Annotated Bibliography On Mental Health Patients In PR

Annotated Bibliography 7topic Mental Health Patients In Pr

ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY 7 TOPIC: Mental Health Patients in Prison Student’s Name Institutional Affiliation Instructor’s Name Course Title Date Agarwal, P. P., Manjunatha, N., Gowda, G. S., Kumar, M. G., Shanthaveeranna, N., Kumar, C. N., & Math, S. B. (2019). Collaborative tele-neuropsychiatry consultation services for patients in central prisons. Journal of neurosciences in rural practice, 10(01). The critical point discussed by the authors is tele-neuropsychiatry consultation services among inmates in most prisons. The article explains the frequency of seeking for tele-neuropsychiatry consultation services and metal treatment among inmates has increased over the past five years.

The increase in such cases is a result of most people imprisoned undergoing painful life experiences, which makes them have mental disorders. As a result, this causes an increase in the number of inmates who seek mental check-ups and other related cases. According to the authors of this article, most inmates experience mental conditions due to multiple problems that they engage in, which makes them have mental cases. The article further notes that research conducted engaging Psychiatry and neurology revealed that a higher percentage of inmates experiencing psychological issues are men. The main reason for this is because most men engage in some activities which make them have stress, thus leading to mental conditions.

Bell, S., Hopkin, G., & Forrester, A. (2019). Exposure to traumatic events and the experience of burnout, compassion fatigue and compassion satisfaction among prison mental health staff: an exploratory survey. Issues in mental health nursing, 40(4). The article discusses the mental health of the prison staff and how their exposure to the traumatic environment makes them vulnerable to developing psychiatric issues. The aim of the research in the article was to determine the effects of exposing workers in mental health prisons to traumatic events burnout, compassion fatigue, and satisfaction.

Authors assert the exposure may cause staff to experience burnout, decreased compassion satisfaction, and even experience compassion fatigue. The publication presents the findings of a study in prison that indicates that exposure to traumatic events, the nature of the working environment as well as the characteristics of staff are the major causes of burnout and other negative feelings among prison employees. The source is relevant to the study as it will help in understanding the challenges that mental health workers go through to ensure that mentally ill prisoners are served appropriately. It also gives an insight into the need for providing prison employees with a safe and appropriate working environment to enhance their mental status.

Ellis, A. (2019). Forensic psychiatry and mental health in Australia: an overview. CNS spectrums, 1-3. The author, who is a psychiatric professor at the University of South Wales, aims to provide a review of one development of forensic psychiatric and mental health services in Australia. The article seemed at international readers who might be interested in the prevalence of mental health in the department of criminal justice.

The source discusses the various colonial system legacies that might have contributed to the current interaction between the healthcare services targeting mentally ill individuals and the justice system. It also gives a review on the development of suitable legislation, court services, prison services, hospitals, as well as the community at large. Primarily, the author considered the gap that exists between the healthcare services and the prison services. The source is essential for the study on mental health in prisons as it gives the insight on how close the criminal justice department works together with the healthcare department to ensure the mental wellbeing of the mentally sick inmates.

Farabee, D., Hall, E., Zaheer, A., & Joshi, V. (2019). The impact of perceived stigma on psychiatric care and outcomes for correctional mental health patients. Psychiatry Research, 276. The article examines the various factors associated with the delivery and effectiveness of psychiatric care before and after the release of inmates from prisons. The authors emphasized the self-reported needs that were presented by the patients, the adherence to the psychotropic medication, and the mental stigma associated with treatment.

Additionally, the article discusses how healthcare services are given to prisoners with mental illnesses related to their release as well as their re-entry into correctional facilities. Authors identify the stigma of being identified as mentally ill as one of the major causes of challenges when prisoners with psychiatric issues are released back into society. Essentially, the article is relevant to the study as it provides information relating to the stigma brought about by psychiatric care that inmates received while in the correctional facilities. It gives an in-depth understanding of whether the healthcare services are useful to prepare prisoners before releasing them back to the community.

Georgiou, M., & Townsend, K. (2019). Quality Network for Prison Mental Health Services: reviewing the quality of mental health provision in prisons. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 30(5). The article focuses on the quality of prison mental health services in the United Kingdom and Ireland. According to the authors, the quality of mental health care in prison in the United Kingdom and Ireland has been poor over time, a condition which has raised many criticisms over the past few years.

Due to the high demand for health services in the community, more attention by mental health providers have been diverted to the community. As a result, mental health services in prison offered to inmates has deteriorated over the past few years. According to the findings of research in this study, Schizophrenia is one of the leading mental health problems prevalent in most prisons in the United Kingdom and Ireland. Also, the article adds that due to inmate uproar about the poor quality of mental health services in prisons, sight improvement have been reported in some prison in different parts of the United Kingdom.

Marr, C., Morris, J., Francis, K., & Schmidt, M. (2019). Mental Health Treatment in United States Prison Systems: The Influence of Varying Treatment Methods on Inmates with Schizophrenia. The authors of this article talk about mental health treatment in United States prisons. According to them, Schizophrenia is one of the primary mental health conditions prevalent in the United States prison. It is a psychological order that has symptoms like those of delusions, hallucinations, and confused thoughts or lack of speech. In this article, the authors explained that most of the patients with this disorder are prisoners and that such disease has adverse effects on the mental health of patients.

Furthermore, the article noted that the treatment of mental health cases in prison in the United States differs depending on the levels of psychological problems. The authors of this article add that Schizophrenia is the most prevalent mental condition found among inmates in the United States prison. Even though the leading cause of this disorder remains unknown, its causes are associated with psychological and environmental factors with stress is identified as the possible leading cause.

Neumann, B., Ross, T., & Opitz-Welke, A. (2019). Foreign National Patients in German Prison Psychiatry. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 10. The publication presents research conducted by Newman, Ross, and Opitz-Welke on the patients' population of the foreign mentally ill patients from the German prisons. The study aimed to investigate the differences in the number of international patients treated in high-security hospitals as compared to those in the psychiatric wards in prison hospitals. Generally, the objectives of the researchers were to establish whether there were cases of citizenship based discrimination in correctional institutions when it comes to treating prisoners with mental disease.

From the study, it was concluded that mentally-ill individuals from other nations but in the German prisons had fewer chances of being taken to the high-security hospitals as compared to the German citizens. Instead, they are often taken psychiatric wards located in the jails. This article is significantly essential to the study as it provides information on some of the challenges that mentally-ill prisoners might undergo while in the foreign correctional facilities.

Paper For Above instruction

The issue of mental health among prisoners is a complex and pressing challenge that intersects with various aspects of the criminal justice system, healthcare provision, and societal perceptions. As globally observed, a disproportionate number of incarcerated individuals experience mental health problems, including disorders such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, depression, and antisocial personality disorder. This high prevalence highlights the urgent need for specialized mental health services within correctional facilities, as well as systemic reforms to address the root causes and consequences of this crisis.

The increasing recognition of mental health issues in prisons has led to innovative approaches such as tele-neuropsychiatry consultation services, which have expanded mental health care access in resource-limited settings. Agarwal et al. (2019) emphasize that telepsychiatry provides an effective solution to bridge the gap in mental health services for inmates in central prisons. These remote consultations facilitate timely diagnosis and treatment, reducing the burden on on-site mental health professionals and overcoming logistical challenges inherent in prison environments. Such technological innovations are critical, especially considering the scarcity of mental health specialists in rural or underfunded jurisdictions, and their adoption signifies a progressive step toward equitable mental health care for incarcerated populations.

However, addressing mental health needs in prisons is not solely about providing clinical services; it also involves safeguarding the well-being of mental health staff who serve these populations. Bell, Hopkin, and Forrester (2019) explore how exposure to traumatic events and challenging working conditions can lead to burnout, compassion fatigue, and decreased compassion satisfaction among prison mental health workers. Their findings underscore the importance of establishing supportive and safe working environments to maintain the mental health and resilience of staff. Without adequate safeguards, the quality of mental health services could be compromised, further exacerbating prisoner outcomes. Therefore, staff well-being is a crucial component of a holistic approach to prison mental health care.

The global context of forensic mental health services reveals variations in service quality, legislative frameworks, and the integration of mental health into criminal justice systems. Ellis (2019) provides an overview of the development of forensic psychiatric and mental health services in Australia, highlighting how colonial legacies and systemic gaps influence current practices. The insights from Australia demonstrate the importance of legislative support and interdepartmental collaboration to ensure effective mental health care for offenders. Such models could serve as lessons for other countries, emphasizing a balanced approach that respects human rights while maintaining public safety.

Another challenge in prison mental health care involves stigma—both societal and within the correctional system—that hinders effective treatment and reintegration. Farabee et al. (2019) examine how perceived stigma impacts psychiatric care quality and outcomes for inmates. The stigma associated with mental illness can discourage prisoners from seeking help, adherence to medication may decline, and reintegration into society becomes more difficult due to societal barriers. Tackling stigma requires targeted interventions at both policy and community levels to foster acceptance and ensure adequate mental health support before and after incarceration.

Assessing the quality of mental health services, especially in the United Kingdom and Ireland, reveals concerns about deteriorating standards and resource allocation. Georgiou and Townsend (2019) review how reductions in mental health staffing and funding lead to subpar conditions within prisons. Their findings about the prevalence of schizophrenia and other mental illnesses expose the urgent need to revitalize mental health infrastructure, emphasizing that quality care is fundamental for reducing recidivism and improving inmates’ psychological well-being.

In the context of the United States, Marr et al. (2019) analyze variation in treatment methods for inmates with schizophrenia, the most prevalent mental health disorder in American prisons. Their research links the quality and type of intervention to patient outcomes, signifying that tailored and evidence-based treatment approaches are essential. The high rates of schizophrenia cases reflect broader societal issues, such as lack of adequate community mental health services and the criminalization of mental illness.

Furthermore, the treatment of foreign national prisoners adds a layer of complexity. Neumann, Ross, and Opitz-Welke (2019) investigate disparities in psychiatric treatment for foreign versus German patients. The discrimination faced by foreign inmates, often being placed in general psychiatric wards instead of specialized high-security hospitals, reflects systemic biases and highlights the need for policies ensuring equitable treatment regardless of nationality, thus safeguarding human rights within correctional systems.

In conclusion, mental health among prison populations is a multifaceted issue that requires comprehensive, ethical, and resource-backed strategies. Innovations like telepsychiatry can bridge service gaps, but workforce support and anti-stigma programs are equally vital. International examples reveal that systemic reforms, legislative frameworks, and a focus on quality care are essential to improve outcomes. Effective collaboration between criminal justice and healthcare sectors, alongside targeted policies to address disparities, can foster environments that promote mental well-being and ultimately contribute to societal safety and rehabilitation.

References

• Agarwal, P. P., Manjunatha, N., Gowda, G. S., Kumar, M. G., Shanthaveeranna, N., Kumar, C. N., & Math, S. B. (2019). Collaborative tele-neuropsychiatry consultation services for patients in central prisons. Journal of neurosciences in rural practice, 10(01).
• Bell, S., Hopkin, G., & Forrester, A. (2019). Exposure to traumatic events and the experience of burnout, compassion fatigue and compassion satisfaction among prison mental health staff: an exploratory survey. Issues in mental health nursing, 40(4).
• Ellis, A. (2019). Forensic psychiatry and mental health in Australia: an overview. CNS spectrums, 1-3.
• Farabee, D., Hall, E., Zaheer, A., & Joshi, V. (2019). The impact of perceived stigma on psychiatric care and outcomes for correctional mental health patients. Psychiatry Research, 276.
• Georgiou, M., & Townsend, K. (2019). Quality Network for Prison Mental Health Services: reviewing the quality of mental health provision in prisons. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 30(5).
• Marr, C., Morris, J., Francis, K., & Schmidt, M. (2019). Mental Health Treatment in United States Prison Systems: The Influence of Varying Treatment Methods on Inmates with Schizophrenia.
• Neumann, B., Ross, T., & Opitz-Welke, A. (2019). Foreign National Patients in German Prison Psychiatry. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 10.
• Metzner, J. L., & Fellner, J. (2013). Solitary confinement and mental illness in US prisons: A challenge for medical ethics. Health and Human Rights in a Changing World, 316.
• Fazel, S., Hayes, A. J., Bartellas, K., Clerici, M., & Trestman, R. (2016). Mental health of prisoners: prevalence, adverse outcomes, and interventions. The Lancet Psychiatry, 3(9).