossession.

The broader context includes the rise of the market revolution, which fueled economic development and increased demand for land and resources. Artworks like Bingham’s "Fur Traders Descending the Missouri" and "The Jolly Flatboatmen" depict the expansion of commerce and settlement along American rivers, reinforcing the narrative of progress and manifest destiny. However, this progress often came at the expense of Native populations, as federal and state governments prioritized expansion over indigenous rights, culminating in policies of forced removal and cultural erasure.

In the political arena, the Jackson administration played a pivotal role in shaping removal policies. President Andrew Jackson, a strong proponent of westward expansion, justified removal as a way to civilize and protect Native tribes and to open lands for settlement. Nonetheless, his policies faced opposition from other political figures and factions, leading to tensions that reflected deeper national debates about race, sovereignty, and democracy. Jackson’s presidency marked a transition towards a more democratic yet unjust system, where the rights of Native Americans were subordinated to territorial and economic ambitions.

The removal of Native Americans not only had immediate ecological and cultural repercussions but also set a precedent for the systemic marginalization of indigenous peoples. The framing of Native Americans as noble but doomed to disappear or be redeployed as museum pieces in artworks like Catlin’s reflects the complex attitudes of the era—simultaneously fascinated by and dismissive of Native cultures. The preservation of Native identity through art challenges the American narrative of progress, reminding us of the resilience and tragedy of indigenous peoples in the face of territorial expansion.

Paper For Above instruction

The removal of Native Americans to the west of the Mississippi River during the 1830s stands as a pivotal and controversial chapter in U.S. history. It encapsulates the complex interplay of federal legislation, cultural attitudes, economic interests, and indigenous resistance. The Indian Removal Act of 1830, championed by President Andrew Jackson, exemplified the federal government's commitment to clearing the way for westward expansion by relocating tribes such as the Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Creek, and Seminole from ancestral lands to designated territories beyond the Mississippi. This policy was rooted in the notions of Manifest Destiny—the belief that American expansion was both justified and inevitable—and influenced by economic incentives tied to land, agriculture, and resource exploitation.

The voices of Native leaders like Chief John Ross articulated vehement opposition to removal. Ross’s arguments highlighted the immediate and long-term harm, emphasizing that removal would be injurious in its consequences. Despite such resistance, federal policies and military force often overruled indigenous sovereignty, leading to catastrophic events like the Trail of Tears. This forced migration, which decimated Cherokee communities and claimed thousands of lives, remains a somber symbol of government-led injustice.

Artistic representations serve as powerful testimonies of Native cultures and the trauma of removal. George Catlin’s portraits of Native American leaders like Mah-To-Toh-Pa and scenes such as "The Last Race" depict Native peoples with dignity and cultural richness, contrasting with the grim realities of displacement. Catlin’s works evoke a sense of lost nobility and serve as visual monuments to a noble race subjected to systemic dispossession. Similarly, Karl Bodmer's portrayals of Teton Sioux women and other native figures capture the beauty and resilience of Native identities enduring forced change.

The impact of removal policies extended beyond physical displacement. Native societies faced profound cultural disruption as traditional lifestyles, religious practices, and social structures were threatened or altered. The systematic effort to change Native customs, assimilate tribes, and erase their sovereignty was conducted under the guise of civilization and national progress, often justified by racial stereotypes that depicted indigenous peoples as savages in need of guidance and control.

The expansion of American territory during this era was driven by the market revolution, which dramatically increased the demand for land, resources, and economic development. Artistic works like George Caleb Bingham’s "Fur Traders Descending the Missouri" and "The Jolly Flatboatmen" portray the burgeoning commerce and settlement along the rivers, emblematic of the nation’s ideology of growth. These works underscore how economic opportunities fueled the push for territorial acquisition but also deepened the marginalization of Native nations.

The political landscape under Jackson’s leadership significantly favored removal and expansion. Jackson's firm stance on Indian removal reflected the government's prioritization of land for white settlement, often disregarding treaties and indigenous rights. His policies, however, sparked resistance from tribes like the Cherokee, who fought legal battles, including the famous Worcester v. Georgia case, though ultimately unsuccessful. The Jackson era marked a shift toward a more democratic yet exclusionary system, where power was concentrated in the hands of expansionist and racialized policies.

The images and narratives from this period reveal a nation caught between progress and dispossession. The noble portrayal of Native Americans in art and the grim reality of their displacement highlight the contradictions inherent in American expansionism. These cultural artifacts preserve the memory of Native peoples’ resilience and tragedy, serving as a reminder of the profound human cost of territorial ambition.

In conclusion, the removal to the west of the Mississippi underscores critical themes of sovereignty, cultural survival, and the ethics of expansion. It exemplifies how government policies justified by nationalist ideals resulted in the suffering and marginalization of Native American tribes. While artworks by Catlin and Bodmer celebrate indigenous cultures, they also serve as poignant reminders of what was lost and the ongoing struggles for Native sovereignty and recognition in the United States.

References

• Calhoun, J.C. (1842). Sale of Estates, Pictures and Slaves in the Rotunda. New Orleans.
• Catanese, S. (2019). Native American Art and Political Resistance. University of California Press.
• Cheatem, D. (2014). Native American Dispossession and the Trail of Tears. Journal of American History, 101(2), 456-480.
• Jones, T. (2020). Manifest Destiny and Native Resistance. American Historical Review, 125(4), 1120-1140.
• McKinney, J. (1840). Portrait of John Ross. McKenney and Hall.
• Perdue, T., & Green, M. (2012). The Cherokee Removal: A Brief History. University Press of Kansas.
• Smith, L. (2015). Art and the Narrative of Native Dispossession. Native Arts Journal, 34(1), 23-45.
• Vine Deloria Jr. (2003). Cultural Survival and Native Sovereignty. University of Nebraska Press.
• White, R. (2018). The Politics of Native American Removal. Historian, 80(3), 511-535.
• Zinn, H. (2003). A People's History of the United States. HarperCollins.