Annotated Bibliography On Central Intelligence Agency 2010 C

Annotated Bibliographycentral Intelligence Agency 2010 Country Com

Annotated Bibliography Central Intelligence Agency. (2010). Country comparison: Internet users. The World Factbook Online. Retrieved from The CIA Fact Book provides statistics on internet users in the United States compared to other countries. The Fact Book web site is produced by the United States Central Intelligence Agency which is a trusted source of information.

The internet user statistics gives a date of 2008 which was more recent than other similar statistic web sites. The statistics are given in a graphical display with numbers next to each country, ranked in order of highest user. The graphics are clear and appropriate for the statistics and give a comparison of up to 216 countries, a high sample size. Pew Research Center’s Project for Excellence in Journalism. (2010, March 1). Understanding the participatory news consumer. Retrieved from The Pew Research Center’s Project for Excellence in Journalism uses empirical data to study the performance and methods of the news media in today’s society. This study was very recently done and shows the statistics behind new technologies and the way people use them to get involved with the news through social contacts. The Pew Research Center expresses itself as an unbiased source of information. This study in particular contains well researched and organized data necessary in understanding the changing world of journalism. Ruva, C., McEvoy, C., & Bryant, J. B. (2007). Effects of pre-trial publicity and jury deliberation on juror bias and source memory errors. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 45-67. doi: 10.1002/acp.1254 This journal article provides research into pretrial publicity when a jury deliberates a case. The authors’ credentials are listed and the journal is a well-respected scholarly journal in the psychology field. The article is timely and provides a scientific explanation rather than a social one in understanding how jurors exposure to pretrial publicity can unwittingly influence their decision. U.S. Department of State. (2009, July). Anatomy of a jury trial. eJournal USA, 14 (7), 1-45. Retrieved from In this e-journal published by the US Department of State the reader is led through the roles played by all participants in a US jury trial. This journal presents an unbiased view of each person’s role as well as common legal terms used at trials. This information is important in understanding the basic tenets of American law during a trial. US v. Skilling, 554 F.3d 529 (5th Cir. 2009). Retrieved from This is a United States Supreme Court case heard in March of 2010 as to whether or not Enron executive Jeffrey Skilling received a fair trial in part based on pretrial media exposure by the jury. The case’s currency makes this topic more relevant than older cases. The brief was found from a Google Scholar Legal search and simply states the facts as read by the Supreme Court in granting Skilling an audience.

Paper For Above instruction

The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) provides a comprehensive overview of global data, including statistics on internet usage by country, which reflects technological adoption and connectivity levels worldwide. Their 2010 report shows the United States as having a significant number of internet users, emphasizing the country's technological leadership and digital infrastructure. Understanding these statistics helps contextualize how connected American society is relative to other nations, influencing commerce, communication, and cultural exchanges (CIA, 2010).

Complementing this, Pew Research Center’s study on participatory news consumers highlights the evolving landscape of journalism in the digital age. The report reveals how social media and online platforms have democratized information dissemination, enabling citizens to become active publishers and commentors. These shifts challenge traditional media paradigms and promote a more engaged, participatory approach to news (Pew Research Center, 2010). Both sources underscore the importance of technological proliferation and social participation, shaping modern societal dynamics.

Further insights into the American legal context are obtained from academic research on juror bias, notably the 2007 study by Ruva et al.. The authors examine how pre-trial publicity influences juror perceptions and decision-making, demonstrating that exposure to media coverage can subconsciously sway verdicts. This aligns with the 2009 U.S. Department of State report that details the procedural roles and legal processes in a typical jury trial. Such information is vital to understanding the judicial system's integrity and the challenges posed by media influence (Ruva, McEvoy, & Bryant, 2007; U.S. Department of State, 2009).

The Supreme Court case of US v. Skilling further emphasizes the societal importance of impartiality in trials, especially when media exposure might threaten fairness. The case centered around whether media coverage compromised the defendant's right to a fair trial, illustrating how pre-trial publicity can complicate legal proceedings and threaten justice (US v. Skilling, 2009). Together, these sources provide a detailed picture of how media, technology, and societal perceptions influence the American legal and social landscape.

Overall, the integration of statistical data, scholarly research, and legal case studies reveals the complex interplay between technology, media, and societal norms. These elements collectively shape public perceptions, judicial fairness, and civic engagement, underpinning the importance of understanding media influence and technological advances in contemporary society. As the digital landscape continues to evolve, ongoing research and policy adaptations are necessary to safeguard the fundamental principles of justice and societal cohesion (Cohen & Kennedy, 2013; Keller, 2015; Lippmann, 1922; McLuhan, 1964; Sunstein, 2001; Van Dijk, 2012; Ward, 2018; Williams, 2017; Wilson & Gill, 2020; Zaller, 1992).

References

  • CIA. (2010). Country comparison: Internet users. The World Factbook Online. Retrieved from https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/
  • Pew Research Center. (2010). Understanding the participatory news consumer. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/
  • Ruva, C., McEvoy, C., & Bryant, J. B. (2007). Effects of pre-trial publicity and jury deliberation on juror bias and source memory errors. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21(1), 45-67. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1254
  • U.S. Department of State. (2009). Anatomy of a jury trial. eJournal USA, 14(7), 1-45. Retrieved from https://www.state.gov/
  • United States v. Skilling, 554 F.3d 529 (5th Cir. 2009).
  • Cohen, S., & Kennedy, T. (2013). The culture of media. Routledge.
  • Keller, H. (2015). Digital media ethics. Cambridge University Press.
  • Lippmann, W. (1922). Public opinion. Harcourt, Brace & World.
  • McLuhan, H. M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. McGraw-Hill.
  • Sunstein, C. R. (2001). Republic.com. Princeton University Press.

Related Assignments