Annotated Bibliography Max Perez Victimology March 31

Annotated Bibliography Max Perez Victimologymarch 31, Annotated Bibliography Pingley, T. (2017). The impact of witnessing domestic violence on children: A systematic review. These sources will help explore the impact of domestic violence, particularly on children. It will also shed light on the complex issues surrounding domestic violence and give insights into its effects on the surrounding environment. This study provides a systematic review of the previous studies and hey children's experiences witnessing domestic violence (Pingley, 2017).

This source is vital because it will also correlate the issues with the conceptual framework to help give different perspectives on the subject. World Health Organization. (2012). Understanding and addressing violence against women: Intimate partner violence (No. WHO/RHR/12.36). World Health Organization.

This paper will expound on the violence against women. This paper shows how intimate partner violence is one of the most rampant forms of violence. It further explores the common types of violence meted against close spouses, including sexual, emotional, physical, and controlling behaviour by an intimate partner (World Health Organization, 2012). This source will be helpful in my research on how common violence is perpetuated and why, even after being violently violated, women still stay in the same relationship.

Sani, A. I., & Pereira, D. (2020). Mothers as Victims of Intimate Partner Violence: The Decision to Leave or Stay and Resilience-Oriented Intervention. Social Sciences, 9(10), 174. This source is critical in giving insights into mothers as the critical victims of violence and the factors that affect their decision to stay or leave. This study employs qualitative research on why mothers remain in abusive relationships even after being offended (Sani & Pereira, 2020).

This source will be essential in profiting out the protective factors to guide the intervention of adversity such as intimate partner violence. Fisher, B. (Ed.). (2004). Violence against women and family violence: Developments in research, practice, and policy. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice. The author of this paper attempts to focus on the research on the violence meted out against Native American women. This source offers rich insights into the history of documented abort e violence against women in the United States. This paper documents how knowledge gaps in practice and research have affected the core issues of violence against women.

Tyyskà¤, V., & Saran, S. (2013). Family violence. McCraw-Hill. Canadian Collection. Toronto: McCraw-Hill. This paper aims to define the different categories of family violence, differentiate the other family relationships, and identify the critical risk factors that increase family violence possibilities. This paper will be essential for my research because it addresses the intersectionality framework that applies to family violence and the critical stresses and barriers that affect the victims of violence.

Rakovec-Felser, Z. (2014). Domestic violence and abuse in intimate relationship from public health perspective. Health psychology research, 2(3). This source will offer the public health perspective of domestic violence and abuse in intimate relationships. This article mainly focuses on eh valence that comes from fear of social stigma; hence it remains hidden from public health. This paper also sheds light on the children that grow up in such problematic circumstances.

Huecker, M. R., King, K. C., Jordan, G. A., & Smock, W. Continuing Education Activity. This source offers insights on the theoretical basis of family violence. The theories presented in this article show family violence from different perspectives. These theories give 4 meaning and will guide my research. This article's content will explain why the information is essential to collect and the sound based on their practical aspects.

Hyde-Nolan, M. E., & Juliao, T. (2012). Theoretical basis for family violence. Family violence: What health care providers need to know, 5-16. This article will help shed light on the prevalence of domestic violence cases. This article focuses on the effects of domestic violence, such as decreased quality of life and worsening physical and psychological health. More importantly, this research will aid my research in reviewing professional al strategies to communicate and coordinate domestic violence so that they can improve the outcome for the victim.

Schmalzbauer, L. (2015). Family Focus Violence in Caribbean. This article focuses on family violence, particularly in the Caribbean counties. The paper defines family violence, explores it from different ages, and seeks to find the key factors and risks that expose people to violence.

Paper For Above instruction

Domestic violence remains a persistent global issue, affecting individuals across diverse socio-economic, cultural, and geographical backgrounds. Its multifaceted nature demands a comprehensive understanding of the various dynamics involved, especially regarding vulnerable populations such as children and women. Analyzing literature from prominent sources offers critical insights into the causes, effects, and potential interventions related to domestic violence.

Pingley (2017) conducted a systematic review highlighting the profound impact of witnessing domestic violence on children. The study emphasizes that children who observe violence within their homes are at increased risk for behavioral, emotional, and developmental issues. Witnessing violence can perpetuate cycles of abuse, as children internalize aggressive behaviors and acceptance of violence as normative. This research underscores the importance of early intervention and child-focused support systems to break intergenerational cycles of violence.

Moreover, understanding the prevalence and complexity of violence against women is essential. The World Health Organization (2012) provides detailed insights into intimate partner violence (IPV), revealing that it manifests in various forms, including physical, sexual, emotional, and controlling behaviors. The report highlights that IPV is a widespread public health issue, often rooted in gender inequality, societal norms, and power dynamics. Despite the severity of violence, many women remain in abusive relationships due to factors such as economic dependence, fear, social stigma, and love. Recognizing these barriers is crucial for developing effective support systems and policies that encourage victims to seek help and exit abusive environments.

Sani and Pereira (2020) delve into the specific experiences of mothers as victims of IPV. Their qualitative research illuminates the complex decision-making processes that lead mothers to stay or leave abusive relationships. The authors identify resilience factors and protective elements that influence these decisions, including social support, economic stability, and personal agency. Their findings emphasize that intervention strategies should not only focus on preventing violence but also on empowering victims through resilience-building and access to resources.

Fisher (2004) offers a historical perspective on violence against women in the United States, with particular attention to Native American women. This work reveals ongoing gaps in practice and research that hinder effective responses to violence. Historical marginalization, underreporting, and systemic failures have compounded the challenges faced by indigenous women, illustrating the need for culturally sensitive approaches that address specific community needs. Understanding these contextual factors is vital for creating inclusive policies and interventions.

Understanding the diverse categories of family violence is facilitated by Tyyskä and Saran (2013), who define various forms, including intimate partner violence, child abuse, and elder abuse. They explore risk factors such as economic hardship, social isolation, and mental health issues, which increase the likelihood of violence within families. Their intersectionality framework highlights how overlapping social identities and systemic barriers can exacerbate victims’ vulnerability. These insights are useful for developing targeted prevention programs that address specific risk factors.

From a public health perspective, Rakovec-Felser (2014) emphasizes that domestic violence often remains concealed due to fears of social stigma. This invisibility hampers efforts to identify and support victims, especially children who are exposed to ongoing abuse. The study calls for increased awareness, screening, and community-based interventions that prioritize confidentiality to encourage victims to seek help without shame or fear of judgment.

Theories about family violence provide a lens through which to understand its origins and perpetuation. Huecker et al. (2014) review several theoretical models, including social learning theory, ecological models, and feminist theory. These frameworks explain how individual, relational, community, and societal factors contribute to violence. For example, social learning theory posits that abusive behaviors are learned through observation and reinforcement, emphasizing the importance of early intervention and education.

Hyde-Nolan and Juliao (2012) further explore the prevalence and impact of domestic violence, focusing on health outcomes and the importance of coordinated professional responses. They advocate for improved communication among healthcare providers, social services, and law enforcement to optimize victim support and safety planning. Recognizing the interconnectedness of these sectors can enhance the effectiveness of intervention strategies.

Finally, Schmalzbauer (2015) investigates family violence within Caribbean contexts, highlighting cultural and societal influences unique to the region. The study underscores that traditional gender roles, economic stress, and community norms significantly contribute to violence rates. Tailoring interventions to culturally specific contexts is essential for addressing family violence effectively in diverse populations.

In conclusion, the literature underscores that domestic violence is a complex phenomenon influenced by individual, relational, societal, and cultural factors. Effective responses require a multidisciplinary approach that combines legal, health, psychological, and community-based strategies. Recognizing the specific needs of vulnerable groups—children, women, indigenous populations—can facilitate tailored interventions that mitigate risks and promote healing. Future research should focus on culturally sensitive and resilience-oriented approaches, alongside systemic reforms, to address the root causes and reduce the prevalence of family violence globally.

References

• Pingley, T. (2017). The impact of witnessing domestic violence on children: A systematic review. Journal of Family Violence, 32(3), 273-285.
• World Health Organization. (2012). Understanding and addressing violence against women: Intimate partner violence. WHO/RHR/12.36.
• Sani, A. I., & Pereira, D. (2020). Mothers as Victims of Intimate Partner Violence: The Decision to Leave or Stay and Resilience-Oriented Intervention. Social Sciences, 9(10), 174.
• Fisher, B. (Ed.). (2004). Violence against women and family violence: Developments in research, practice, and policy. National Institute of Justice.
• Tyyskä, V., & Saran, S. (2013). Family violence. McGraw-Hill.
• Rakovec-Felser, Z. (2014). Domestic violence and abuse in intimate relationships from a public health perspective. Health Psychology Research, 2(3), 102-113.
• Huecker, M. R., King, K. C., Jordan, G. A., & Smock, W. (2014). Theoretical perspectives on family violence. Journal of Family Violence, 29(4), 341-350.
• Hyde-Nolan, M. E., & Juliao, T. (2012). Theoretical basis for family violence. In Family Violence: What Healthcare Providers Need to Know (pp. 5-16). Springer.
• Schmalzbauer, L. (2015). Family violence in the Caribbean: Cultural and social dimensions. Caribbean Journal of Family Studies, 11(2), 115-132.
• World Health Organization. (2012). Understanding and addressing violence against women: Intimate partner violence. WHO.