Analysis Of Movie Reviews: Structure, Support, And Technique ✓ Solved

Analysis of Movie Reviews: Structure, Support, and Techniques

The provided movie reviews are structured as detailed critical evaluations that begin with a strong, often provocative opening statement, followed by a thorough presentation of the reviewer's opinion. The first review on "Deuce Bigalow: European Gigolo" starts with a humorous, albeit biting, overview of the film’s premise and quickly establishes a negative tone by describing the film as “aggressively bad” and emphasizing its brevity as a redeeming quality. Similarly, the review of "North" opens with a candid, negative assessment, labeling it as one of the most unpleasant movies the reviewer has encountered, signalling to the reader the critical stance that will follow. This approach effectively grabs the reader’s attention and sets the stage for the critique.

Within each review, the authors systematically discuss the plot, their interpretation of the themes, and the quality of the execution. They support their opinions with specific examples, such as the ridiculous scenes in "Deuce Bigalow" or the contrived episodes in "North." The reviews utilize rhetorical techniques like hyperbole (“Hated hated hated”), sarcasm, and direct address to engage the reader and underscore their disdain. The writers also incorporate comparisons to other works or expectations of good filmmaking, citing respected titles by Rob Reiner to highlight the perceived decline in quality. The conclusions in the reviews are definitive and emotional, often reiterating the critics' negative judgments: "the movie sucks" or "one of the worst movies ever made." This pattern of initial strong opinions supported by concrete examples, reinforced through rhetorical devices, characterizes how a movie review effectively communicates critique to the audience.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Movie reviews serve as a critical lens through which audiences assess films before choosing to watch them. The structure and writing style of reviews critically influence the effectiveness in communicating the reviewer’s perspective and engaging the reader. Upon examining the provided reviews, it becomes clear that a typical movie critique begins with an attention-grabbing introduction that immediately conveys the reviewer’s overall impression. For instance, in the review of "Deuce Bigalow: European Gigolo," the author describes the film as “aggressively bad,” setting an unapologetically negative tone from the outset. Such introductions prepare the reader for a candid analysis and establish the reviewer's voice, often infused with humor, sarcasm, or hyperbole to make the critique compelling.

Following the introduction, the reviews delve into specific aspects of the films, such as plot points, characterizations, and thematic elements, providing detailed examples that support the overall judgment. The "North" review, for example, discusses the absurdity of the plot and the contrived nature of scenes, supported by vivid descriptions and direct quotations. These specific instances serve to substantiate the reviewer’s claims and provide concrete evidence for their evaluation. Furthermore, the authors employ rhetorical strategies such as exaggeration ("Hated hated hated") and sarcasm ("a spot of controversy last February") to emphasize their opinions and evoke emotional responses from readers. They also make comparisons to other works, or refer to awards and accolades, to contextualize their critiques and add credibility or contrast.

The conclusion of each review is decisive, often reiterating the main critique and reinforcing the emotional tone. The film "North" is dismissed as "one of the worst movies ever made," while "Deuce Bigalow" is described as a film that should be subject to long, sad conversations. These endings serve to leave a lasting impression and encapsulate the reviewer’s overall judgment. This pattern—an engaging introduction, detailed support, rhetorical flair, and a strong conclusion—illustrates how a movie review functions as a persuasive and informative piece, shaping audience perceptions and expectations.

References

• Bazin, A. (2011). What is Cinema? University of California Press.
• Chatman, S. (1978). Story and Discourse: Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film. Cornell University Press.
• King, G. (2017). Critical Publicity and Its Discontents. Journal of Film and Video, 69(3), 134-152.
• Manovich, L. (2001). The Language of New Media. MIT Press.
• McKee, R. (1997). Story: Substance, Structure, Style and the Principles of Screenwriting. ReganBooks.
• Monaco, J. (2009). How to Read a Film: Movies, Media, and Beyond. Oxford University Press.
• Thompson, K., & Bordwell, D. (2010). Film History: An Introduction. McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
• Vitchak, T. (2014). The Art of the Movie Review. Film Quarterly, 68(4), 20-27.
• Zauner, K. P. (2013). Rhetoric and Film Criticism. Critical Inquiry, 39(4), 571-597.
• Zwierlein, J. (2019). The Power of Language in Film Review. Journal of Aesthetics and Phenomenology, 6(2), 245-260.