Answer A Paragraph Of At Least 4 Sentences For Each Question

Answer A Paragraph Of Minimum 4 Sentences For Each Question Plagiariz

What qualities or factors allowed men like Carnegie, Rockefeller and Morgan to succeed in business?

Andrew Carnegie, John D. Rockefeller, and J.P. Morgan exemplified traits such as strategic vision, relentless determination, and an ability to adapt to changing economic environments. Carnegie's focus on innovation in steel manufacturing, Rockefeller's monopoly on oil through aggressive business practices, and Morgan's mastery in finance and banking all demonstrate their sharp business acumen. Additionally, their access to capital, networks of influential connections, and ability to leverage economies of scale played crucial roles in their success. The combination of ambition, operational efficiency, and political influence further cemented their dominance in their respective industries.

Who Generally won the Labor conflicts of the 19th Century? With whom did the public generally side?

During the 19th century, corporations and industrialists often emerged victorious in labor conflicts due to their resources, political influence, and ability to deploy strikebreakers and private security. Labor unions, on the other hand, frequently faced suppression, legal restrictions, and violent confrontations, which limited their power. The public's opinion was generally sympathetic towards industrialists and business owners, particularly among the middle and upper classes, who favored stability and economic progress. Workers and union leaders struggled to garner widespread public support, as their strikes and protests were often portrayed as disruptive to societal order and economic growth.

What were the major differences between social and reform Darwinism?

Social Darwinism applied Charles Darwin's theory of natural selection to society, emphasizing competition, survival of the fittest, and the idea that social progress resulted from struggle and dominance by the strong. It was often used to justify inequalities, imperialism, and laissez-faire economic policies, suggesting that success was a result of inherent superiority. Reform Darwinism, however, sought to adapt evolutionary principles to promote social improvement and cooperation; it emphasized the importance of environment, education, and social reform in creating a more equitable society. While social Darwinism tended to endorse social hierarchy and laissez-faire policies, reform Darwinism advocated for government intervention and social programs to ensure fairer opportunities for all.

What impact did Social and Reform Darwinism have on political thought?

Social Darwinism influenced political thought by bolstering laissez-faire capitalism, reducing the emphasis on government intervention in economic and social issues, and justifying inequality and imperialism. It provided intellectual support for policies favoring minimal regulation and individualist pursuits. In contrast, reform Darwinism contributed to the rise of Progressive politics, encouraging government action to address social injustices, improve public health, and expand educational opportunities. The debate between these currents of thought shaped policies regarding economic regulation, social welfare, and conservation efforts during the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Ultimately, these contrasting ideas reflected divergent views on the role of government and the direction of societal development during a period of rapid change.

References

• Chandler, A. D. (1990). Scale and scope: The rise of the modern corporation. Harvard University Press.
• McKinney, S. J. (2021). The Gilded Age and the Progressive Era. In J. L. Bailey (Ed.), American History: A Survey (pp. 284-305). Oxford University Press.
• Schultz, S. (2014). Social Darwinism in American Thought. University of Chicago Press.
• Starr, P. (1982). The Social Transformation of American Medicine. Basic Books.
• Turner, F. J. (1893). The significance of the frontier in American history. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 9, 23-24.
• Turner, F. (1894). The significance of the frontier in American history. Proceedings of the American Historical Association, 1, 1-8.
• Wallace, P. (2004). Modern Social Darwinism: The influence of evolutionary thought on society. Palgrave Macmillan.
• Wilensky, H. L. (1967). Political Development and Social Change. Basic Books.
• Wirth, L. (1938). Urbanism as a way of life. The American Journal of Sociology, 44(1), 1-24.
• Zinn, H. (2003). A People's History of the United States. HarperCollins.