An African American Mother Is Concerned That Her Child May B

An African American Mother Is Concerned That Her Child May Have An Att

An African American mother is concerned that her child may have an attention deficit problem. She approaches the teacher, who supports her concerns, and together they request the assistant principal to conduct testing for a possible learning disorder. The mother asks if the child could undergo an individual intelligence test that screens for such issues. The assistant principal responds that such tests have been banned for minority students due to concerns about cross-cultural bias. Despite the mother's willingness to give permission, the assistant principal insists on alternative assessments and observation. This situation raises questions about its ethical, professional, and legal appropriateness.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

This case presents a complex dilemma involving ethical, legal, and professional considerations related to psychological assessment and cultural equity in education. An African American mother seeks testing for her child's suspected attention deficit issues, but her request conflicts with school policies influenced by concerns over cultural bias. As a school counselor or psychologist, it is essential to analyze this situation thoroughly to ensure ethical practices while respecting legal mandates and cultural sensitivities.

1. Identify the problem or dilemma

The core issue centers on whether the assistant principal's refusal to administer an individual intelligence test, based on the child's racial background and the purported ban, is ethically justified. The mother seeks appropriate assessment to support her child's educational needs, and her autonomy and right to informed consent are challenged by school policies that may reflect broader systemic biases. The dilemma involves balancing the need for accurate diagnosis against institutional policies and the ethical obligation to provide equitable assessment practices.

2. Identify the potential issues involved

Several issues emerge from this scenario. Firstly, the ethical concern of racial bias in testing instruments, potentially leading to discrimination or misidentification of learning problems among minority students. Secondly, the legal issue relates to the student's and parent's rights to access appropriate educational assessments, including individual intelligence testing under laws like the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Thirdly, professional responsibilities involve adhering to ethical guidelines that emphasize cultural fairness, informed consent, and the avoidance of discrimination. Additionally, the possibility of systemic bias influencing school policies warrants critical examination.

3. Review the relevant ethical guidelines

The American Psychological Association's (APA) Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct emphasize several pertinent principles:

- Principle A (Beneficence and Nonmaleficence) mandates professionals to maximize benefit and minimize harm, including ensuring assessments are valid and fair (APA, 2017).

- Principle C (Justice) requires equitable access to psychological services, and the avoidance of discrimination based on race or culture (APA, 2017).

- Standard 9.01 (Bases for Assessments) insists that psychologists select, administer, and interpret assessment procedures fairly and with cultural competence (APA, 2017).

- Standard 9.08 (Test Scoring and Interpretation) emphasizes that assessment results should be based on appropriate norms and interpretations respectful of cultural differences.

In addition, the Ethical Standards discourage practices that incorporate racial or cultural bias, and encourage advocacy for clients' rights to fair assessment procedures.

4. Know the applicable laws and regulations

Legally, the Educational Rights of students, especially under the IDEA, ensure that children with suspected disabilities must receive appropriate assessments, including intelligence testing if deemed necessary, to determine eligibility for special services (U.S. Department of Education, 2004). Schools are mandated to provide nondiscriminatory testing and to avoid policies that unjustly exclude or disadvantage minority students. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act prohibits racial discrimination in education programs and activities receiving federal assistance, emphasizing fairness and equal access (U.S. Department of Education, 1964). Therefore, bans on specific testing based solely on race could violate students’ civil rights and federal law.

5. Obtain consultation

In such ethically ambiguous situations, seeking consultation from a qualified ethics committee, supervisor, or professional association (like APA or NASP) is essential. These consultations help clarify whether policies are lawful and ethical, and guide decisions that respect both legal standards and professional integrity. Discussing with legal counsel or school district officials can also provide clarity on whether the ban is justified or if exceptions can be granted for individual assessments in specific cases.

6. Consider possible and probable courses of action

Several options are available:

- Advocate for the mother’s right to consent to the assessment, emphasizing the importance of individualized evaluation regardless of race.

- Engage with school administrators to review policies critically and ensure they align with legal requirements and ethical standards.

- Explore alternative assessment methods that are culturally fair and validated, ensuring the child's needs are addressed properly.

- Provide psychoeducation to the mother about the assessment options, limitations, and the importance of culturally competent testing.

- If necessary, pursue independent testing outside the school system to obtain an objective assessment.

7. Enumerate the consequences of various decisions

Allowing the mother to proceed with standardized intelligence testing can lead to more accurate diagnosis and appropriate interventions, thereby supporting the child's educational success. It aligns with ethical standards of fairness and client autonomy but may challenge the institution's policies or ignite controversy over bans perceived as racially discriminatory. Conversely, denying the assessment could perpetuate inequities and deny the child access to needed services, potentially violating legal rights under IDEA and civil rights legislation. An ethically grounded decision balances respecting cultural sensitivity while advocating for equitable treatment for minority students.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the situation underscores the importance of culturally competent assessment and adherence to legal and ethical standards that promote fairness and equity. The assistant principal’s stance, rooted in a ban influenced by concerns over cross-cultural bias, raises ethical questions about discrimination and the rights of minority students. As a school counselor or psychologist, advocating for individualized evaluation, ensuring informed consent, consulting with relevant authorities, and emphasizing culturally sensitive practices are paramount. This approach ensures that all children receive the assessments they need to thrive educationally, without bias or discrimination.

References

• American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. Retrieved from https://www.apa.org/ethics/code
• U.S. Department of Education. (2004). Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq.
• U.S. Department of Education. (1964). Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Pub. L. No. 88-352.