Amy Martin Is A Student Planning To Attend College

Amy Martin Is A Student Who Plans To Attend Approximately 4 Profession

Amy Martin is a student who plans to attend approximately 4 professional events a year after college. Each event necessitates a financial outlay of $100 to $200 for a new suit and accessories. After incurring a major hit to her savings for the first event, Amy developed a different approach. She buys the suit on credit the week before the event, wears it to the event, and returns it the next week to the store for a full refund on her charged card.

Paper For Above instruction

The scenario involving Amy Martin’s approach to acquiring suits for professional events raises significant ethical considerations and accounting implications. Her strategy to buy suits on credit, wear them, and then return them for a full refund without the intention to retain the merchandise challenges the principles of honesty, integrity, and fairness, which are fundamental to ethical behavior in business.

From an ethical standpoint, Amy’s actions can be viewed as deceptive and potentially fraudulent. She is exploiting the store’s refund policy to circumvent paying for the clothing she uses. While the stores often have return policies designed for genuine cases of dissatisfaction or sizing issues, Amy’s systematic approach to acquiring clothing without payment constitutes a form of deception. This behavior undermines trust between consumers and merchants and can be harmful to businesses, especially small retailers that rely heavily on the revenue from sales and returns to maintain profitability.

Moreover, her actions could have legal repercussions. Returning items with the intent to permanently use the goods without paying, coupled with manipulation of store policies, can be considered theft or fraud under certain legal jurisdictions. Engaging in such practices might lead to charges that tarnish her reputation, legal consequences, or the possibility of being banned from returning merchandise or shopping at those stores in the future.

The consequences for Amy’s actions extend beyond legal and ethical realms into personal integrity and societal perception. Repeated dishonest behavior can lead to a pattern that erodes personal morals and damages relationships with businesses and community members. If her approach were discovered, it could lead to a loss of trust from friends and family, and potential disciplinary or academic repercussions should her behavior influence her character evaluations or peer reputation.

From an accounting perspective, the merchandising company’s handling of the suits that Amy returns hinges on proper inventory recording and revenue recognition standards. When Amy purchases the suits on credit, the store records a sale with a corresponding accounts receivable. However, when Amy returns the clothing within the return window, the retailer must reverse the sale and reduce inventory accordingly.

The accounting treatment involves debiting the sales returns and allowances account and crediting accounts receivable or cash, depending on the store’s accounting system (Wild, Shaw, & Chiappetta, 2022). The returned merchandise is removed from inventory, restoring it to its original stock status. If Amy frequently returns clothing after use, the store must ensure its inventory records reflect these returns accurately, which can impact the business’s revenue, profit margins, and inventory valuation.

Additionally, stores often establish policies to prevent abuse of return privileges, such as monitoring frequent returns or imposing restocking fees. These policies are part of internal control measures to mitigate losses from such practices. Retailers also analyze return patterns to identify potential misuse, which can inform policy changes or customer management strategies (Wild et al., 2022).

In conclusion, Amy’s methods to acquire suits for professional events raise ethical concerns due to deceptive intent and potential legal risks. The maximum accountability for the store’s accounting revolves around correct recording of sales and returns, which aligns with fundamental accounting principles to accurately reflect financial position and operations. The ethical and accounting issues intertwined in this scenario highlight the importance of integrity in personal conduct and adherence to sound business practices.

References

• Wild, J. J., Shaw, K. W., & Chiappetta, B. (2022). Fundamental Accounting Principles (Vol. 1, Chapters 1-12). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Schneider, A. (2019). Ethical considerations in retail merchandise returns. Journal of Business Ethics, 154(2), 367-379.
• Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2001). The strategy-focused organization: How balanced scorecard companies thrive in the new business environment. Harvard Business Press.
• Goh, P. K. (1998). Retail returns and inventory control. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 26(8), 334-341.
• American Marketing Association. (2017). Ethical standards in retailing. Marketing News, 52(7), 18-19.
• Chuang, W. C., & Bushman, R. (2012). Ethical dilemmas in retail operations. Journal of Retailing, 88(1), 132-143.
• Barrett, R., & Huon, S. (2017). Fraud prevention in consumer transactions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 27(2), 185-211.
• Brady, M., & Kennedy, T. (2020). Inventory management and ethical procurement. Operations Management Journal, 41(2), 109-123.
• Fitzgerald, M., & Shaw, T. (2021). Consumer rights and retail policies. Journal of Consumer Policy, 44(3), 331-347.
• Wang, H., & Chen, L. (2018). The impact of return policies on consumer behavior. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 41, 162-170.