Analyze Your Recent Purchase Of A Durable Good

Analyzea Recent Purchase You Made Of A Durable Good Durable Goods Are

Analyze a recent purchase you made of a durable good (durable goods are goods that don't wear out quickly or those that have a lifespan of more than three years - computers, cars, mobile phones, kitchen appliances, etc.) Write a 1,050- to 1,400-word paper in which you review the steps that you took in making this purchasing decision. Base your review on the following six steps in the consumer decision process: Problem recognition, information search, alternative evaluation, purchase, use, and evaluation. Answer the following questions in your paper: How many of these stages did you go through? Which stage(s) in the purchasing process was/were most important to you? If you skipped certain stages, what marketing or previous experience influenced you to skip this stage? What could the selling organization have done more effectively from a marketing standpoint to help you move through these stages? Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.

Paper For Above instruction

The process of purchasing a durable good is a complex journey that integrates cognitive and emotional factors, influenced by various stages as delineated in consumer behavior theory. In this essay, I will analyze my recent purchase of a new smartphone, using the six-step consumer decision process: problem recognition, information search, alternative evaluation, purchase, use, and post-purchase evaluation. I will reflect on each stage's significance, any stages I may have consciously skipped, and how marketing strategies could be optimized to facilitate a more seamless decision-making process.

Problem Recognition

The decision to purchase a new smartphone was primarily driven by problem recognition, a fundamental initial stage where a consumer perceives a discrepancy between their current state and desired needs (Schiffman & Kanuk, 2010). My previous device, a two-year-old model, was experiencing battery degradation and slow processing speeds, impairing my daily functionality. This discomfort served as a trigger to recognize the need for an upgraded device. External stimuli such as advertisements and peer recommendations also heightened my awareness of newer models with advanced features, reinforcing my perception of a problem that needed addressing.

Information Search

In the second stage, I engaged in an extensive information search, both internally from my memory and externally through online reviews, retail websites, and social media platforms. Due to the abundance of available options, I sought to narrow down choices by considering specifications, brand reputation, pricing, and user feedback. The internet's vast resources played a crucial role in helping me compare features and identify which models offered the best value. This stage lasted several weeks, as I wanted to ensure an informed decision that aligned with my budget and needs.

Alternative Evaluation

The alternative evaluation phase involved systematically comparing shortlisted smartphones based on criteria such as camera quality, battery life, operating system, price, and overall brand trustworthiness. I created a pro and con list for each model and prioritized features that mattered most to me, such as camera performance and battery longevity. Social proof, such as reviews from tech experts and peer opinions, significantly influenced my evaluation, lending credibility and reducing uncertainty. At this juncture, I also visited retail stores to handle physical devices, assessing ergonomic feel and user interface responsiveness.

Purchase

The purchase stage was relatively straightforward, influenced mainly by online promotions and cash-back offers. I decided to purchase from a trusted retailer who provided a competitive price along with a flexible return policy and official warranty. During checkout, I considered additional accessories such as a protective case and screen protector, which I also purchased. The checkout process was smooth, aided by clear payment options and prompt customer service, reassuring me regarding post-purchase support.

Use

Post-purchase, I engaged in the use stage, where I familiarized myself with the device's functionalities, installed necessary applications, and explored its features. This stage is crucial as it often determines satisfaction and future loyalty. My initial experience was positive, with the device exceeding expectations in camera quality and speed. However, I encountered some difficulties with software updates, which temporarily affected my confidence. Ongoing user support and tutorial guides from the manufacturer played an essential role in optimizing my usage experience.

Evaluation (Post-Purchase)

After several weeks of use, I evaluated my overall satisfaction. I considered whether the device met my expectations based on prior research and initial impressions. The smartphone greatly enhanced my daily productivity and photo-taking capabilities, confirming I had made a suitable choice. Conversely, minor issues like software bugs prompted me to seek support and provide feedback to the manufacturer. Their effective customer service and firmware updates resolved these problems, reinforcing my positive perception.

Reflection on the Decision Process

Throughout this purchase, I consciously navigated most of the six stages, with problem recognition, information search, and alternative evaluation being most critical. Interestingly, I bypassed an extensive pre-purchase evaluation of lesser-known brands due to pre-existing brand loyalty and positive past experiences, influenced by effective brand marketing and personal familiarity. Additionally, the purchase stage was expedited because of promotional incentives and trusted retailer reputation, reducing the need for exhaustive decision-making.

Marketing Implications

From a marketing perspective, the company could enhance customer journey facilitation by providing more personalized information during the evaluation stage, such as comparison tools and customer testimonials. Additionally, offering comprehensive post-purchase support through tutorials and responsive customer service could improve satisfaction and foster loyalty. Effective use of targeted advertising, clear value propositions, and engaging after-sales communication are essential tools that can streamline the decision process and influence consumer choices favorably.

Conclusion

The decision to purchase a new smartphone exemplifies a layered consumer decision-making process, influenced by internal needs and external marketing stimuli. Recognizing each stage's role reveals opportunities for marketers to optimize engagement strategies, ultimately easing consumers’ path from problem recognition to post-purchase satisfaction. Understanding this process not only benefits marketing professionals but also empowers consumers to make more informed and confident decisions regarding durable goods.

References

  • Schiffman, L. G., & Kanuk, L. L. (2010). Consumer behavior (10th ed.). Pearson Education.
  • Solomon, M. R. (2018). Consumer behavior: Buying, having, and being. Pearson.
  • Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing management (15th ed.). Pearson.
  • Lamb, C. W., Hair, J. F., & McDaniel, C. (2018). MKTG (12th ed.). Cengage Learning.
  • Hoyer, W. D., MacInnis, D. J., & Pieters, R. (2013). Consumer behavior (6th ed.). Cengage Learning.
  • Hassan, L. M., Shiu, E. M., Parry, S., & Parry, S. (2018). Consumer behaviour: An Asian perspective. Routledge.
  • Goi, C. L. (2009). A review of marketing mix: 4Ps or more? International Journal of Marketing Studies, 1(1), 2-14.
  • Arnold, M. J., & Reynolds, K. E. (2012). Approaches to consumer socialization and their implications for marketing. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(6), 1278-1283.
  • Park, C. W., Jun, S. Y., & Shaw, D. (1996). A typology of new product adopters among college students. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 24(2), 151-159.
  • Cheng, S. C., & Ko, H. C. (2014). The impact of consumer decision-making processes on purchase intentions. Journal of Business & Economics Research, 12(1), 33-44.