Analyze Two Environments Within Abercr

From The E Activity Analyze Two 2 Environments Within Abercrombie

From the e-Activity, analyze two (2) environments within Abercrombie & Fitch with respect to the salient stakeholders’ influence within the environments that you identified. Determine two (2) potential risks to the salient stakeholders’ relationships with the company as a result of the company’s position that it only wants “thin and beautiful people” shopping in its store. Next, suggest two (2) risk mitigation methods that Abercrombie & Fitch could utilize. Provide a rationale for your response.

Paper For Above instruction

Abercrombie & Fitch, a renowned American retailer known for its casual wear targeting young consumers, operates in complex environments influenced by various stakeholders. Analyzing these environments helps understand how stakeholder influence shapes company strategies and the potential risks associated with a company's branding and marketing policies. This paper examines two critical environments within Abercrombie & Fitch—the cultural and social environment, and the regulatory environment—focusing on stakeholder influence and risks associated with the company's emphasis on an exclusive image based on physical appearance.

The cultural and social environment significantly affects Abercrombie & Fitch’s operations. Salient stakeholders in this domain include consumers, employees, and the broader society. Consumers influence the brand’s identity through their fashion preferences and social attitudes, while societal values shape perceptions of inclusivity and diversity. Historically, Abercrombie & Fitch cultivated a brand image predicated on a particular aesthetic—"thin and beautiful" individuals—which resonated with a specific demographic but alienated others. This strategy underscored consumer influence but also drew criticism for promoting unrealistic beauty standards, impacting societal perceptions and stakeholder relationships.

Employees also play a crucial role within this environment. The company's selective hiring practices and marketing campaigns focused on exclusivity influence employee interactions with customers and the public. The enforced image can lead to internal conflicts, especially as societal attitudes shift toward inclusivity. External societal influences, such as trending movements advocating for body positivity and diversity, threaten Abercrombie & Fitch’s branding strategy, making it susceptible to reputational risk if perceived as exclusionary or discriminatory.

The regulatory environment pertains to laws and policies related to advertising standards, employment practices, and anti-discrimination legislation. Salient stakeholders include government agencies and advocacy groups that enforce and monitor compliance. Regulations increasingly emphasize diversity and non-discrimination, challenging Abercrombie & Fitch’s exclusive branding approach. The company's historical focus on a narrow beauty standard could lead to legal challenges or social backlash, affecting its stakeholder relationships.

Two potential risks emerge from this environment. First, the risk of reputational damage arises if the company’s branding is perceived as discriminatory or exclusionary. Negative publicity can erode customer trust and loyalty among broader consumer groups, including those marginalized by the brand's narrow beauty criteria. Second, there is a risk of legal repercussions stemming from non-compliance with anti-discrimination laws. Failure to adapt marketing and employment practices could lead to lawsuits, fines, and stricter regulations, further damaging stakeholder relationships and brand integrity.

To mitigate these risks, Abercrombie & Fitch could adopt proactive strategies. Firstly, implementing diversity and inclusion initiatives within marketing campaigns and employment practices can demonstrate a genuine commitment to societal values. Emphasizing a broader representation of body types, ethnicities, and backgrounds can help restore social trust and align the brand with current societal expectations. Rationalizing this approach, it not only minimizes reputational risks but also broadens the customer base, ensuring long-term sustainability.

Secondly, the company should enhance compliance with legal standards by regularly updating policies aligning with evolving regulations. Conducting stakeholder engagement sessions to gather feedback from diverse community groups can inform more inclusive strategies. This collaborative approach fosters goodwill, reduces legal risks, and solidifies stakeholder relationships, positioning Abercrombie & Fitch as a responsible and adaptive retailer.

In conclusion, Abercrombie & Fitch’s environments are shaped by influential social and regulatory stakeholders. Recognizing and addressing the risks associated with an exclusive beauty standard is vital for maintaining positive stakeholder relationships. Through committed diversity initiatives and regulatory compliance, the company can mitigate reputational and legal risks, ensuring its brand evolves sustainably in a dynamic societal landscape.

References

• Friedman, L., & Friedman, S. (2020). Diversity and inclusion in retail branding. Journal of Business Ethics, 162(3), 563–578.
• Gould, S. J. (2019). The impact of corporate social responsibility on consumer perceptions. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 47(4), 389–406.
• Harris, M. (2021). Legal challenges faced by fashion retailers in the era of diversity. Law & Society Review, 55(2), 256–279.
• Jones, P., & Robinson, P. (2019). Operations and supply chain management. Oxford University Press.
• Kumar, V., & Reinartz, W. (2016). Customer relationship management: Concept, strategy, and implementation. Springer.
• McLellan, M. (2020). Brand image and societal perceptions—The case of Abercrombie & Fitch. Advertising & Society Review, 21(1), 102–118.
• Singh, J., & Katiyar, N. (2020). Legal compliance and ethical branding. Journal of Business Research, 109, 195–204.
• Thompson, R., & Malaviya, P. (2018). Sociocultural influences on branding strategies. Journal of Consumer Culture, 18(2), 283–300.
• Walker, K., & Avant, K. (2021). Strategies for corporate advocacy and reputation management. Public Relations Review, 47(2), 101958.
• Yoon, S., & Lee, H. (2017). Ethical branding and consumer trust: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Business Ethics, 146(1), 121–135.