An Organizational Structure Differs From One Business 271278

An Organizational Structure Differs From One Business To Another Wat

An organizational structure differs from one business to another. Watch the video “How to align the organizational structure with the work processes.” Imagine you were taking a CEO position at one of the following organizations: Theme Park (3 parks located within United States), Hospital (in your hometown), Bank (10 locations in Florida), or W & T Products (supplier of products you sell to Big Box retailers such as Target, Walmart, grocery stores, etc.). Briefly describe the type of structure your organization would have (functional, divisional, or matrix) based on the company you decide you want to work as CEO. Why did you choose this particular structure? How would this structure be effective in accomplishing organizational goals? What do you think would be some advantages and disadvantages of your chosen structure?

Paper For Above instruction

As an aspiring CEO, selecting an appropriate organizational structure is crucial to aligning business processes with strategic goals. For this analysis, I will assume the role of CEO of W & T Products, a supplier of consumer goods such as toothpaste, toothbrushes, cosmetics, shampoo, and conditioner to major retailers such as Target, Walmart, and various grocery stores. Given the nature of W & T Products' operations, I propose adopting a divisional organizational structure. This structure would be segmented based on product lines or customer markets, facilitating effective management and streamlined operations.

The divisional structure is well-suited for W & T Products because it allows the organization to focus on specific product categories or customer segments, enabling tailored strategies and marketing. Since W & T distributes a diverse portfolio of products, having dedicated divisions for each product category—such as oral care, cosmetics, and hair care—would enable specialized management, improved responsiveness to market changes, and better customer service. This setup promotes operational efficiency by decentralizing decision-making, allowing divisions to adapt quickly to industry trends and retailer demands.

The effectiveness of this structure hinges on its capacity to enhance organizational agility, foster innovation within product categories, and improve coordination with retail partners. Each division can develop targeted marketing campaigns, manage supply chains more effectively, and respond swiftly to consumer preferences. Furthermore, the divisional setup encourages accountability, as division managers are responsible for their divisions' performance, motivating better results and continuous improvement.

However, the divisional structure also has disadvantages. One significant challenge is the potential duplication of resources, which may lead to increased operational costs. For example, each division might maintain its own sales teams, marketing departments, and supply chain management, resulting in inefficiencies. Additionally, internal competition among divisions could arise, possibly creating conflicts over resources or strategic priorities. There's also a risk of siloed thinking, where divisions become isolated from each other, hindering overall organizational cohesion and knowledge sharing.

Overall, selecting a divisional organizational structure for W & T Products aligns with the company's need for agility, product specialization, and customer focus. While it offers several advantages in managing diverse product lines and fostering innovation, careful management is essential to mitigate potential disadvantages such as resource duplication and siloed operations. By implementing effective communication channels and integrating strategies across divisions, W & T Products can optimize its organizational effectiveness and achieve its strategic goals.

References

• Daft, R. L. (2018). Organization Theory and Design (13th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Jones, G. R. (2013). Organizational Theory, Design, and Change (7th ed.). Pearson Education.
• Robbins, S. P., & Coulter, M. (2018). Management (13th ed.). Pearson.
• Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Hoskisson, R. E. (2017). Strategic Management: Concepts and Cases (12th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Wild, J. J., & Han, D. (2014). International Logistics: The Supply Chain Imperative (4th ed.). Pearson.
• Jones, G. R., & George, J. M. (2017). Contemporary Management (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Mintzberg, H. (1983). Structure in Fives: Designing Effective Organizations. Prentice-Hall.
• Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2004). Strategy Maps: Converting Intangible Assets into Tangible Outcomes. Harvard Business Review Press.
• Child, J. (1972). Organizational Structure, environment, and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology, 6(1), 1-22.
• Anthony, R. N., & Govindarajan, V. (2007). Management Control Systems (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill.