Analysis Based On The Above Factual Data Collected And Compl ✓ Solved

Analysis Based on the above factual data collected and complied

We now proceed to analyze the financial position of Caterpillar Inc. with respect to its competitors and the industry. The analysis is based on various parameters calculated above and measured based on yardsticks such as liquidity, activity, leverage, profitability, market value, and market-to-book ratio.

Liquidity

The first and foremost parameter to study liquidity is net working capital. It can be observed that the net working capital has dropped by USD 2.87 billion when compared to 2014. The operating cash flows have also dropped significantly by USD 4.51 billion. This situation, prima facie, appears alarming. However, on careful evaluation, it can be observed that the main competitor has witnessed a drop of USD 3.08 billion in their net working capital numbers. The current ratio has remained stable, fluctuating only from 1.39 to 1.31, while revenues have dipped by 85% (from USD 55 billion to USD 47 billion). Thus, despite the drop in net working capital, the stable current ratio indicates that there are no inefficiencies regarding working capital management.

Interestingly, the overall market for manufacturing earth-moving and heavy equipment has seen a slump. Revenues have dipped by 15%, and competitors' revenues have also dipped by 20%. This downturn can largely be attributed to the fall in commodity and metal prices worldwide. Despite these challenges, Caterpillar has maintained a robust liquidity position with a current ratio of 2.05, which is above the industry average of 1.7. Overall, although Caterpillar's working capital and liquidity levels are not the best in the industry, the company has managed its working capital well given the capital-intensive nature of the business.

Activity

To evaluate the activity and efficiency of operations, we computed the inventory and receivable numbers in days. Inventory days have marginally increased from 112 to 116 days, while receivable days have increased from 123 to 139 days. Despite the pressures on revenues, these metrics have not drastically changed, indicating effective management by Caterpillar to keep working capital under control. In contrast, the competitor has seen an increase of 82 days in receivable days.

Leverage

The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio serves as an important measure to assess capital leverage. For Caterpillar Inc., the D/E ratios have been reported at 2.57 for the current year, compared to 2.35 for the previous year. This indicates that the company is heavily reliant on debt capital, at a ratio of 2.5 times that of shareholders' equity. This reliance has increased interest costs, making it a substantial concern as these costs consume a significant portion of the revenues.

Comparatively, the competitor's D/E ratio is alarmingly higher. This puts both Caterpillar Inc. and its competitor in a precarious position with regard to capital leverage, especially when contrasted with the industry’s average D/E ratio of only 0.69. This calls for urgent measures from Caterpillar to improve its capital structure by potentially reducing its debt through public offerings or institutional investments.

Profitability

Return on Equity (ROE) and profit margin are crucial profitability parameters worth examining. Caterpillar's ROE has dropped to 14.19% from 22.06% the previous year, primarily a result of a decrease in profit margin from 6.7% to 4.47%. The competitor’s ROE stands substantially higher at 28.775%. The disparity in profit margins highlights the operational challenges faced by Caterpillar, which must improve its profitability metrics relative to its competitors and industry averages.

Market Value

Caterpillar's market value is USD 44.47 billion compared to its competitor Deere & Co., which stands at USD 24.62 billion. Interestingly, both companies share similar stock prices, yet Caterpillar’s market value is significantly higher. This could stem from various factors such as a strong track record, reputation, and shareholder sentiments. Notably, despite a lower earnings per share (EPS) compared to Deere, Caterpillar's market value remains robust, suggesting confidence in the company's long-term prospects.

Market-to-Book Ratio

The market-to-book (M/B) ratio provides insights into whether a stock is overvalued or undervalued relative to its book value. Caterpillar’s M/B ratio stands at 3, whereas Deere & Co. has a higher ratio of 3.65, indicating that Caterpillar's stock is considered three times overvalued in the market relative to its book value. Such metrics must be analyzed with caution to avoid misleading investment decisions.

Conclusion & Recommendation

In conclusion, Caterpillar Inc. is positioned well in the industry concerning management of working capital and market value. However, it must improve profitability margins and capital leverage to compete effectively. A suggested improvement in capital structure could enhance its D/E ratio and interest coverage, enabling better long-term profitability. Given the prevailing market uncertainty in revenues and profit margins, the potential for commodity market recovery may justify a "BUY" recommendation for investors willing to look beyond short-term volatility.

References

  • Investopedia. (2023). Liquidity Ratios. Retrieved from https://www.investopedia.com/terms/l/liquidityratios.asp
  • Investopedia. (2023). Debt to Equity Ratio. Retrieved from https://www.investopedia.com/terms/d/debtequityratio.asp
  • Caterpillar Inc. (2023). Annual Financial Reports. Retrieved from https://www.caterpillar.com/en/investors.html
  • CNBC. (2023). Stock Market Analysis. Retrieved from https://www.cnbc.com/stocks/
  • The Wall Street Journal. (2023). Market Value Insights. Retrieved from https://www.wsj.com/
  • Yahoo Finance. (2023). Caterpillar Inc. Stock Information. Retrieved from https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/CAT/
  • MarketWatch. (2023). Financial Overview of Caterpillar. Retrieved from https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/cat
  • Morningstar. (2023). Company Valuation Ratios. Retrieved from https://www.morningstar.com/stocks/xnas/cat/quote
  • UBS Group AG. (2023). Industry Analysis on Heavy Equipment. Retrieved from https://www.ubs.com/
  • McKinsey & Company. (2023). Industry Insights Reports. Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/

Related Assignments