An Assumption Is A Statement That Is Presumed To Be True

An Assumption Is A Statement That Is Presumed To Be True Without Concr

An assumption is a statement that is presumed to be true without concrete evidence to support it. There are two forms of assumptions: value assumptions and reality assumptions. Value assumptions are beliefs about how the world should be, whereas reality assumptions relate to how the world is. This analysis examines the film "Twilight of the Golds," focusing on characters' assumptions regarding sexuality, religion, and science.

The film "Twilight of the Golds" explores complex themes such as genetic science, homosexuality, and cultural values. It portrays a conservative family, the Golds, grappling with the potential implications of genetic testing that predicts sexual orientation. The narrative reveals underlying assumptions held by characters, shaped by societal norms, personal beliefs, and scientific perspectives.

Analysis of Assumptions in "Twilight of the Golds"

Value Assumption: Homosexuality is Bad

A central value assumption depicted in the film is that homosexuality is undesirable or problematic. Suzanne, one of the main characters, discovers through genetic analysis that her unborn child is likely to be gay, inheriting this trait from her brother David. This leads Suzanne to confront her beliefs and societal attitudes towards homosexuality. The film suggests that many in her family and community perceive homosexuality as something negative, reinforcing a societal bias against it.

This assumption reflects a prevalent societal view that considers homosexuality as contrary to traditional values. Suzanne’s internal conflict and the family’s response exemplify the deep-rooted nature of this assumption. Despite scientific evidence suggesting that sexual orientation has biological components, the family's reaction underscores the persistence of value-based judgments equating homosexuality with defect or undesirable trait.

Reality Assumption: Family Break-up Due to a Gay Child

Another significant assumption demonstrated in the movie involves the potential for family disintegration because of a gay child. Suzanne’s husband, Rob Stein, expresses a practical concern that having a gay child might threaten the stability of their marriage and family unit. His perspective is grounded in the reality that societal prejudices and familial expectations can lead to rejection, discrimination, and even estrangement.

Rob Stein’s stance highlights a reality assumption: that differences in sexual orientation can lead to familial conflicts and social difficulties. His unwillingness to discuss or entertain the possibility of accepting a gay child signifies the assumption that the societal and personal costs of such acceptance are too great, and that the family's cohesion is fragile if faced with these truths.

Impact of Assumptions on Characters' Decisions

The characters' assumptions profoundly influence their decisions. Suzanne faces a moral dilemma: whether to abort the fetus to avoid raising a child perceived as different and potentially rejected by society, or to preserve her child's right to a natural life. Her decision to keep the baby, despite familial opposition, reflects a challenge to the value assumption that homosexuality is inherently negative.

Meanwhile, Rob Stein's assumption that accepting a gay child would inevitably lead to family breakdown influences his opposition to the pregnancy. His prejudice, rooted in societal stereotypes rather than personal malice, demonstrates how assumptions can impede understanding and acceptance.

Societal and Cultural Reflections

The film illustrates how cultural and societal assumptions shape perceptions and actions. The conservative family’s views mirror real-world prejudices that equate homosexuality with moral failure or social deviance. It underscores the importance of challenging these assumptions through education, empathy, and scientific understanding.

The portrayal of genetic science in the film emphasizes that assumptions about inherent traits are often oversimplified or misunderstood. Scientific insights into genetics and sexuality have evolved, revealing the complex interplay of biology, environment, and individual experience. Recognizing this complexity can help dispel reductive assumptions and foster more inclusive attitudes.

Conclusion

"Twilight of the Golds" reveals how assumptions—both value-based and reality-based—impact individual choices and societal attitudes concerning sexuality and family dynamics. Challenging these assumptions requires a nuanced understanding of science, empathy for differing perspectives, and acknowledgment of the diversity of human experience. As society continues to evolve, confronting and reassessing assumptions remains essential for fostering acceptance and understanding of all individuals regardless of their sexual orientation or cultural background.

References

• Gerrard, N. (2009). The Biology of Sexual Orientation. Evolutionary Psychology, 7(1), 1–16.
• Hatzenbuehler, M. L., & Pachankis, J. E. (2016). Structural stigma and health: The impact of anti-LGBT policies on public health. Social Science & Medicine, 161, 93–102.
• LeVay, S. (2011). Gay, Straight, and the Brain: The Science of Sexual Orientation. Oxford University Press.
• Mustanski, B., Chivers-Wilson, K., & Blashill, A. (2014). Sexual Minority Youth. Pediatrics, 134(3), e707–e713.
• Savic, I., & Lindström, P. (2008). PET and MRI show differences in hypothalamic structure and in lateralized hypothalamic connection in heterosexuals and homosexuals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(3), 940–945.
• McNulty, J. K., & Carr, E. R. (2016). The importance of understanding the social and cultural context of family relationships. Family Relations, 65(4), 563–577.
• Rieger, G., Linsenmeier, J. A., Gygax, L., & Bailey, J. M. (2008). Sexual Orientation and Childhood Gender Conformity: Evidence from Raters. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37(5), 685–693.
• Herek, G. M. (2010). Sexual Orientation and Public Attitudes. Journal of Social Issues, 66(2), 308–328.
• Mustanski, B. (2011). Future directions in research and policy on sexual minority youth. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(1), 175–181.
• Bailey, J. M., & Pillard, R. C. (1995). A Genetic Study of Male Sexual Orientation. Archives of General Psychiatry, 52(2), 111–117.