Analysis Paper: Stories And Narratives - Photography Styles ✓ Solved

Analysis Paper: Stories and Narratives - Photography Styles and Influences of Selected Artists

Photography transcends mere representation, serving as a powerful storytelling medium that captures moments, conveys ideas, and reveals complex narratives through visual forms. It involves not just the act of clicking a shutter but also thoughtful staging, lighting, composition, and post-production manipulations that shape a story's message and emotional impact. This analysis compares two distinguished photographers—Richard Avedon and Diane Arbus—focusing on their backgrounds, influences, techniques, aesthetic styles, and the narratives embedded within their work.

Background and Influences of Richard Avedon and Diane Arbus

Richard Avedon (1923–2004) was an American fashion and portrait photographer whose training included studying at the Merit School of Photography in New York and working for Harper's Bazaar. Avedon was influenced by the Photo-Secession movement and contemporary fashion icons, blending high art with commercial photography. His work was shaped by an evolving technology era that transitioned from film to the early digital age, affording him a refined control over image quality and print. Avedon's style is characterized by minimalistic backdrops that emphasize the subject, often highlighting the contrast between the sitter's personality and their appearance.

Diane Arbus (1923–1971), also an American photographer, was influenced by her background in fashion photography and her interest in marginalized groups. Her training was informal, gaining recognition for her raw, unflinching portraits that often staged or captured individuals on the fringes of society. Arbus worked in an era where film technology was limited to black-and-white images, which enhanced the stark, candid quality of her photographs. Her aesthetic was markedly different from Avedon’s—embracing intimacy and discomfort, often through close-up framing and gritty textures.

Technological Context: Era and Its Impact on Their Work

The technological environment during their careers greatly influenced their approaches. Avedon’s career coincided with advancements in studio lighting, camera lenses, and printing techniques, allowing him to achieve seamless, high-contrast images that conveyed clarity and emotional depth. The advent of color photography also began to influence fashion and portrait work towards the later stages of his career.

In contrast, Arbus worked predominantly with black-and-white film, which contributed to the raw, documentary feel of her images. The limitations of technology in her time necessitated meticulous manual work, fostering a focus on composition and emotional immediacy rather than post-processing manipulation. This technology environment allowed her to develop a distinctive raw and honest aesthetic that challenged traditional notions of beauty.

Formal Description of Selected Works

Richard Avedon’s Notable Work

Avedon’s portrait of Truman Capote exemplifies his signature style—an intense focus on the subject, minimal background, and a stark contrast that accentuates facial features such as expressive eyes and refined textures of the face and clothing. The composition uses a high vantage point and centered framing to establish a personal yet commanding presence. The use of high-key lighting emphasizes details, creating a sense of immediacy and transparency (Avedon, 1968).

Diane Arbus’ Notable Work

Arbus’s photograph of a dwarf playing with a toy gun captures intimacy and discomfort. The close-up framing draws attention to the subject’s facial expressions and costume, emphasizing the texture of skin and clothing. The use of natural light and high contrast heightens the raw emotional content, while frontal composition creates a confrontational mood (Arbus, 1968). Her staging often involved placing subjects in environments that magnified their unique identities, fostering narratives of societal marginalization.

Aesthetic Styles and Techniques: Similarities and Differences

Stylistic Elements

Avedon’s aesthetic is characterized by smooth, high-contrast images with a focus on clarity and elegance, often achieving a polished look suitable for magazine portraits. His use of a plain backdrop isolates the subject, emphasizing facial expressions and body language which communicate narrative depth. The aesthetic promotes an idealized, yet emotionally penetrating, presentation of his subjects (Sullivan, 2004).

Arbus’s style, alternatively, relies on gritty textures, stark lighting, and close framing to evoke intimacy, discomfort, and societal critique. Her images often seem unpolished and raw, emphasizing imperfections rather than conceal them. Her aesthetic is rooted in exploring marginalized identities and conveying social narratives that challenge viewers’ perceptions (Karshan, 2004).

Techniques

Avedon’s technique involved seamless studio setups, high-key lighting, and meticulous control over the environment to produce a clean, emotionally revealing portrait. His editing was minimal, aligning with a belief that the photograph should speak for itself, capturing the essence of the subject with clarity.

Arbus’s approach involved using natural or available light, with strict control over framing to intensify emotional impact. Her staged portraits often used props and settings that contributed to narratives of social alienation. She embraced imperfections and impermanence, often editing images minimally but deliberately to preserve authenticity.

Content and Narrative Analysis of Selected Images

Richard Avedon’s Portrait of Truman Capote

This image symbolizes the 'celebrity' but also reveals vulnerability—highlighted by the stark black-and-white palette and the intense gaze. The background’s neutrality directs viewer’s attention solely to Capote’s expression, woven with narratives of fame, intellectualism, and emotional depth. The formal composition and lighting underscore his refined personality, embedding a narrative of juxtaposed sophistication and fragility (Avedon, 1968).

Diane Arbus’s Dwarf Portrait

This photograph portrays a figure often marginalized by society. The close framing, expressive face, and unconventional costume evoke themes of societal exclusion, identity, and perception. The rawness of the image challenges cultural beauty standards and invites questions about the human condition and societal norms. The barrier of the lens becomes a bridge, telling stories of resilience amidst societal alienation (Arbus, 1968).

Connecting Their Work to Photography History and Social Context

Avedon’s work exemplifies the modernist tradition—objectivity, clarity, and focus on individual personality. His images reflect the cultural elevation of celebrity and the celebration of individual expression during the mid-20th century (Sullivan, 2004). His approach aligns with the rise of consumer culture and the influence of fashion photography as an art form.

Arbus’s work, contrastingly, embodies the documentary and social activist tradition—examining marginalized groups to evoke empathy and critique societal norms. Her images are part of a larger movement challenging representation and emphasizing authenticity, often called the 'social documentary' tradition (Korshak, 1997). Her photographs echo the societal upheaval of the 1960s, highlighting diversity, alienation, and the nuances of human identity.

Conclusion

While both Richard Avedon and Diane Arbus used photography to tell compelling stories, their techniques and aesthetics diverge in ways that deepen the viewer's understanding of their societal contexts. Avedon’s polished, idealized portraits reflect societal fascination with glamour and perfection, while Arbus’s raw, candid images confront viewers with uncomfortable truths about marginalized identities. Their work exemplifies how technology, style, and personal vision converge to craft narratives that continue to influence contemporary photography and visual storytelling.

References

• Avedon, R. (1968). Richard Avedon: Portraits. Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
• Arbus, D. (1968). Behind the Glass. Aperture.
• Korshak, J. (1997). Thinking Photography: The Creative Mind and the Camera. University of New Mexico Press.
• Sullivan, R. (2004). Avedon Portraits. Harry N. Abrams.
• Karshan, V. (2004). Diane Arbus. Abbeville Press.
• Grundberg, A. (1984). Looking at Pictures: An Introduction to Photography. Aperture.
• Balcar, M. (2018). The Evolution of Portraiture in Photography. Journal of Visual Culture.
• Perkowitz, S. (1992). The art and technique of photography. Scholarly Research Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies.
• Craven, D. (2012). The role of technology in photographic storytelling. Technology and Arts Journal.
• Higgins, M. (2010). Narrative techniques in modern photography. Visual Culture Studies.