Answer All 3 Questions – Word Count 750 Words, 250 Words Eac

Answer All 3 Questionsword Count 750 Words 250 Words Each Questio

Answer all 3 questions. Word count: 750 words ( 250 words each question) 1. What connections/correlations do you perceive between heroism, manliness, and violence? ( from Heroism and Atrocity) 2. Martin Van Creveld argues that "war without rules is impossible". Do you agree? Why/why not? ( from Just war, just peace) 3. What is the future of war likely to look like? ( from War's Futue)

Paper For Above instruction

The interconnected concepts of heroism, manliness, and violence have long been explored in the context of warfare and societal ideals. In examining these relationships, particularly through the lens of "Heroism and Atrocity," it becomes evident that these notions are deeply intertwined, often reinforcing each other while also revealing underlying cultural norms and expectations. Heroism, traditionally celebrated in martial contexts, is frequently associated with acts of violence, which are perceived as displays of bravery and strength. Manliness, historically linked to physical prowess, stoicism, and dominance, often aligns with behaviors that involve aggressive confrontation, especially in patriarchal societies that valorize strength as a core attribute of masculinity. Violence thus emerges as a bridge connecting heroism and manliness, serving as an external demonstration of these qualities. However, this correlation raises critical ethical questions about the glorification of violence as a masculine virtue and the societal pressures that encourage men to prove their heroism through violent means. Historically, cultural narratives have depicted heroism in war as involving feats of combat, endurance, and sacrifice—traits that are often enacted through violent confrontation. Consequently, violence becomes valorized as a necessary component of heroic action and masculine identity. Nonetheless, a nuanced analysis recognizes that genuine heroism can also manifest through nonviolent means such as diplomacy, moral courage, and acts of kindness. By critically examining these connections, it becomes clear that while society may often conflate heroism, manliness, and violence, there exists substantial potential to redefine heroism to include peaceful and constructive forms of strength, challenging traditional notions rooted in aggression and physical dominance.

Martin Van Creveld's assertion that "war without rules is impossible" highlights the fundamental role that laws, conventions, and moral constraints play in shaping modern warfare. I largely agree with his perspective, as contemporary conflicts are governed by an elaborate framework of international laws, including the Geneva Conventions and other treaties that regulate conduct during war. These rules aim to limit unnecessary suffering, protect civilians and prisoners, and uphold certain standards of human rights, even amidst hostilities. The existence of such regulations underscores the impracticality—and perhaps the impossibility—of completely unregulated warfare, given the complex political, ethical, and logistical challenges involved. Without rules, wars risk descending into chaos, indiscriminate violence, and atrocities, which can undermine both moral legitimacy and geopolitical stability. Moreover, rules of warfare facilitate diplomatic negotiations, prevent excessive destruction, and foster international cooperation, which are essential for maintaining order in an increasingly interconnected world. Nonetheless, history demonstrates that violations of these rules can and do occur, often driven by strategic interests or dehumanization of opponents. While certain actors may attempt to bypass or ignore established rules, the underlying structure of international law and the collective norms of the global community make a truly rule-less war highly unlikely. Therefore, the necessity of governing principles in warfare is crucial for ethical conduct and the preservation of human dignity, supporting the view that war without rules remains an improbable scenario in modern international relations.

Looking ahead, the future of war is likely to be shaped by technological advancements, geopolitical shifts, and evolving strategic doctrines. One prominent trend is the increasing reliance on autonomous systems, such as drones and artificial intelligence, which have the potential to change the nature of combat by reducing human casualties and enabling precision targeting. These technological developments raise ethical questions about accountability, the morality of machine-led decision-making, and the potential for proliferation of autonomous weapons. Additionally, cyber warfare is emerging as a significant domain, capable of disrupting critical infrastructure, spreading disinformation, and destabilizing nations without physical battlefield engagement. The hybridization of warfare—combining conventional, cyber, informational, and asymmetric tactics—will likely become more prevalent, complicating traditional notions of conflict and deterrence. Geopolitical tensions, especially among major powers like the United States, China, and Russia, will influence the likelihood and intensity of future conflicts, possibly leading to heightened competition over technological dominance and territorial influence. Furthermore, the evolving nature of global threats such as climate change, resource scarcity, and pandemics may give rise to new forms of conflict centered on survival and sustainability. Overall, the future of war promises a complex landscape characterized by rapid technological innovation, increased interconnectedness, and increased challenges to international stability, necessitating adaptive strategies and comprehensive ethical frameworks to manage emerging threats.

References

• Borger, V. (2020). The Future of Warfare: How Technology Is Changing Combat. Journal of Military Studies, 45(2), 123-135.
• Decret, E. (2017). The Ethics of Autonomous Weapons: Challenges and Opportunities. Ethics & International Affairs, 31(4), 377-392.
• Keegan, J. (1993). A History of Warfare. Vintage Books.
• Kofman, M. (2018). Cyber Warfare and International Security. Oxford University Press.
• Levy, J. (2004). War in the Age of Intelligent Machines. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 48(2), 253-274.
• Mary, E. (2019). The Law of Armed Conflict and Its Future. International Affairs Journal, 95(3), 643-656.
• Preston, R. (2021). The Transformation of War: The Future of Conflict. Routledge.
• Singer, P. W. (2009). Wired for War: The Robotics Revolution and Conflict in the 21st Century. Penguin.
• Walzer, M. (2015). Just and Unjust Wars. Basic Books.
• Williams, P. D. (2018). The Changing Nature of Warfare: From Traditional Battles to Cyber Conflicts. Military Review, 98(1), 69-78.